Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LALMAHOMED v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08
• EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 26036/08
• EGMR - 26036/08 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Even so, a Contracting Party which provides for the possibility of an appeal is required to ensure that persons amenable to the law shall enjoy before the appellate court the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 6 (see the above-cited Delcourt judgment, loc. cit., and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 32, Series A no. 86; as more recent examples, Khalfaoui v. France, no. 34791/97, § 37, ECHR 1999-IX; and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 122, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 05.02.2008 - 74420/01

  Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren (Tatprovokation; agent provocateur; V-Mann; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  The right to the fair administration of justice holds so prominent a place in a democratic society that it cannot be sacrificed for the sake of expedience (see Delcourt, loc. cit.; more recently, Ryakib Biryukov v. Russia, no. 14810/02, § 37, ECHR 2008-...; and Ramanauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 74420/01, § 53, ECHR 2008-...).
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  The Court notes at the outset that Article 6 does not compel Contracting Parties to provide appeals in civil or criminal cases (see Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 25, Series A no. 11).

 
• EGMR, 22.06.2000 - 32492/96

  COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 117, ECHR 2000-VII; more recently and mutatis mutandis, Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 105, ECHR 2006-III).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Even so, a Contracting Party which provides for the possibility of an appeal is required to ensure that persons amenable to the law shall enjoy before the appellate court the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 6 (see the above-cited Delcourt judgment, loc. cit., and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 32, Series A no. 86; as more recent examples, Khalfaoui v. France, no. 34791/97, § 37, ECHR 1999-IX; and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 122, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 14810/02

  RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  The right to the fair administration of justice holds so prominent a place in a democratic society that it cannot be sacrificed for the sake of expedience (see Delcourt, loc. cit.; more recently, Ryakib Biryukov v. Russia, no. 14810/02, § 37, ECHR 2008-...; and Ramanauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 74420/01, § 53, ECHR 2008-...).
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87

  PHILIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Having regard to its decision concerning Article 6, the Court takes the view that it does not have to examine the case under Article 13 as its requirements are less strict than, and are here absorbed by, those of Article 6 (see, among many other authorities, Philis v. Greece (no. 1), 27 August 1991, § 67, Series A no. 209; Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos.
• EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 17621/91

  KEMMACHE v. FRANCE (No. 3)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Moreover, as long as the resulting decision is based on a full and thorough evaluation of the relevant factors (Monnell and Morris, § 69), it will escape the scrutiny of the Court; in this connection, the Court reiterates that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; and Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)), as it is not a court of appeal - or, as is sometimes said, a "fourth instance" - from these courts (see, among many other authorities, Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, § 44, Series A no. 296-C; and Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9562/81

  MONNELL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  However, it is quite possible that leave-to-appeal proceedings may comply with the requirements of Article 6, even though the appellant be not given an opportunity to be heard in person by the appeal court, provided that he or she had at least the opportunity to be heard by a first-instance court (see, in particular, Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 58, Series A no. 115; more recently, Sibgatullin v. Russia, no. 32165/02, § 35, 23 April 2009).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 28743/03

  MELNITCHOUK c. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  Moreover, as long as the resulting decision is based on a full and thorough evaluation of the relevant factors (Monnell and Morris, § 69), it will escape the scrutiny of the Court; in this connection, the Court reiterates that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; and Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)), as it is not a court of appeal - or, as is sometimes said, a "fourth instance" - from these courts (see, among many other authorities, Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, § 44, Series A no. 296-C; and Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX).
• EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 34791/97

  KHALFAOUI c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 994/03

  CORNELIS c. PAYS-BAS
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 32165/02

  SIBGATULLIN v. RUSSIA

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LALMAHOMED AGAINST THE NETHERLANDS

  Information given by the government concerning measures taken for the execution of the undertakings attached to the solution of the case (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LALMAHOMED CONTRE LES PAYS-BAS

  Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises pour l'exécution de l'engagement auquel a été subordonnée la solution de l'affaire (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08
• EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 26036/08
• EGMR - 26036/08 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)

• EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 12810/13

  ÇELIK v. THE NETHERLANDS

  The Court has had occasion to note that Article 6 does not compel Contracting Parties to provide appeals in civil or criminal cases (see Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 25, Series A no. 11; more recently, Lalmahomed v. the Netherlands, no. 26036/08, § 34, 22 February 2011).
• EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 15909/13

  VAN DER PUTTEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  The Court has had occasion to note that Article 6 does not compel Contracting Parties to provide appeals in civil or criminal cases (see Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 25, Series A no. 11; more recently, Lalmahomed v. the Netherlands, no. 26036/08, § 34, 22 February 2011).