Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GAYDUKOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GAYDUKOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10

  It reaches the similar conclusion regarding the complaint about the applicant's unlawful detention between 6 and 11 November 2009, as it has previously examined such questions extensively in over twenty cases against Russia (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 124-158, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, §§ 62-72, 2 March 2006; Korchuganova v. Russia, no. 75039/01, §§ 46-64, 8 June 2006).
• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75039/01

  KORCHUGANOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10

  It reaches the similar conclusion regarding the complaint about the applicant's unlawful detention between 6 and 11 November 2009, as it has previously examined such questions extensively in over twenty cases against Russia (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 124-158, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, §§ 62-72, 2 March 2006; Korchuganova v. Russia, no. 75039/01, §§ 46-64, 8 June 2006).
• EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

  SULWINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10

  To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spółka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).

• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 18369/07

  JOSIPOVIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10

  75025/01 et al., 23 March 2006, and Josipović v. Serbia (dec.), no. 18369/07, 4 March 2008).
• EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 55669/00

  NAKHMANOVICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10

  It reaches the similar conclusion regarding the complaint about the applicant's unlawful detention between 6 and 11 November 2009, as it has previously examined such questions extensively in over twenty cases against Russia (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 124-158, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, §§ 62-72, 2 March 2006; Korchuganova v. Russia, no. 75039/01, §§ 46-64, 8 June 2006).
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  ZHEREBIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 4903/10

  Having regard to the recurrent nature of this grievance (see Zherebin and 9 Other Applications (dec.), no. 51445/09, § 3, 13 November 2012), the Court finds it to be the subject of its well-established case-law.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG Aachen, 15.04.2013 - 2 L 145/13

  Möglichkeit einer Abschiebungsanordnung auch bei Rücknahme des Asylantrags vor …

  Rn. 10 vgl. dazu insgesamt: Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG), Urteil vom 14. Mai 1996 - 2 BvR 1938/93 u.a. -, juris Rz. 180, 234, Beschlüsse vom 15. Juli 2010 - 2 BvR 1460/10 - und vom 8. September 2009 - 2 BvQ 56/09 u.a. -, juris; EuGH, Urteil vom 21. Dezember 2011 - C 411/10 und C 4903/10 - (N.S. und M.E. vs. UK), juris; EGMR, Urteil vom 21. Januar 2011 - 30696/09 - (M.S.S. v.s. Belgien/Griechenland); OVG NRW, Beschluss vom 11. Oktober 2011 - 14 B 1011/11.A - , juris Rz. 11; OVG Lüneburg, Beschluss vom 2. Mai 2012 - 13 MC 22/12.