Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,34165
EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14 (https://dejure.org/2017,34165)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.09.2017 - 41215/14 (https://dejure.org/2017,34165)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. September 2017 - 41215/14 (https://dejure.org/2017,34165)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,34165) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Sonstiges

Papierfundstellen

  • NVwZ 2018, 1781
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (65)Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 18.10.2006 - 46410/99

    Rechtssache ÜNER gegen die NIEDERLANDE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14
    The Tribunal considered the principles established by this Court in Boultif v. Switzerland, no. 54273/00, ECHR 2001-IX, Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006-XII and Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, ECHR 2008.

    Consequently, there were no Rules restricting the decision-making authorities' consideration of the applicant's rights under Article 8 of the Convention, and every decision-making body assessed the proportionality of his deportation with regard to this Court's relevant principles concerning the expulsion of settled migrants (see Boultif, Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006-XII and Maslov, all cited above).

  • EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

    Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14
    40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012).
  • EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12313/86
    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14
    However, it is not necessary for the Court to decide whether he has nevertheless exhausted domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, since it has found that in expulsion cases non-nationals cannot be compared to nationals who have a right of abode in their own country and cannot be expelled from it (see Moustaquim v. Belgium, 18 February 1991, § 49, Series A no. 193 and C. v. Belgium, 7 August 1996, § 37-38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III).
  • EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 47486/06
    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14
    In view of the above considerations and of the Court's conclusions in A.W. Khan v. the United Kingdom, where "having particular regard to the length of time that the applicant has been in the United Kingdom and his very young age at the time of his entry, the lack of any continuing ties to Pakistan, the strength of his ties with the United Kingdom, and the fact that the applicant has not reoffended following his release from prison in 2006, the Court has found that the applicant's deportation from the United Kingdom would not be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued and would therefore not be necessary in a democratic society" (see A.W. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 47486/06, § 50, 12 January 2010)[2], I cannot, without further support by the Government for their contention that the applicant can reasonably be expected to cause disorder or to engage in criminal activities at the present time, conclude that the applicant's deportation would be a proportionate measure.
  • EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 25748/15

    HAMESEVIC v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14
    Consequently, in two recent cases concerning the expulsion of settled migrants, the Court declined to substitute its conclusions for those of the domestic courts, which had thoroughly assessed the applicants' personal circumstances, carefully balanced the competing interests and took into account the criteria set out in its case law, and reached conclusions which were "neither arbitrary nor manifestly unreasonable" (see Hamesevic v. Denmark (dec.), no. 25748/15, § 43, 16 May 2017 and Alam v. Denmark (dec.), no. 33809/15, § 35, 6 June 2017).
  • EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 52335/12

    PEACOCK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14
    As the human rights and fundamental freedoms defined in the Convention are now part of the law of the United Kingdom, there is no doubt that he could have expressly invoked his rights under Article 14 in these applications (see, for example, Peacock v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 52335/12, 5 January 2016).
  • EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 33809/15

    ALAM v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14
    Consequently, in two recent cases concerning the expulsion of settled migrants, the Court declined to substitute its conclusions for those of the domestic courts, which had thoroughly assessed the applicants' personal circumstances, carefully balanced the competing interests and took into account the criteria set out in its case law, and reached conclusions which were "neither arbitrary nor manifestly unreasonable" (see Hamesevic v. Denmark (dec.), no. 25748/15, § 43, 16 May 2017 and Alam v. Denmark (dec.), no. 33809/15, § 35, 6 June 2017).
  • EGMR, 09.07.2021 - 6697/18

    Syrien: Wartefrist von 3 Jahren für Familienzusammenführung widerspricht Artikel …

    human rights standards consistently with the Convention and its case-law, and adequately balanced the individual interests against the public interest in a case, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see recent case-law on Article 8 in relation to the expulsion of settled migrants, for example, Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, § 45, 23 October 2018, and its reference to Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215/14, § 76, 14 September 2017).
  • EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 23887/16

    MZI c. SUISSE

    En revanche, s'il s'avère que les autorités internes ont procédé à un examen suffisant et convaincant des faits et considérations pertinents, y englobant une pesée adéquate entre les intérêts personnels du requérant et les intérêts plus généraux de la société, il n'appartient pas à la Cour de se substituer à l'appréciation faite par celles-ci, y compris par rapport à l'examen de la proportionnalité de la mesure litigieuse, sauf s'il existe des raisons importantes pour le faire (voir, dans ce sens, Ndidi c. Royaume-Uni, no 41215/14, § 76, 14 septembre 2017, Hamesevic c. Danemark (déc.), no 25748/15, § 43, 16 mai 2017 and Alam c. Danemark (déc.), no 33809/15, § 35, 6 juin 2017).
  • EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 14065/15

    Lacatus ./. Schweiz - Bettelverbot unverhältnismäßig

    La Cour rappelle également que dès lors que les conclusions des autorités n'apparaissent ni arbitraires ni manifestement déraisonnables, il ne lui appartient pas de se substituer à l'appréciation faite par elles, y compris par rapport à l'examen de la proportionnalité de la mesure litigieuse (voir, dans ce sens, Von Hannover c. Allemagne (no 2) [GC], nos 40660/08 et 60641/08, § 105, CEDH 2012, Hamesevic c. Danemark (déc.), no 25748/15, § 43, 16 mai 2017, Alam c. Danemark (déc.), no 33809/15, § 35, 6 juin 2017, Ndidi c. Royaume-Uni, no 41215/14, § 76, 14 septembre 2017, et Levakovic c. Danemark, no 7841/14, § 45, 23 octobre 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht