Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YAKIS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 33368/96
• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96
• EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96

  The admissibility of evidence is primarily a matter for regulation by national law and, as a rule, it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them (see the Kostovski v. the Netherlands judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166, p. 19, § 39).
• EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96

  The Court notes that the only remedies which Article 35 § 1 of the Convention requires to be exhausted are those that relate to the breaches alleged; the existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness; and it falls to the respondent State, if it pleads non-exhaustion, to establish that these conditions are satisfied (see, amongst many authorities, the De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, § 39).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YAKIS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 as regards the length of the proceedings Violation of Art. 6-1 as regards independence and impartiality Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 33368/96
• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96
• EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

  However, the Court recalls in this respect that, as it has repeatedly held, Article 6 § 1 imposes on the Contracting States the duty to organise their judicial system in such a way that their courts can meet each of its requirements, including the obligation to hear cases within a reasonable time (see, among other authorities, Pelissier and Sassi v. France [GC], p. 301, § 74, no. 25444/94, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 22.10.1984 - 8790/79

  Sramek ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

  Such a situation seriously affects the confidence which the courts must inspire in a democratic society (see, mutatis mutandis, the Sramek v. Austria judgment of 22 October 1984, Series A no. 84, p. 20, § 42).
• EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

  What is at stake is the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public and above all, as far as criminal proceedings are concerned, in the accused (see, among other authorities, the Hauschild v. Denmark judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, § 48).

• EGMR, 24.02.1993 - 14396/88

  FEY v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

  However, it is not the Court's task to determine in abstracto whether it was necessary to set up such courts in a Contracting State or to review the relevant practice, but to ascertain whether the manner in which one of them functioned infringed the applicant's right to a fair trial (see, among other authorities, the Fey v. Austria judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, § 27, and the İncal judgment cited above, p. 1572, § 70).
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

  Deciding on an equitable basis and having regard to the criteria laid down by its case-law (see, among other authorities, the Demicoli v. Malta judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 210, p. 20, § 49), the Court awards the applicant the overall sum of FRF 20, 000.
• KAG Mainz, 18.07.2012 - M 25/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96

  25/12/2001.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 46213/99

  ÖRS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  La Cour relève à cet égard que tout au long du procès la défense a cherché en vain à contester la véracité des aveux et dépositions litigieux (paragraphes 14 et 18 ci-dessus ; voir Kolu précité et, a contrario, Sahiner c. Turquie (déc.), no 29279/95, 11 janvier 2000 ; Yakıs c. Turquie (déc.), no 33368/96, 11 janvier 2000).
• EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 39708/98

  PAMAK contre la TURQUIE

  Elle constate que, même si le requérant avait soulevé le grief en question devant les juridictions internes, cette démarche aurait été vouée à l'échec, étant donné que la constitution de la cour de sûreté de l'Etat qui fait l'objet de la doléance du requérant avait son fondement dans la législation interne (voir, par exemple, décision sur la recevabilité requête n° 33368/96).