Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JIRSÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 3 MRK
  No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  When assessing conditions of detention, account has to be taken of the cumulative effects of those conditions, as well as the specific allegations made by the applicant (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  When assessing conditions of detention, account has to be taken of the cumulative effects of those conditions, as well as the specific allegations made by the applicant (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  Furthermore, a scarce space in relative terms can be compensated for by the large size in absolute terms of the dormitories, as well as the freedom of movement allowed (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 107, ECHR 2001-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 28.01.1994 - 17549/90

  HURTADO c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  Regarding injuries, a six-day delay in treating a broken rib was found to be a violation of Article 3 by the Commission in Hurtado v. Switzerland ((dec.), no. 17549/90,§ 80, 8 July 1993).
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  Under Article 2 of the Convention a delay of two hours in treating a fractured skull, which eventually led to death, was found incompatible with the obligation to provide timely medical care (Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 130, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 22635/03

  SULEJMANOVIC c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  Such elements include, in particular, the possibility of using the toilet in private, ventilation, access to natural light and air, adequacy of heating arrangements, and compliance with basic sanitary requirements (see, for example, Moiseyev v. Russia, no. 62936/00, § 123, 9 October 2008, and Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no. 22635/03, § 42, 16 July 2009).

• EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

  VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  On the other hand, even in cases where the inmates appeared to have at their disposal sufficient personal space and a larger prison cell was at issue - measuring in the range of three to four square metres per inmate - the Court noted other aspects of physical conditions of detention as being relevant for the assessment of compliance with Article 3 and found a violation of that provision since the space factor was coupled with the established lack of ventilation and lighting (see, for example, Vlasov v. Russia, no. 78146/01, § 84, 12 June 2008; and Trepashkin v. Russia, cited above, § 94), lack of outdoor exercise (see Longin v. Croatia, no. 49268/10, §§ 60-61, 6 November 2012) and poor sanitary and hygiene conditions (see Jirsák v. the Czech Republic, no. 8968/08, §§ 64-73; Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 164-166).
• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 15048/09

  HEBAT ASLAN ET FIRAS ASLAN c. TURQUIE

  Aussi, déclarant se fonder sur des décisions rendues par la Cour (Holub c. République tchèque (déc.), no 24880/05, 14 décembre 2010, Matousek c. République tchèque (déc.), no 9965/08, 29 mars 2011, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional c. Portugal (déc.), no 49639/09, 3 avril 2012, et Jirsák c. République tchèque (déc.), no 8968/08, §§ 89-90, 5 avril 2012), il considère que le grief relatif à l'absence de communication de l'avis du procureur doit être déclaré irrecevable en application de l'article 35 § 3 b) de la Convention.
• EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 60439/12

  ZIROVNICKÝ c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

  En ce qui concerne la demande en dommages-intérêts du requérant relative à ses conditions de détention sur le fondement de la loi no 82/1998, le Gouvernement soutient que la pratique des tribunaux qui examinent de telles demandes au fond (paragraphe 73 ci-dessus) démontre que ce recours est effectif et que le requérant ne prouve pas le contraire (voir, mutatis mutandis, Jirsák c. République tchèque, no 8968/08, §§ 45 et 52, 5 avril 2012, et Bures c. République tchèque (déc.), no 5081/11, 9 octobre 2012).
• EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  BUTIUC AND DUMITROF v. ROMANIA

  However, they failed to provide any information in respect of cell temperature during wintertime (compare Praznik v. Slovenia, no. 6234/10, § 9, 28 June 2012; and Jirsák v. The Czech Republic, no. 8968/08, § 70, 5 April 2012, where the respective Governments were capable of providing information concerning the temperature in the cells in question).
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 16680/14

  PENARANDA SOTO v. MALTA

  Leaving a detained person without essential medical treatment as prescribed by medical experts over a substantial period of time and without satisfactory explanation amounts to inhuman and degrading treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Mikhaniv v. Ukraine, no. 75522/01, § 74, 6 November 2008 and Jirsák v. the Czech Republic, no. 8968/08, § 75, 5 April 2012).