Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I.G., AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 12, Art. 13, Art. 14+3, Art. 14, Art. 14+8, Art. 14+12 MRK
  Admissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 15966/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04

  Furthermore, the rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention have been found to comprise positive obligations and procedural safeguards which States are required to comply with (see, mutatis mutandis, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149-151, ECHR 2003-XII, with further references, and Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 92, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04

  Furthermore, the rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention have been found to comprise positive obligations and procedural safeguards which States are required to comply with (see, mutatis mutandis, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149-151, ECHR 2003-XII, with further references, and Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 92, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

  AZINAS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04

  Among other things the Court must examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected of him or her to exhaust available domestic remedies (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 67, 28 March 2006; and Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos.

• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

  MELNIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04

  Among other things the Court must examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected of him or her to exhaust available domestic remedies (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 67, 28 March 2006; and Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 9852/03

  HUMMATOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04

  9852/03 and 13413/04, § 91, 29 November 2007).
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 6973/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 15966/04

  Moreover, an applicant who has used a remedy which is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were also available but probably no more likely to be successful (see Adamski v. Poland (dec.), no. 6973/04, 27 January 2009, with further references).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen