Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 2 (substantive asoect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (17)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01

  TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  In these circumstances, and having regard to comparable cases (see, inter alia, ErdoÄ?an and Others, cited above, § 109, and Tanıs and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899/01, § 235, ECHR 2005-VII), the Court, on an equitable basis, awards the first applicant, i.e. the brother of the deceased Ahmet Anık, the sum of EUR 5, 500, and applicants two to eight, i.e. the wife and six children of Ahmet Anık, jointly, the sum of EUR 40, 000 for non-pecuniary damage.
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, §§ 146-147).
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  Finally, law-enforcement officers, such as the police or the gendarmerie, should not be left in a vacuum when performing their duties, whether in the context of a prepared operation or a spontaneous chase of a person perceived to be dangerous: a legal and administrative framework should define the limited circumstances in which law-enforcement officials may use force and firearms, in the light of the international standards which have been developed in this respect (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 59, ECHR 2004-XI).

 
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 137, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 21894/93

  AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  Taking into account the family situation and the age of the deceased Ahmet Anık, the awards made in similar cases (see, inter alia, Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 286, ECHR 2005-II (extracts), Çelikbilek v. Turkey, no. 27693/95, § 119, 31 May 2005, and Koku v. Turkey, no. 27305/95, § 195, 31 May 2005) and deciding on an equitable basis, the Court awards Ahmet Anık's widow and six children, jointly, the sum of EUR 60, 000.
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96

  KELLY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  This is not an obligation of result, but of means (see Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, §§ 96-97, 4 May 2001, and Anguelova, cited above, § 139).
• EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27305/95

  KOKU v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  Taking into account the family situation and the age of the deceased Ahmet Anık, the awards made in similar cases (see, inter alia, Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 286, ECHR 2005-II (extracts), Çelikbilek v. Turkey, no. 27693/95, § 119, 31 May 2005, and Koku v. Turkey, no. 27305/95, § 195, 31 May 2005) and deciding on an equitable basis, the Court awards Ahmet Anık's widow and six children, jointly, the sum of EUR 60, 000.
• EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27693/95

  CELIKBILEK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00

  Taking into account the family situation and the age of the deceased Ahmet Anık, the awards made in similar cases (see, inter alia, Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 286, ECHR 2005-II (extracts), Çelikbilek v. Turkey, no. 27693/95, § 119, 31 May 2005, and Koku v. Turkey, no. 27305/95, § 195, 31 May 2005) and deciding on an equitable basis, the Court awards Ahmet Anık's widow and six children, jointly, the sum of EUR 60, 000.

• EGMR, 25.02.2014 - 651/10

  MAKBULE KAYMAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Compte tenu de la situation familiale, de l'âge et de l'activité du défunt, la Cour estime devoir s'inspirer notamment de la somme accordée au même titre dans l'affaire Koku c. Turquie (no 27305/95, § 194, 31 mai 2005 ; voir, également, Akkum et autres c. Turquie, no 21894/93, § 286, CEDH 2005-II (extraits), Çelikbilek c. Turquie, no 27693/95, § 119, 31 mai 2005, et Anık et autres c. Turquie, no 63758/00, § 91, 5 juin 2007).
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 24604/04

  NIHAYET ARICI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  La force utilisée doit en conséquence être strictement proportionnée aux buts autorisés (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Anık et autres c. Turquie, no 63758/00, § 53, 5 juin 2007, McKerr c. Royaume-Uni, no 28883/95, § 110, CEDH 2001-III, Issaïeva c. Russie, no 57950/00, § 173, 24 février 2005, Akkum et autres c. Turquie, no 21894/93, § 237, CEDH 2005-II (extraits)).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 22746/03

  ÖLMEZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Compte tenu de la situation familiale, de l'âge et de l'activité du défunt, la Cour estime devoir s'inspirer notamment de la somme accordée à ce titre dans l'affaire Koku c. Turquie (no 27305/95, § 194, 31 mai 2005 - voir également, Akkum et autres c. Turquie, no 21894/93, § 286, CEDH 2005-II (extraits), Çelikbilek c. Turquie, no 27693/95, § 119, 31 mai 2005, et Anık et autres c. Turquie, no 63758/00, § 91, 5 juin 2007).

 
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 20583/04

  ZAKRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the findings of a violation of Article 2 in its procedural aspect (see paragraph 90 above), the Court considers that, whilst the complaint under Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 2 is admissible, there is no need for a separate examination of this complaint on its merits (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 84-86, ECHR 2004-XI, and Anık and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, § 86, 5 June 2007).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 20580/04

  TAGIROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the finding of a violation of Article 2 in its procedural aspect (see paragraph 95 above), the Court considers that, whilst the complaint under Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 2 is admissible, there is no need to make a separate examination of this complaint on its merits (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 84-86, ECHR 2004-XI, and Anık and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, § 86, 5 June 2007).
• EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 10796/04

  SHAIPOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the findings of a violation of Article 2 under its procedural head (see paragraph 87 above), the Court considers that, whilst the complaint under Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 2 is admissible, there is no need to make a separate examination of this complaint on its merits (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 84-86, ECHR 2004-XI, and Anık and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, § 86, 5 June 2007).
• EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07

  KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Members of the security forces should not be left in a vacuum when performing their duties, whether in the context of a prepared operation or a spontaneous chase of a person perceived to be dangerous: a legal and administrative framework should define the limited circumstances in which law-enforcement officials may use force and firearms, in the light of the international standards which have been developed in this respect (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 58 and 59, ECHR 2004-XI, and Anik and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, § 54 in fine, 5 June 2007).
• EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 61808/08

  GÜVENER c. TURQUIE

  Ainsi, dans l'affaire Anik et autres c. Turquie (no 63758/00, §§ 76-77, 5 juin 2007), où les requérants, après le prononcé de la décision de non-lieu, ne s'étaient vu remettre aucun document du dossier à l'exception de leurs propres dépositions, la Cour a conclu à une violation de l'article 2 de la Convention au motif que le non-lieu ne pouvait être effectivement contesté sans connaissance préalable des éléments du dossier d'instruction.
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 30086/05

  DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The Court has also examined a number of cases concerning the use of force - firearms or heavier weapons such as grenades, artillery rounds, and aerial bombs or missiles - by military forces (see Güleç v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, §§ 70-73, Reports 1998-IV; Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, §§ 79-81, Reports 1998-IV; Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 174-200, 24 February 2005; Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950/00, §§ 179-201, 24 February 2005; Anık and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, §§ 55-67, 5 June 2007; Khatsiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 5108/02, §§ 130-40, 17 January 2008; Akhmadov and Others v. Russia, no. 21586/02, §§ 98-103, 14 November 2008; Suleymanova v. Russia, no. 9191/06, §§ 78-87, 12 May 2010; Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, §§ 196-203, 2 December 2010; Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, §§ 140-51, 29 March 2011; Kerimova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 6458/03

  WOLF-SORG c. TURQUIE

  Demzufolge muss die angewendete Gewalt in Bezug auf die berechtigten Ziele strikt angemessen sein (siehe unter vielen anderen Anik und andere vs. Türkei, Nr. 63758/00, § 53, 5. Juni 2007, McKerr vs. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 28883/95, § 110, CEDH 2001-III, Issaïeva vs. Russland, Nr. 57950/00, § 173, 24. Feb.
• EGMR, 26.02.2008 - 43443/98

  MANSUROGLU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 4936/12

  TOMAC c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 24268/08

  KLEIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 47319/11 (anhängig)

  YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 18.09.2018 - 36724/10

  KOLOBYCHKO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA, RUSSIE ET UKRAINE
• EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 28008/14

  KRIVOLUTSKAYA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 5428/05

  YUSUPOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA