Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PUTINTSEVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04
• EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 33498/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  The Court considers that in principle there can be no such necessity where it is known that the fleeing person poses no threat to life or limb and is not suspected of having committed a violent offence, even if failure to use lethal force may result in the opportunity to arrest the fugitive being lost (see the Court's approach in McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-50 and §§ 192-214, Series A no. 324, and, more recently, in Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 64-66, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  The Court considers that in principle there can be no such necessity where it is known that the fleeing person poses no threat to life or limb and is not suspected of having committed a violent offence, even if failure to use lethal force may result in the opportunity to arrest the fugitive being lost (see the Court's approach in McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-50 and §§ 192-214, Series A no. 324, and, more recently, in Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 64-66, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  They cannot leave it to the initiative of the next of kin either to lodge a formal complaint or to take responsibility for the conduct of any investigative procedures (see Kelly and Others, cited above, § 94, and, mutatis mutandis, Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC] no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII, § 63).

 
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its capability of establishing the circumstances of the case or the person responsible is liable to fall foul of the required standard of effectiveness (see Leonidis v. Greece, no. 43326/05, § 68, 8 January 2009, and Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 139, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  The Court firstly considers it necessary to reiterate the subsidiary nature of its role and recognises that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  Where allegations are made under Articles 2 or 3 of the Convention, however, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 113, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  The Court is not concerned with reaching any findings as to guilt or innocence in that sense (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 284, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts), and McCann and Others, cited above, §§ 170-173).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  Such a legal framework is fundamentally deficient and falls well short of the level of protection "by law" of the right to life that is required by the Convention (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 100, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 43393/98

  MATKO v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  Although the Court is not bound by the findings of domestic courts, in normal circumstances it requires cogent elements to lead it to depart from the findings of fact reached by those courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, § 100, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43326/05

  LEONIDIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its capability of establishing the circumstances of the case or the person responsible is liable to fall foul of the required standard of effectiveness (see Leonidis v. Greece, no. 43326/05, § 68, 8 January 2009, and Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 139, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 1062/03

  GOLUBEVA v. RUSSIA