Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,32456
EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32456)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28.06.2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32456)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28. Juni 2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32456)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,32456) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (59)Zitiert selbst (22)

  • EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    However, it is only exceptionally that a violation, by its very nature, does not leave any real choice as to the measures required to remedy it (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 202, ECHR 2004-II).
  • EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Moreover, such means would frequently be preferable to the reopening of proceedings in view of other equally important considerations, such as the principle of legal certainty, respect of res judicata or the interests of bona fide third parties (see Almeida Santos, cited above, § 12; and Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 57, ECHR 2015).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

    RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    The Court notes at the outset that since its first judgment concerning a violation of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing of a final domestic judgment by way of the supervisory review procedure (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, ECHR 2003-IX), it has continued to find similar violations on account of the same structural deficiency.
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

    COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    The Court may then decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

    SULWINSKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    To this end, the Court has examined the Government's declaration carefully in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spółka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 8549/06

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Thus, considering the Government's offer as a whole and having particular regard to the sum proposed in respect of non-pecuniary damage (compare and contrast with Ryabov and 151 other "Privileged pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 4563/07 and 151 others., § 23, 17 December 2009, and Streltsov and other "Novocherkassk military pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 8549/06 and 86 others, § 96, 29 July 2010), the Court finds no reason to consider that the compensation offered to Mr Ryabkin constitutes inadequate or otherwise unreasonable redress for the violations of his Convention rights.
  • EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4563/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Thus, considering the Government's offer as a whole and having particular regard to the sum proposed in respect of non-pecuniary damage (compare and contrast with Ryabov and 151 other "Privileged pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 4563/07 and 151 others., § 23, 17 December 2009, and Streltsov and other "Novocherkassk military pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 8549/06 and 86 others, § 96, 29 July 2010), the Court finds no reason to consider that the compensation offered to Mr Ryabkin constitutes inadequate or otherwise unreasonable redress for the violations of his Convention rights.
  • EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 11093/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    In those cases, it considered that the most appropriate form of redress in respect of such violations was to ensure that the applicants were put as far as possible in the position they would have been in, had the requirements of the Convention not been disregarded (see Tarnopolskaya and Others v. Russia, nos. 11093/07 and 18 others, §§ 49-51, 7 July 2009 with further references).
  • EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03

    KAZAKEVICH AND OTHER "ARMY PENSIONERS" CASES v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Given that these two applications concern similar facts and complaints and raise almost identical issues under the Convention, the Court decides to consider them in a single decision (see Kazakevich and 9 other "Army Pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 14290/03, 19089/04, 27800/04, 42059/04, 43505/04, 43538/04, 3614/05, 30906/05, 39901/05 and 524/06, § 15, 14 January 2010).
  • EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 28727/11

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    This is particularly true in civil cases where the Contracting States dispose of a variety of means to ensure redress to an aggrieved party (see Kudeshkina (no. 2) v. Russia (dec.), no. 28727/11, § 77, 17 February 2014).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 30351/06

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 21506/08

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 38767/07

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 27440/03

    FINKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 30432/06

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 43282/02

    NAYDENKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 7182/03

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 69341/01

    YURIY ROMANOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 20887/03

    KOT v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 29612/09

    MARTYNETS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 18967/07

    DAVYDOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 27127/05

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 03.09.2026 - 16030/23

    JUOZAPAVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

    52166/08 and 8526/09, §§ 49-50, 28 June 2016, and Igranov and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 03.09.2026 - 64519/16

    DYMIŃSKI v. POLAND

    52166/08 and 8526/09, §§ 49-50, 28 June 2016, and Igranov and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 08.12.2022 - 68160/17

    ANTOVSKI AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

    52166/08 and 8526/09, §§ 49-50, 28 June 2016, and Igranov and Others v. Russia, nos.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht