Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GORGADZE v. GEORGIA

  Art. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (15)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 28369/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 57990/10

  This rule is absolute and does not allow for an individual assessment of how much detail was disclosed (see Balenovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 28369/07, 30 September 2010, and Lesnina Veletrgovina d.o.o. v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 37619/04, 2 March 2010).
• EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07

  BENJOCKI v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 57990/10

  5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009, and Balenovic (cited above)).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 18496/16

  ESKERKHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Baucal-Đorđević and Đorđević v. Serbia (dec.), no. 38540/07, 2 July 2013; Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, 2 September 2014; and Ausad Valimised Mtü v. Estonia (dec.), no. 40631/14, 27 September 2016).

  5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Baucal-Đorđević and Đorđević v. Serbia (dec.), no. 38540/07, 2 July 2013; Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, 2 September 2014; and Ausad Valimised Mtü v. Estonia (dec.), no. 40631/14, 27 September 2016; it also refers to Tsonev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44885/10, § 26, 8 December 2015.

• EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 35511/20

  GHERARDI MARTIRI v. SAN MARINO

  Indeed, the Court has rejected applications as abusive in numerous cases where the applicants or their representatives had intentionally disclosed to the media details from the friendly-settlement negotiations (see Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, § 21, 2 September 2014; Ausad Valimised MTÜ, cited above, § 10; and Tsonev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44885/10, § 27, 8 December 2015).
• EGMR, 09.02.2017 - 25784/09

  CAPSKÝ AND JESCHKEOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The Court has rejected applications as abusive in numerous cases where the applicants or their representatives had intentionally disclosed to the media details from the friendly-settlement negotiations (see Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, § 21, 2 September 2014; Ausad Valimised MTÜ, cited above, § 10; Tsonev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44885/10, § 27, 8 December 2015) or where the applicants referred to the Registry's proposal prepared within the framework of the friendly-settlement negotiations in their application for compensation with the domestic authority (see Hadrabová and Hadrabová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42165/02, 25 September 2007).

• EGMR, 09.02.2017 - 65546/09

  HELDENBURG v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The Court has rejected applications as abusive in numerous cases where the applicants or their representatives had intentionally disclosed to the media details from the friendly-settlement negotiations (see Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, § 21, 2 September 2014; Ausad Valimised MTÜ, cited above, § 10; Tsonev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44885/10, § 27, 8 December 2015) or where the applicants referred to the Registry's proposal prepared within the framework of the friendly-settlement negotiations in their application for compensation with the domestic authority (see Hadrabová and Hadrabová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42165/02, 25 September 2007).
• EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 33566/11

  RAMKOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  In order to be regarded as an abuse of application, the disclosure of confidential information must be intentional and the direct responsibility of the applicant in the disclosure must be established with sufficient certainty (see Arsovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 30206/06, § 40, 15 January 2013 and Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, § 19, 2 September 2014).
• EGMR, 18.06.2026 - 26624/23

  MANDUNDU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

  Pour que la requête soit abusive, au sens de l'article 35 § 3 a) de la Convention, il faut toutefois que la responsabilité directe du requérant ou de son avocat dans la divulgation soit établie avec suffisamment de certitude (voir, par exemple, Koukakis c. Grèce (déc.) [Comité], no 37659/22, 11 juin 2024, §§ 12-14, Khmaladze c. Géorgie (déc.) [Comité], no 29836/19, 23 novembre 2023, §§ 7-11, et Plichta c. Pologne (déc.) [Comité], no 54127/16, 22 octobre 2019, §§ 22-26, ainsi que les références qui y figurent, en particulier Gorgadze c. Géorgie (déc.), no 57990/10, 2 septembre 2014, §§ 18-22, Abbasov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan (déc.), no 36609/08, 28 mai 2013, §§ 28-35, et Barreau et autres c. France (déc.), no 24697/09, 13 décembre 2011 ; voir aussi, précitées, Mătăsaru, § 36, et Mandil).
• EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 40631/14

  AUSAD VALIMISED MTU v. ESTONIA

  The rule that friendly-settlement negotiations are confidential is absolute and does not allow for individual assessment of how much detail has been disclosed (Abbasov and Others v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no 36609/08, § 28, 28 May 2013, and Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no 57990/10, § 18, 2 September 2014, and the case-law cited therein).
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 44885/10

  TSONEV c. BULGARIE

  Cependant, en vertu de sa jurisprudence constante, lorsque les requérants ou leurs avocats révèlent sciemment les détails de la négociation sur un éventuel règlement amiable, la Cour accepte qu'il y a lieu de rejeter la requête pour abus du droit de recours individuel (voir, parmi d'autres, Benjocki et autres c. Serbie (déc.), nos 5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07, 15 décembre 2009 ; Mandil c. France (déc.), no 67037/09, 13 décembre 2011 ; Deceuninck c. France (déc.), no 47447/08, 13 décembre 2011 ; Barreau et autres c. France (déc.), no 24697/09, 13 décembre 2011 ; Abbasov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan (déc.), no 36609/08, 28 mai 2013 ; Gorgadze c. Géorgie (déc.), no 57990/10, 2 septembre 2014).
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 29836/19

  KHMALADZE v. GEORGIA

  The rule that friendly-settlement negotiations are confidential is absolute and does not allow for individual assessment of how much detail has been disclosed (see, among many others, Lesnina Veletrgovina d.o.o. v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 37619/04, 2 March 2010; Abbasov and Others v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 36609/08, § 28, 28 May 2013, and Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, § 18, 2 September 2014, and the case-law cited therein).
• EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2000/09

  ZÁKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Deceuninck v. France (dec.), no. 47447/08, 13 December 2011; Barreau and Others v. France (dec.), no. 24697/09, 13 December 2011; Abbasov and Others, cited above; and Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, 2 September 2014).
• EGMR, 17.02.2026 - 54323/22

  NÉMETH v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 01.04.2025 - 27166/21

  KALANDIA v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 37659/22

  KOUKAKIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 23.03.2021 - 55200/17

  PASSARIS c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 54127/16

  PLICHTA v. POLAND