Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARADEMIRCI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 10 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARADEMIRCI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.09.2002 - 37096/97
• EGMR, 25.01.2005 - 37096/97, 37101/97

Wird zitiert von ... (17)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 77551/01

  DAMMANN c. SUISSE

  La condition de prévisibilité se trouve remplie lorsque le justiciable peut savoir, à partir du libellé de la disposition pertinente et, au besoin, à l'aide de son interprétation par les tribunaux, quels actes et omissions engagent sa responsabilité pénale (Karademirci et autres c. Turquie, nos 37096/97 et 37101/97, § 40, CEDH 2005-I).
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 26005/08

  [ENG]

  The Court recalls in this connection that a press communiqué made in public, even where there was a gathering of twenty-five people, was examined under Article 10, rather than Article 11, of the Convention (see Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 26, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 09.05.2018 - 52273/07

  [ENG]

  The Court therefore considers it appropriate to examine the present case from the standpoint of Article 10 of the Convention (see, for a similar approach, Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 26, ECHR 2005-I; Gül and Others v. Turkey, no. 4870/02, § 34, 8 June 2010; Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos.

• EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 52358/15

  GENOV AND SARBINSKA v. BULGARIA

  In the absence of a sufficient basis to assess the quantum of the pecuniary loss actually suffered by the second applicant, her claim under this head must be rejected in full, in application of Rule 60 § 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 49, ECHR 2005-I; Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, § 157, ECHR 2015 (extracts); and Hajibeyli and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 42168/06

  DMITRIYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA

  37096/97 and 37101/97, § 39, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 64772/01

  LEEMPOEL AND S.A. ED. CINE REVUE c. BELGIQUE

  La condition de prévisibilité se trouve remplie lorsque le justiciable peut savoir, à partir du libellé de la disposition pertinente et, au besoin, à l'aide de son interprétation par les tribunaux, quels actes et omissions engagent sa responsabilité pénale (Karademirci et autres c. Turquie, nos 37096/97 et 37101/97, § 40, CEDH 2005-I).
• EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 36370/02

  PIROGLU AND KARAKAYA v. TURKEY

  The Court finds it difficult to see how supporting such a movement could be deemed to amount to the formation of an organisation within the meaning of Section 34. It considers that the domestic courts thus extended the scope of section 34 beyond that which could have been reasonably foreseen in the circumstances of the case (cf. Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 42, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 4870/02

  GÜL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  The Court considers that the applicants' complaints should be examined solely under Article 10 of the Convention (see, Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 26, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 30160/04

  DZHAVADOV v. RUSSIA

  The exercise of the freedoms enshrined in paragraph 1 of Article 10, including the freedom to impart information, may be subject to certain "formalities" or "conditions" (see Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 40, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 38976/18

  YAZICI v. TÜRKIYE

  37096/97 and 37101/97, § 42, ECHR 2005-I; and A.M. v. Turkey [Committee], no. 67199/17, §§ 35-36, 19 October 2021).
• EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 60123/00

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 18.07.2006 - 75615/01

  STEFANEC c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 22766/04

  KARA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 25471/02

  GEMICI c. TURQUIE
• EGMR - 2029/20 (anhängig)

  CIUMAS c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 67199/17

  A.M. v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 1606/03

  SALIHOGLU c. TURQUIE