Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WCISLO AND CABAJ v. POLAND

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Right to a fair ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  WCISLO v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11, 79950/13
• EGMR, 06.08.2020 - 49725/11

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11

  The relevant principles relating to the application of Article 13 of the Convention to complaints about a violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time have been set out in a number of judgments (see, among other authorities, Kudla, cited above, § 157; Scordino (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89; Sürmeli v. Germany ([GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII, with further references; Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece, no. 50973/08, § 55, 21 December 2010; and Ümmühan Kaplan v. Turkey, no. 24240/07, § 72, 20 March 2012.
• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11

  The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be reimbursed under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII).
• EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 24240/07

  ÜMMÜHAN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11

  The relevant principles relating to the application of Article 13 of the Convention to complaints about a violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time have been set out in a number of judgments (see, among other authorities, Kudla, cited above, § 157; Scordino (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89; Sürmeli v. Germany ([GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII, with further references; Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece, no. 50973/08, § 55, 21 December 2010; and Ümmühan Kaplan v. Turkey, no. 24240/07, § 72, 20 March 2012.

 
• EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 12605/03

  LEON AND AGNIESZKA KANIA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11

  The Court has already examined the effectiveness of the combination of remedies for excessively lengthy administrative proceedings and found them found them effective (see, among other authorities, Bukowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 38665/97, 11 June 2002; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 43-49, 28 March 2006; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, § 54, ECHR 2005-VI; Leon and Agnieszka Kania v. Poland, no. 12605/03, §§ 89-90, 21 July 2009 and Derda v. Poland, no. 58154/08, § 58, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 38064/97

  TURCZANIK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11

  The Court has already examined the effectiveness of the combination of remedies for excessively lengthy administrative proceedings and found them found them effective (see, among other authorities, Bukowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 38665/97, 11 June 2002; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 43-49, 28 March 2006; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, § 54, ECHR 2005-VI; Leon and Agnieszka Kania v. Poland, no. 12605/03, §§ 89-90, 21 July 2009 and Derda v. Poland, no. 58154/08, § 58, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 52495/99

  KOSS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11

  The Court has already examined the effectiveness of the combination of remedies for excessively lengthy administrative proceedings and found them found them effective (see, among other authorities, Bukowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 38665/97, 11 June 2002; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 43-49, 28 March 2006; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, § 54, ECHR 2005-VI; Leon and Agnieszka Kania v. Poland, no. 12605/03, §§ 89-90, 21 July 2009 and Derda v. Poland, no. 58154/08, § 58, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 58154/08

  DERDA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 49725/11

  The Court has already examined the effectiveness of the combination of remedies for excessively lengthy administrative proceedings and found them found them effective (see, among other authorities, Bukowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 38665/97, 11 June 2002; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 43-49, 28 March 2006; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, § 54, ECHR 2005-VI; Leon and Agnieszka Kania v. Poland, no. 12605/03, §§ 89-90, 21 July 2009 and Derda v. Poland, no. 58154/08, § 58, 1 June 2010).

• EGMR, 25.02.2020 - 59805/14

  HERMANN v. POLAND

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wcis??o and Cabaj v. Poland, nos. 49725/11, and 79950/13, 8 November 2018).
• EGMR, 21.04.2020 - 23925/13

  NAPIERALA AND KUBICA v. POLAND

  49725/11 and 79950/13, 8 November 2018).
• EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 373/10

  SREDNICKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wcis??o and Cabaj v. Poland, nos. 49725/11 and 79950/13, 8 November 2018).