Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SEREMET v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SEREMET v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 2312/08

  MAKTOUF ET DAMJANOVIC c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  As part of the ICTY's completion strategy, in early 2005 war crimes chambers were set up within the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina ("the State Court") with primacy over other courts in Bosnia and Herzegovina as regards war crimes (for information about that court and its jurisdiction over war crimes cases, see Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, §§ 34-40, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

  BLECIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  The Court reiterates that the provisions of the Convention do not bind a Contracting Party in relation to any act or fact which took place or any situation which ceased to exist before the date of the entry into force of the Convention with respect to that Party; this is an established principle in the Court's case-law based on the general rule of international law (see, for example, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 70, ECHR 2006-III).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

  HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  It is unfortunate that the remains of the applicant's mother have not yet been identified, but this is not sufficient in itself to find a procedural violation of Article 2. Indeed, as the Court has held on numerous occasions (see Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 107, ECHR 2001-III, and Palic, cited above, § 65), the procedural obligation under that Article is not an obligation of result, but of means.

 
• EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  55508/07 and 29520/09, §§ 178-79, ECHR 2013.
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06

  ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  2944/06 et al., § 121, 18 December 2012; Palic, cited above, § 63).
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07

  ASSOCIATION

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  33810/07 and 18817/08, § 97, 24 May 2011; Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 16212/08

  SKENDZIC AND KRZNARIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  59623/08 et al., 3 June 2010; and Skendzic and Krznaric v. Croatia, no. 16212/08, §§ 56-59, 20 January 2011).
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 6518/04

  DOKIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 29620/05

  Lastly, turning to the applicant's substantive complaint under Article 2 against Montenegro and Serbia, the Court has not overlooked the fact that there is much evidence of direct and indirect participation by the VJ forces in military operations in Bosnia and Herzegovina (see Ä�okic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 6518/04, §§ 15-17, 27 May 2010, and the authorities cited therein).

• EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 63543/09

  DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Thus, even though the hearings held before the domestic courts were, in principle, open to the public and the hearing schedules might have been available (see Seremet v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia (dec.), no. 29620/05, § 36, 8 July 2014), the applicants would only have been able to follow the trial as members of the general public, without any specific rights.
• EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 35732/09

  DEMIROVIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  47063/08 et al., § 39, 3 June 2014; Fazlic and Others, cited above, § 37; and Seremet v. Bosnia and Hercegovina (dec.), no. 29620/05, § 35, 8 July 2014).
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 13207/12

  STJEPANOVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  66758/09 et al., § 37, 3 June 2014; Seremet v. Bosnia and Hercegovina (dec.), no. 29620/05, § 35, 8 July 2014; Muratspahic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 31865/06, § 31, 2 September 2014; Demirovic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 35732/09, § 32, 2 September 2014; Zuban and Hamidovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 16503/08

  ZERAJIC AND GOJKOVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  47063/08 et al., § 39, 3 June 2014; Fazlic and Others, cited above, § 37; Seremet v. Bosnia and Hercegovina (dec.), no. 29620/05, § 35, 8 July 2014; Muratspahic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 31865/06, § 31, 2 September 2014; Demirovic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 35732/09, § 32, 2 September 2014; and Zuban and Hamidovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 31865/06

  MURATSPAHIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  47063/08 et al., § 39, 3 June 2014; Fazlic and Others, cited above, § 37; and Seremet v. Bosnia and Hercegovina (dec.), no. 29620/05, § 35, 8 July 2014).