Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARAJANOV CONTRE « L'EX-RÉPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACÉDOINE »

  Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARAJANOV AGAINST \

  Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2229/15
• EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 2229/15

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARAJANOV v. \

  Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARAJANOV v. \

  [MAC] Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARAJANOV v. \

  [MAC] Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARAJANOV v. \

  [ALB] Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2229/15
• EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 2229/15

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2229/15

  In that connection it observes that it has already held that lustration measures directly affect the Article 8 rights of the persons concerned (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 46, ECHR 2000-V; Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 48, Series A no. 116; Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania, nos.
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2229/15

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 50421/08

  SIDABRAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2229/15

  50421/08 and 56213/08, § 49, 23 June 2015).
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 34499/06

  PERIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2229/15

  In that regard, the Court notes that while Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, and Peric v. Croatia, no. 34499/06, § 17, 27 March 2008).

• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13

  MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE

  The cases in which it has found a breach of the respective Article purely owing to the lack of a legitimate aim are rarer still (see Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, §§ 117-18, 23 October 2008; Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512/04, §§ 73-74, 12 February 2009; P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08, § 133, 30 October 2012; and Karajanov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 2229/15, §§ 75-77, 6 April 2017), although in a recent case the Grand Chamber found an absence of legitimate aim and yet went on to examine whether the interference had been necessary (see Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, §§ 156-57, ECHR 2016).