Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 8 EMRK; Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG; Art. 10 GG
  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Recht auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung (Datenschutz; Informationsanspruch über von Seiten des Staates gespeicherte personenbezogene Daten; Ausnahmen zum Schutz der nationalen Sicherheit: Einsatz von Geheimdiensten; margin of appreciation; ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BRINKS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 9940/04

  Rn. 77 As regards the remaining question whether the limitation of the applicant's access to information held on him by the BVD was "necessary in a democratic society", the Court reiterates that the notion of necessity implies that the interference corresponds to a pressing social need and, in particular, that it is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued, and that - although the national authorities enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing the pressing social need in a particular case - there should exist adequate and effective guarantees against abuse, since a system of secret surveillance designed to protect national security entails the risk of undermining or even destroying democracy on the ground of defending it (see Leander v. Sweden , judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, p. 25, §§ 58-60).
• EKMR, 04.03.1991 - 14084/88

  V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 9940/04

  14084/88, 14085/88, 14086/88, 14087/88, 14088/88, 14109/88, 14173/88, 14195/88, 14196/88 and 14197/88), the European Commission of Human Rights found that the provisions of the Royal Decree of 5 August 1972 were incompatible with the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention, in that these legal rules lacked precision and adequate safeguards.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.04.2026 - 45864/22

  KANEV AND BULGARIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE v. BULGARIA

  Firstly, the courts that dealt with those proceedings did not see the material (if there was indeed any) to which the Agency's decision related (contrast Brinks v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 9940/04, 5 April 2005, and Das Universelle Leben Aller Kulturen Weltweit e.V. v. Germany (dec.), no. 60369/11, § 24, 17 November 2015).
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 60369/11

  DAS UNIVERSELLE LEBEN ALLER KULTUREN WELTWEIT E.V. v. GERMANY

  Was die Frage betrifft, ob die Verweigerung der Informationsoffenlegung durch das Bundesverwaltungsamt einen Eingriff in das Recht des Beschwerdeführers auf Achtung seines Privatlebens darstellte, weist der Gerichtshof erneut darauf hin, dass Artikel 8 nach allgemeiner Auffassung auf Angelegenheiten anwendbar ist, in denen es um Informationen geht, die eine öffentliche Behörde über einzelne Personen gesammelt hat (…Rotaru./. Rumänien [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 28341/95, Rdnr. 46, ECHR 2000-V;… Leander./. Schweden, 26. März 1987, Rdnr. 48, Serie A Band 116; Brinks./. Niederlande (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 9940/04, 5. April 2005).
• EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 4900/06

  A. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  An overview of the relevant domestic law and practice as regards the Netherlands intelligence and security services is set out in the Court's decision on admissibility in the case of Brinks v. the Netherlands (no. 9940/04, 5 April 2005).
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 25424/05

  RAMZY v. THE NETHERLANDS

  An overview of the relevant domestic law and practice as regards the Netherlands intelligence and security services is set out in the Court's decision on admissibility in the case of Brinks v. the Netherlands (no. 9940/04, 5 April 2005).