Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YESUFA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.04.2003 - 52853/99

  D (A), Türken, Ausweisung, Straftäter, Besonderer Ausweisungsschutz, Unbefristete …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 7347/08

  "57. Even if Article 8 of the Convention does not therefore contain an absolute right for any category of alien not to be expelled, the Court's case-law amply demonstrates that there are circumstances where the expulsion of an alien will give rise to a violation of that provision (see, for example, the judgments in Moustaquim v. Belgium, Beldjoudi v. France and Boultif v. Switzerland, [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yilmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v. Germany, 32231/02, 27 October 2005).
• EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 7347/08

  In the present case, the applicant has not suggested that any additional elements of dependence exist in his relationship with his mother or siblings and the Court therefore finds that these relationships do not amount to "family life" for the purposes of Article 8. Moreover, the applicant has submitted no evidence to demonstrate that his relationship with his girlfriend has sufficient constancy to create family ties (Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 30, Series A no. 297-C).
• EGMR, 27.10.2005 - 32231/02

  Ausweisung, Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 7347/08

  "57. Even if Article 8 of the Convention does not therefore contain an absolute right for any category of alien not to be expelled, the Court's case-law amply demonstrates that there are circumstances where the expulsion of an alien will give rise to a violation of that provision (see, for example, the judgments in Moustaquim v. Belgium, Beldjoudi v. France and Boultif v. Switzerland, [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yilmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v. Germany, 32231/02, 27 October 2005).

• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 56811/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 7347/08

  "57. Even if Article 8 of the Convention does not therefore contain an absolute right for any category of alien not to be expelled, the Court's case-law amply demonstrates that there are circumstances where the expulsion of an alien will give rise to a violation of that provision (see, for example, the judgments in Moustaquim v. Belgium, Beldjoudi v. France and Boultif v. Switzerland, [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yilmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v. Germany, 32231/02, 27 October 2005).
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 10606/07

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 7347/08

  In this respect the present case resembles that of Joseph Grant v. the United Kingdom, no. 10606/07, 8 January 2009, in which the Court held that the applicant's removal did not violate his rights under Article 8 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 31519/96

  KWAKYE-NTI ET DUFIE contre les PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 7347/08

  The Court recalls that in immigration cases it has held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 97, ECHR 2003 X; Kwakye-Nti and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 41548/06

  Abschiebung von hier geborenem Tunesier: Täter war nicht genug verwurzelt

  Es mag zwar zutreffen, dass das Amtsgericht dennoch eine unbedingte Jugendstrafe verhängt hat, gleichwohl kann nicht angenommen werden, dass es sich hierbei um in der Jugendzeit begangene Delikte handelt (Onur ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 27319/07, Rdnr. 55, 17. Februar 2009, Grant ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 32570/07, Rdnr. 40, CEDH 2006­VII, Yesufa ./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Nr. 7347/08, 26. Januar 2010 und im Gegensatz hierzu die vorgenannte Rechtssache Maslov, Rdnr. 81).
• EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 40601/05

  Rechtssache M. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Es mag zwar zutreffen, dass das Amtsgericht dennoch eine unbedingte Jugendstrafe verhängt hat, gleichwohl kann nicht erachtet werden, dass es sich hierbei um in der Jugendzeit begangene Delikte handelt (Onur ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 27319/07, Rdnr. 55, 17. Februar 2009, Grant ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 10606/07, Rdnr. 40, 8. Januar 2009, Yesufa ./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Nr. 7347/08, 26. Januar 2010 und zum Beweis des Gegenteils o.a. Maslov, Rdnr. 81).
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 20203/11

  [ENG]

  The applicant and his wife must therefore have been aware of the precarious nature of the applicant's resident status in Austria (see Yesufa v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 7347/08, 26 January 2010, and Arvelo Aponte, cited above, § 59) and thus could not have had any legitimate expectation of the applicant being able to remain in the country at the time they married.