Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KIMLYA ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 9 lu à la lumière de l'art. 11 Préjudice moral - réparation (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 9 read in the light of Art. 11 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 76836/01
• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01, 32782/03

Wird zitiert von ... (21)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 05.03.2024 - 64220/19

  Föderation der Aleviten-Gemeinden in Österreich ./. Österreich

  76836/01 and 32782/03, § 86, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13

  K.B. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Having regard to the specific circumstances of the present case which concerns an evolving situation, and taking into account that the case is still pending, the Court does not consider it necessary to indicate individual measures that the State has to adopt for the execution of the present judgment (compare Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 109, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 30.06.2011 - 8916/05
  Plus récemment, dans le cadre d'un examen de l'article 11 à la lumière de l'article 9, 1a Cour a considéré que le risque de voir ses avoirs bancaires gelés et ses biens saisis est préjudiciable au fonctionnement des activités religieuses de la Branche de l'Armée du Salut de Moscou (Branche de Moscou de l'Armée du salut c. Russie, no 72881/01, § 73, CEDH 2006-XI ; voir, également, mutatis mutandis, Kimlya et autres c. Russie, nos 76836/01 et 32782/03, § 85, ECHR 2009-... ).

• EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 72874/01

  UNION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  76836/01 and 32782/03, § 81, ECHR 2009; Magyar Keresztény Mennonita Egyház and Others v. Hungary, nos.
• EGMR, 12.04.2018 - 48044/10

  BEKTASHI COMMUNITY AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" and …

  In the Court's view, exclusive reliance on such a formal ground, without reference being made to any reason related to the applicant association's operation before the 2007 Act had entered into force, can hardly appear justified in respect of religious associations which are long established in the country and familiar to the competent authorities, as is the case with the applicant association (see paragraphs 10-15 and 32 above, Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 100, ECHR 2009, and Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825/98, § 98, 31 July 2008).
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 3532/07

  ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Secondly, besides freedom of religion and non-discrimination it also concerns an alleged violation of freedom of association under Article 11 of the Convention, which safeguards associative life against unjustified State interference (see Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 81, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION CENTRE OF KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETIES IN …

  The action plan provided for the participation of State officials, educators, and representatives of "traditional denominations" (as listed in the Preamble to the Religions Act, see Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 49, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 08.06.2021 - 48329/19

  ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION "ROMUVA" v. LITHUANIA

  In previous cases, when determining whether an applicant organisation could be described as "religious", the Court, being mindful of the subsidiary nature of its role, relied primarily on the assessment of the domestic authorities in that respect (see Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, §§ 79-81, ECHR 2009, and İzzettin Doğan and Others, cited above, §§ 69-70).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 31706/10

  [FRE]

  Par analogie avec la prudence dont la Cour fait preuve quant à la question de savoir si un ensemble de convictions et les pratiques associées peuvent ou non être considérés comme une « religion'au sens de l'article 9 de la Convention, nous estimons qu'en l'espèce la Cour doit également s'en remettre à l'appréciation des autorités internes en la matière et décider sur cette base s'il convient d'examiner les griefs sous l'angle de l'article 9 (Kimlya et autres c. Russie, nos 76836/01 et 32782/03, § 79, CEDH 2009).
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 34960/04

  THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

  76836/01 and 32782/03, § 109, 1 October 2009) and with the State's duty to abide by those conclusions and their spirit (see Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) (no. 2), cited above, § 90).
• EGMR - 15962/15 (anhängig)

  SAMARA LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  OSSEWAARDE v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 37508/12

  CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 56751/13

  ÉGLISE ORTHODOXE VIEILLE-CALENDARISTE DE BULGARIE ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 8916/05

  ASSOCIATION LES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 17.11.2022 - 74852/14

  ILYIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 64403/11

  KUROPYATNIK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 76620/14

  ÉGLISE ORTHODOXE INDÉPENDANTE ET ZAHARIEV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 76836/01

  KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 77185/01

  BOYCHEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE