Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JÚLIUS PERESZLÉNYI-SERVIS TV-VIDEO v. SLOVAKIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JÚLIUS PERESZLÉNYI-SERVIS TV-VIDEO v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 287/07

  KENZIE GLOBAL LIMITED LTD v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 25175/15

  It has been the Constitutional Court's long-established practice that neither Article 127, which provides for the individual-complaint procedure, nor any other provision of the Constitution provides the basis for individuals to challenge legislation as being incompatible with the Constitution or with international instruments, including the Convention (see, for example, decision of 7 November 2007, case no. IV. ÚS 287/07).
• EGMR, 13.05.2014 - 1349/12

  L.G.R. AND A.P.R. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 25175/15

  However, to the extent that they could be understood as alleging that the breach of their rights resulted from the way in which the law governed the given matter, they had no remedy at her disposal in that respect since the Constitutional Court considered itself as not having jurisdiction to examine a complaint lodged by natural or legal persons when the determination of the point in issue involved the preliminary question of conflict of legal rules (see Jenisová v. Slovakia, no. 58764/00, §§ 58-60, 3 November 2009; and also Babylonová, cited above, § 44; and L.G.R. and A.P.R. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 1349/12, § 55, 13 May 2014, with further references).
• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 69146/01

  BABYLONOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 25175/15

  Thus, when it comes to an ordinary court, the rule on precedence of international human rights treaties (Article 7 § 5 of the Constitution) appears to be of relevance in particular with a view to ensuring, in so far as possible, an interpretation and application of the existing statutes in compliance with those treaties (see Babylonová v. Slovakia, no. 69146/01, § 19, ECHR 2006-VIII).
• EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 43983/02

  ORANGE SLOVENSKO, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 25175/15

  It is in particular the latter aspect of this case that distinguishes it from Orange Slovensko, a. s. v. Slovakia ((dec.), no. 43983/02, 24 October 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.12.2024 - 56545/21

  RIBÁR v. SLOVAKIA

  To the extent that any individual decisions are at stake that involved an element of interpretation or application of the applicable law or the exercise of any discretionary power, a complaint under Article 127 of the Constitution has been found to constitute a remedy that must be exhausted under the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Orange Slovensko, a.s. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 43983/02, 24 October 2006; also contrast Urbárska Obec Trenčianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258/01, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2007-XIII (extracts), as well as, for illustrative purposes, Július Pereszlényi-Servis TV-Video v. Slovakia (dec.) [Committee], no. 25175/15, § 59, 25 May 2021).