Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IOSUB CARAS v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 5 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 and P1-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (first applicant) Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (second applicant) Costs and ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 7198/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (12)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 71099/01

  MONORY v. ROMANIA AND HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  The Court reiterates that the mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other's company constitutes a fundamental element of family life and domestic measures hindering such enjoyment amount to an interference with the right protected by Article 8 (see Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, § 70, 5 April 2005).

  The Court finds no indication that the law in question violates the equality clause provided for in Article 5 of Protocol No. 7 (see also Monory v. Romania (dec.), no. 71099/01, 17 February 2004).

• EGMR, 26.06.2003 - 48206/99

  MAIRE v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  Having regard to the sums awarded in comparable cases (see Ignaccolo-Zenide, § 117; Sylvester, § 84; Iglesias Gil and A.U.I., § 67, and Monory, § 96, cited above, Sophia Gudrun Hansen v. Turkey, no. 36141/97, § 115, 23 September 2003, as well as Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 82, ECHR 2003-VII), and making an assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41, the Court awards the first applicant EUR 20, 000 under this head.
• EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 36141/97

  HANSEN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  Having regard to the sums awarded in comparable cases (see Ignaccolo-Zenide, § 117; Sylvester, § 84; Iglesias Gil and A.U.I., § 67, and Monory, § 96, cited above, Sophia Gudrun Hansen v. Turkey, no. 36141/97, § 115, 23 September 2003, as well as Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 82, ECHR 2003-VII), and making an assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41, the Court awards the first applicant EUR 20, 000 under this head.

• EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 31061/96

  CERNECKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  The Court recalls that it has previously decided that Article 5 of Protocol No. 7 essentially imposes a positive obligation on States to provide a satisfactory legal framework under which spouses have equal rights and obligations concerning such matters as their relations with their children (see Cernecki v. Austria, (dec.), no. 31061/96, 11 July 2000).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  They relied on authorities such as Winterwerp v. the Netherlands (judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 20, § 46), Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain (no. 56673/00, § 61, ECHR 2003-V) and De Diego Nafría v. Spain (no. 46833/99, § 39, 14 March 2002).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  With the Government, the Court recalls that it is not within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34; and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  In such cases, the standing as the natural parent suffices to afford him or her the necessary power to apply to the Court on the child's behalf, too, in order to protect the child's interests (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 138, ECHR 2000-VIII, Iglesias Gil et Urcera Iglesias v. Spain (dec.), no. 56673/00, 5 March 2002 and Sylvester v. Austria (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  With the Government, the Court recalls that it is not within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34; and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90

  McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  If they have not, there will have been a failure to respect their family life and the interference resulting from the decision will not be capable of being regarded as "necessary" within the meaning of Article 8." (see the... W. v. the United Kingdom judgment [of 8 July 1987, Series A no. 121-A], pp. 28 and 29, §§ 62 and 64, McMichael v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B, p. 55, § 87 and Ignaccolo-Zenide, cited above, § 99).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 32842/96

  NUUTINEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04

  The positive obligations imposed on States by Article 8 include taking measures to ensure a parent's reunification with his or her child (see Ignaccolo-Zenide, cited above, § 94, and Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 127, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 16.09.2003 - 41134/98

  GLOD c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46833/99

  DE DIEGO NAFRIA c. ESPAGNE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen