Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
K.K. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to ...
Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)
- famrz.de (Kurzinformation)
Elternstellung bei Leihmutterschaft
- arber-seminare.de (Kurzinformation)
Abstammung und Adoption - Elternstellung bei Leihmutterschaft
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
K.K. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 09.07.2021 - 6697/18
Familiennachzug bei subsidiärem Schutz: Kompromiss zwischen Menschenrechten und …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
In addition, the quality of the parliamentary and judicial review of the necessity of a general measure, such as in the present case the ban on adoption if the persons required to consent to it were paid or received remuneration, is of particular importance, including to the operation of the relevant margin of appreciation (see, among other authorities, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402/12, §§ 117 and 129, 4 April 2018; and M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697/18, §§ 147-49, 9 July 2021).It is a well-established principle of this Court that where the domestic authorities have "carefully examined the facts, applied the relevant human rights standards consistently with the Convention and its case-law, and adequately balanced the individual interests against the public interest in a case, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts" (see M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697/18, § 149, 9 July 2021; Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, § 45, 23 October 2018; Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos.
- EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 71552/17
VALDÍS FJÖLNISDÓTTIR AND OTHERS v. ICELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
Consequently, the Court's task is not to substitute itself for the competent national authorities in determining the most appropriate policy for regulating the complex and sensitive matter of the relationship between intended parents and a child born abroad as a result of commercial surrogacy arrangements (see, for example, Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland, no. 71552/17, § 67, 18 May 2021).Similarly, the Court has recently stated that the Court's task is not to substitute itself for the competent national authorities in determining the most appropriate policy for regulating the complex and sensitive matter of the relationship between intended parents and a child born abroad as a result of commercial surrogacy arrangements (see Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland, no. 71552/17, § 67, 18 May 2021).
- EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012; and Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 88, 7 February 2012).
- EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 7841/14
LEVAKOVIC v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
It is a well-established principle of this Court that where the domestic authorities have "carefully examined the facts, applied the relevant human rights standards consistently with the Convention and its case-law, and adequately balanced the individual interests against the public interest in a case, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts" (see M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697/18, § 149, 9 July 2021; Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, § 45, 23 October 2018; Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. - EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08
Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
In addition, the quality of the parliamentary and judicial review of the necessity of a general measure, such as in the present case the ban on adoption if the persons required to consent to it were paid or received remuneration, is of particular importance, including to the operation of the relevant margin of appreciation (see, among other authorities, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402/12, §§ 117 and 129, 4 April 2018; and M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697/18, §§ 147-49, 9 July 2021). - EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 65941/11
LABASSEE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
Making its assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41 of the Convention, it awards each of those applicants EUR 5, 000 under this head (see, inter alia, Mennesson v. France, no. 65192/11, § 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Labassee v. France, no. 65941/11, § 85, 26 June 2014). - EGMR, 04.04.2018 - 56402/12
CORREIA DE MATOS c. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
In addition, the quality of the parliamentary and judicial review of the necessity of a general measure, such as in the present case the ban on adoption if the persons required to consent to it were paid or received remuneration, is of particular importance, including to the operation of the relevant margin of appreciation (see, among other authorities, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402/12, §§ 117 and 129, 4 April 2018; and M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697/18, §§ 147-49, 9 July 2021). - EGMR, 24.03.2022 - 30254/18
A.M. v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 25212/21
The States must in principle be afforded a wide margin of appreciation regarding matters which raise delicate moral and ethical questions on which there is no consensus at European level (see, inter alia, Mennesson v. France, no. 65192/11, §§ 78-79, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others, cited above, § 70; and A.M. v. Norway, no. 30254/18, § 131, 24 March 2022).
- OLG Frankfurt, 12.12.2023 - 2 UF 33/23
Stiefkindadoption trotz Leihmutterschaft möglich
Es kommt dann nicht darauf an, ob der rechtliche Vater auch genetischer Vater des Kindes ist und ob die Annehmende selbst die Spenderin der Eizelle war, weil im Einklang mit der Rechtsprechung des EuGHMR (Beschluss vom 6.12.2022, Beschwerde Nr. 25212/21) in erster Linie auf das Wohl des Kindes abzustellen ist, für das die Bindung zu seinen sozialen Eltern zentral ist.Nach Auffassung des EuGHMR (Beschluss vom 6. Dezember 2022, Beschwerde Nr. 25212/21, FamRZ 2023, S. 615 ff.) genießt das Kindeswohl auch bei Leihmutterschaften im Rahmen einer Stiefkindadoption eindeutig Vorrang.
- EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 58817/15
D.B. ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
En atteste notamment la pratique de la Cour consistant à interroger les parties, au stade de la communication de requêtes individuelles, sur la prise en compte des avis consultatifs par les autorités de l'ensemble des États parties (voir, par exemple, S.C. et autres c. Suisse, no 26848/18 ; A.M. c. Norvège, no 30254/18 ; et K. K. et autres c. Danemark, no 25212/21).