Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VATEVI v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (24)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  In the instant case, the Court considers that the hourly rate of EUR 70 is excessive and that a reduction of the same is appropriate (see, a contrario, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 176 in fine, ECHR 2002-IV, Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 111, 30 January 2003; Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 75, 19 May 2004, and Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, § 111, 23 September 2004, where the Court found an hourly rate of EUR 50 reasonable).
• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

  MELNIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  Furthermore, they have to take into account not only the original application but also the additional documents intended to complete the latter by eliminating initial omissions or obscurities (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 61, 28 March 2006).

• EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 38884/97

  NIKOLOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  In the instant case, the Court considers that the hourly rate of EUR 70 is excessive and that a reduction of the same is appropriate (see, a contrario, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 176 in fine, ECHR 2002-IV, Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 111, 30 January 2003; Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 75, 19 May 2004, and Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, § 111, 23 September 2004, where the Court found an hourly rate of EUR 50 reasonable).
• EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 47877/99

  RACHEVI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  In the instant case, the Court considers that the hourly rate of EUR 70 is excessive and that a reduction of the same is appropriate (see, a contrario, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 176 in fine, ECHR 2002-IV, Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 111, 30 January 2003; Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 75, 19 May 2004, and Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, § 111, 23 September 2004, where the Court found an hourly rate of EUR 50 reasonable).
• EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 25354/94

  NURAY SEN v. TURKEY (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  The Court considers, therefore, that it is not appropriate now to take these matters up separately at this stage (see Melnik, cited above, § 63, Skubenko v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 41152/98, 6 April 2004, and Nuray Sen v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 25354/94, §§ 199-200, 30 March 2004).
• EGMR, 19.05.2004 - 42027/98

  TOTEVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  In the instant case, the Court considers that the hourly rate of EUR 70 is excessive and that a reduction of the same is appropriate (see, a contrario, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 176 in fine, ECHR 2002-IV, Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 111, 30 January 2003; Toteva v. Bulgaria, no. 42027/98, § 75, 19 May 2004, and Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, § 111, 23 September 2004, where the Court found an hourly rate of EUR 50 reasonable).
• EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 77746/01

  KROENITZ v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  Noting its finding of a violation in relation to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see paragraph 45 above), the Court, while finding this complaint to be admissible, considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, there has also been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see Kroenitz v. Poland, no. 77746/01, §§ 36-37, 25 February 2003).
• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 58497/00

  HADJIBAKALOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00

  The relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure in respect of partition-of-property proceedings are summarised in the recent Court's judgment in the case of Hadjibakalov v. Bulgaria (no. 58497/00, §§ 38-40, 8 June 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 37346/05

  FINGER v. BULGARIA

  However, it went on to say that this is just one factor to be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of their length (see Hadjibakalov, cited above, § 50; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, § 40, 28 September 2006; and Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, § 57, 14 February 2008).

  Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, §§ 34-45, 28 September 2006.

• EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 48059/06

  CASES OF FINGER, DIMITROV AND HAMANOV AND 54 OTHER CASES AGAINST BULGARIA

  55956/00.
• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 50954/99

  MASLENKOVI v. BULGARIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender, cited above, and - for a detailed analysis of the relevant issues in a recent case concerning Bulgaria - Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006).

• EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 57641/00

  KOVACHEVA AND HADJIILIEVA v. BULGARIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender, cited above, and - for a detailed analysis of the relevant issues in a recent case concerning Bulgaria - Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006).
• EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 20806/04

  TODOROVA v. BULGARIA (III)

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Bulgaria, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004, Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006 and Kabakchievi v. Bulgaria, no. 8812/07, 6 May 2010).
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 24435/05

  TRIFONOVA v. BULGARIA

  In view of its extensive and clear case law on length of civil proceedings, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004, Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006, and Marinova and Radeva v. Bulgaria, no. 20568/02, 2 July 2009), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 5131/06

  [ENG]

  In view of its extensive and clear case law in respect of the violation of the above mentioned guarantees of Article 6 § 1 of Convention, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006; Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, 14 February 2008, Stankov v. Bulgaria, no. 68490/01, ECHR 2007-VIII and Mihalkov v. Bulgaria, no. 67719/01, 10 April 2008), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of this part of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
• EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 26560/05

  YAKIMOVI v. BULGARIA

  In view of its extensive and clear case law on length of civil proceedings, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006; Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, 14 February 2008), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
• EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 27238/04

  VALCHEV v. BULGARIA

  In view of its extensive and clear case law on length of civil proceedings, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006; Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, 14 February 2008), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
• EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 274/04

  JELEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  In view of its extensive and clear case law on length of civil proceedings, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006; Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, 14 February 2008), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
• EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43009/04

  KANCHEVA c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 31952/05

  DIMITROV v. BULGARIA (II)
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 34686/05

  PRAMATAROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 28936/03

  VELIKIN ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 27937/05

  PETROVI v. BULGARIA (II)
• EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 31695/05

  DOYCHINSKI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 33497/05

  KOSTOVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 8442/05

  LAZAROV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 37596/04

  YORDANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 22956/04

  KARYAGDI v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 59523/00

  SIMIZOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 02.06.2009 - 17366/04

  TANCHEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 17737/05

  ZLATEV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 1113/04

  KRIVENCHEV v. BULGARIA