Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 46092/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56601) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KORMOS v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (victim) Violation of Art. 5-1 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Kormos v. Slovakia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 46092/06
- EGMR, 14.09.2016 - 46092/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 46092/06
In the Jecius v. Lithuania judgment (no. 34578/97, 31 July 2000, §§ 56-64, ECHR 2000-IX) the Court found that the sole fact that the case had been transmitted to the court did not constitute a "lawful" basis for detention within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, and that it could not extend or replace the valid detention order required by domestic law. - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 23788/06
BECOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 46092/06
The level of just satisfaction granted at national level must nevertheless not be manifestly inadequate in the particular circumstances of the case (see also Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 65-107, ECHR 2006-V; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-213, ECHR 2006-V; or Becová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 23788/06, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 46092/06
The Court reiterates that Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).