Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BUTIUC AND DUMITROF v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Butiuc and Dumitrof v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BUTIUC ET DUMITROF c. ROUMANIE

  Art. 3 MRK
  [FRA]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  The Court reiterates that under Article 3 of the Convention the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of execution of the measure of detention do not subject the person to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  The Court reiterates that under Article 3 of the Convention the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of execution of the measure of detention do not subject the person to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  When assessing conditions of detention, their cumulative effects as well as the applicant's specific allegations must be considered (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II).

 
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  IACOV STANCIU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  Excerpts from the relevant provisions concerning the rights of detainees, namely Emergency Government Ordinance no. 56/2003 and Law no. 275/2006, are quoted in Iacov Stanciu v. Romania (no. 35972/05, §§ 113-16, 24 July 2012) and Petrea v. Romania (no. 4792/03, § 22, 29 April 2008).
• EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 53254/99

  KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  The Court has considered extreme lack of space as a central factor in its analysis of whether an applicant's detention conditions comply with Article 3 (see Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, § 39, 7 April 2005).
• EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 67253/01

  BABUSHKIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  The Court further notes that, in addition to overcrowding, other aspects of physical conditions of detention are relevant for its assessment of compliance with Article 3 (see Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, § 89, 13 September 2005; Babushkin v. Russia, no. 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007; and Iacov Stanciu, cited above, § 169).
• EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 4792/03

  PETREA v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  Excerpts from the relevant provisions concerning the rights of detainees, namely Emergency Government Ordinance no. 56/2003 and Law no. 275/2006, are quoted in Iacov Stanciu v. Romania (no. 35972/05, §§ 113-16, 24 July 2012) and Petrea v. Romania (no. 4792/03, § 22, 29 April 2008).
• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 35207/03

  OSTROVAR v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  The Court further notes that, in addition to overcrowding, other aspects of physical conditions of detention are relevant for its assessment of compliance with Article 3 (see Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, § 89, 13 September 2005; Babushkin v. Russia, no. 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007; and Iacov Stanciu, cited above, § 169).
• EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 17044/03

  CUCOLAS c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  The Court notes that, although the Government did not provide any information about the exact number of inmates in each cell the first applicant had been detained in before 5 February 2010, his allegations of overcrowding are corroborated by the description of facts established by the Court in similar cases where it has found the conditions of detention in Poarta Alba Prison in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Cucolas v. Romania, no. 17044/03, §§ 90 and 94, 26 October 2010, and Hacioglu v. Romania, no. 2573/03, §§ 53-56, 11 January 2011).
• EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 36479/03

  COLESNICOV c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  In a series of cases, the Court considered that a clear case of overcrowding was a sufficient element for concluding that Article 3 of the Convention had been violated (see Colesnicov v. Romania, no. 36479/03, §§ 78-82, 21 December 2010, and Budaca v. Romania, no. 57260/10, §§ 40-45, 17 July 2012).
• EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  JIRSÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 57260/10

  BUDACA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 2052/08

  KOKOSHKINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 2573/03

  HACIOGLU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 19730/10

  TOMA BARBU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.06.2012 - 6234/10

  PRAZNIK v. SLOVENIA