Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OVAKIMYAN v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 52796/08

  It is incumbent on the authorities to institute criminal proceedings and conduct a proper criminal investigation in which the whole range of investigative measures are carried out and which constitutes an effective remedy for victims of police ill-treatment under domestic law (see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 129 and 132-36, 24 July 2014; and, more recently, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, §§ 57-61, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, §§ 35-38, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 67-72, 6 October 2015; and Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 44-45, 8 October 2015, in which the Government acknowledged a violation under the procedural aspect of Article 3).
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 52796/08

  It is incumbent on the authorities to institute criminal proceedings and conduct a proper criminal investigation in which the whole range of investigative measures are carried out and which constitutes an effective remedy for victims of police ill-treatment under domestic law (see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 129 and 132-36, 24 July 2014; and, more recently, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, §§ 57-61, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, §§ 35-38, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 67-72, 6 October 2015; and Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 44-45, 8 October 2015, in which the Government acknowledged a violation under the procedural aspect of Article 3).
• EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 38887/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 52796/08

  It is incumbent on the authorities to institute criminal proceedings and conduct a proper criminal investigation in which the whole range of investigative measures are carried out and which constitutes an effective remedy for victims of police ill-treatment under domestic law (see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 129 and 132-36, 24 July 2014; and, more recently, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, §§ 57-61, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, §§ 35-38, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 67-72, 6 October 2015; and Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 44-45, 8 October 2015, in which the Government acknowledged a violation under the procedural aspect of Article 3).

• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 57519/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 52796/08

  It is incumbent on the authorities to institute criminal proceedings and conduct a proper criminal investigation in which the whole range of investigative measures are carried out and which constitutes an effective remedy for victims of police ill-treatment under domestic law (see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 129 and 132-36, 24 July 2014; and, more recently, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, §§ 57-61, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, §§ 35-38, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 67-72, 6 October 2015; and Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 44-45, 8 October 2015, in which the Government acknowledged a violation under the procedural aspect of Article 3).
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 31316/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 52796/08

  It is incumbent on the authorities to institute criminal proceedings and conduct a proper criminal investigation in which the whole range of investigative measures are carried out and which constitutes an effective remedy for victims of police ill-treatment under domestic law (see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 129 and 132-36, 24 July 2014; and, more recently, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, §§ 57-61, 5 February 2015; Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, §§ 35-38, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 67-72, 6 October 2015; and Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 44-45, 8 October 2015, in which the Government acknowledged a violation under the procedural aspect of Article 3).
• EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 12008/06

  BORISOV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 52796/08

  There has therefore been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Aleksey Borisov v. Russia, no. 12008/06, §§ 85-87, 16 July 2015).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.02.2025 - 11075/17

  SHARINA v. RUSSIA and 15 other applications

  32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning detention in a metal cage during court hearings; Shtukaturov v. Russia, no. 44009/05, §§ 135-149, ECHR 2008, regarding hindrance in the exercise of the right of individual petition; Ruslan Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 5425/11, §§ 72-83, 4 June 2015, relating to delayed review of conviction by a higher court; Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), with regard to disproportionate measures against participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO); Ovakimyan v. Russia, no. 52796/08, § 40, 54, 57, 21 February 2017, regarding unlawful detention; Stomakhin v. Russia, no. 52273/07, §§ 73-134, 9 May 2018, as to criminal conviction for inciting to hatred and extremist activity; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.

  Mittelfranken/BayTTV; 30.10.2003; 5/03|AG Mannheim; 17.03.2003; F 5/03">05/03/2019 from 4 p.m. to 9.50 p.m., raised on 07/09/2019; detention (criminal) for more than three hours without written record (see Ovakimyan v. Russia, no. 52796/08, § 40, 54, 57, 21 February 2017).

• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 57269/14

  SAMESOV v. RUSSIA

  The mere fact of the investigative authority's refusal to open a criminal investigation into credible allegations of police ill-treatment has been considered indicative of the State's failure to comply with its obligation under Article 3 to carry out an effective investigation (see Lyapin, cited above, §§ 129 and 132-36 and follow-up cases, in which the Government acknowledged a violation under the procedural aspect of Article 3, such as Gorshchuk v. Russia, no. 31316/09, §§ 35-38, 6 October 2015; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, §§ 67-72, 6 October 2015; Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 44-45, 8 October 2015; and Ovakimyan v. Russia, no. 52796/08, §§ 42, 49-53, 21 February 2017; and also many other authorities, in which a violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb was found, including Leonid Petrov v. Russia, no. 52783/08, §§ 78-81, 11 October 2016; Morgunov v. Russia, no. 32546/08, §§ 38-39, 11 April 2017; Kondakov v. Russia, no. 31632/10, §§ 33-34, 2 May 2017; Sitnikov v. Russia, no. 14769/09, §§ 38-39, 2 May 2017; Olisov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 10825/09

  OLISOV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  The Court reiterates that it has dealt with many applications against Russia concerning ill-treatment in police custody that have exposed a systemic problem of delay in documenting the arrest and the status of detained individuals as suspects, during which time detainees were interviewed without access to a lawyer, were denied other rights of suspects, and fell victim to police abuse (see, among other authorities, Razzakov v. Russia, no. 57519/09, §§ 66-73, 5 February 2015, Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 52-54, 8 October 2015, and Ovakimyan v. Russia, no. 52796/08, §§ 54-58, 21 February 2017 (not final), in which cases the Government acknowledged a violation of Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention; Aleksandr Andreyev v. Russia, no. 2281/06, §§ 48-51, 23 February 2016, in which the Government acknowledged a violation of Article 5 of the Convention; Leonid Petrov v. Russia, no. 52783/08, §§ 52-55 and 58-60, 11 October 2016; see also Turbylev, cited above, §§ 94-95, assessing the situation under Article 6 of the Convention).
• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 2335/09

  TKACHUK c. RUSSIE

  Ayant conclu à la violation de l'article 3 de la Convention sous ses volets procédural et matériel (paragraphes 104 et 109 ci-dessus), la Cour estime qu'aucun examen séparé du grief tiré d'une ineffectivité de l'enquête relative aux mauvais traitements qui auraient été infligés au requérant ne s'impose sur le terrain de l'article 13 de la Convention (Ovakimyan c. Russie, no 52796/08, § 68, 21 février 2017, Aleksandr Andreyev c. Russie, no 2281/06, § 71, 23 février 2016, et Minikayev c. Russie, no 630/08, § 75, 5 janvier 2016).
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 36620/07

  SHEVTSOVA v. RUSSIA

  Ayant conclu à la violation de l'article 3 de la Convention sous ses volets procédural et matériel (paragraphes 47 et 61 ci-dessus), la Cour estime qu'aucun examen séparé du grief quant à l'existence de voies de recours effectifs ne s'impose sur le terrain de l'article 13 de la Convention (Ovakimyan c. Russie, no 52796/08, § 68, 21 février 2017, Aleksandr Andreyev c. Russie, no 2281/06, § 71, 23 février 2016).