Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHATSIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violations of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 13 in respect of the violations of Art. 2 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.10.2006 - 5108/02
• EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

  They also claimed that the special operation carried out on 6 August 2000 had not been properly planned and controlled by the authorities so as to minimise, to the greatest extent possible, recourse to lethal force (see McCann v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, § 194).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

  In particular, there must be an implicit requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition (see Yasa, cited above, § 102-04, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, ECHR 2000-III, §§ 106-07).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

  In view of the Court's findings above with regard to Article 2, the applicants" complaint was clearly "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

  Failure on a Government's part to submit such information which is in their hands, without a satisfactory explanation, may not only give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations, but may also reflect negatively on the level of compliance by a respondent State with its obligations under Article 38 § 1 (a) of the Convention (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 66, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97

  SHANAGHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 5108/02

  In all cases, however, the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 91-92, 4 May 2001).

• EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51534/08

  GAKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the above, and to the conclusions as to the State's responsibility for the abduction (see paragraph 366 above), the Court finds that the allegedly incomplete nature of certain documents and information did not prevent it from examining the application (see Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, § 168, 17 January 2008, and Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 234, ECHR 2011 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05

  DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The Court has also examined a number of cases concerning the use of force - firearms or heavier weapons such as grenades, artillery rounds, and aerial bombs or missiles - by military forces (see Güleç v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, §§ 70-73, Reports 1998-IV; Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, §§ 79-81, Reports 1998-IV; Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 174-200, 24 February 2005; Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950/00, §§ 179-201, 24 February 2005; Anık and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, §§ 55-67, 5 June 2007; Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, §§ 130-40, 17 January 2008; Akhmadov and Others v. Russia, no. 21586/02, §§ 98-103, 14 November 2008; Suleymanova v. Russia, no. 9191/06, §§ 78-87, 12 May 2010; Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, §§ 196-203, 2 December 2010; Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, §§ 140-51, 29 March 2011; Kerimova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 13670/03

  ARZU AKHMADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court notes firstly that it is aware of the difficult situation in the Chechen Republic at the material time, which called for exceptional measures on the part of the State to suppress the illegal armed insurgency (see Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, § 178, 24 February 2005, or Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, § 134, 17 January 2008).
• EGMR, 01.08.2013 - 11554/07

  KAYKHAROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the above, and to the conclusions as to the double violation of Article 2 (see paragraphs 161 and 162 above), the Court finds that the allegedly incomplete nature of certain documents and information did not prevent it from examining the case (see Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, § 168, 17 January 2008, and Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 234, ECHR 2011 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43170/04

  DZHAMAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court notes firstly that it is aware of the difficult situation in the Chechen Republic at the material time, which called for exceptional measures on the part of the State to suppress the illegal armed insurgency (see Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, § 178, 24 February 2005, or Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, § 134, 17 January 2008).