Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÇÖÇELLI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ÇÖÇELLI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  DENISOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 81415/12

  Lastly, the Court refers to the general principles in respect of lack of impartiality, which are summarised in Morice v. France ([GC], no. 29369/10, §§ 73-78, ECHR 2015) and Denisov v. Ukraine ([GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 60-65, 25 September 2018).
• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84

  Brandstetter ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 81415/12

  In that connection the Court has recognised that a lack of neutrality on the part of a court-appointed expert may in certain circumstances give rise to a breach of the principle of equality of arms inherent in the concept of a fair trial (see Bönisch v. Austria, 6 May 1985, §§ 30-35, Series A no. 92, and Brandstetter v. Austria, 28 August 1991, § 33, Series A no. 211).
• EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79

  Bönisch ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 81415/12

  In that connection the Court has recognised that a lack of neutrality on the part of a court-appointed expert may in certain circumstances give rise to a breach of the principle of equality of arms inherent in the concept of a fair trial (see Bönisch v. Austria, 6 May 1985, §§ 30-35, Series A no. 92, and Brandstetter v. Austria, 28 August 1991, § 33, Series A no. 211).

 
• EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 8562/79

  FELDBRUGGE v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 81415/12

  For example, the Court has already held that an opinion of a medical expert, as it falls outside the judges" probable area of expertise, is likely to have a dominant influence on the assessment of the facts and to be considered an essential piece of evidence (see Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands, 29 May 1986, § 44, Series A no. 99; Mantovanelli v. France, 18 March 1997, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II; and Augusto v. France, no. 71665/01, § 51, 11 January 2007).
• EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 36220/97

  OKYAY AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 81415/12

  It therefore follows that the outcome of the impugned proceedings related to the applicants" "civil rights" (see Taskin and Others v. Turkey, no. 46117/99, §§ 130-34, ECHR 2004-X; Okyay and Others v. Turkey, no. 36220/97, §§ 65-68, ECHR 2005-VII; and Bursa Barosu Baskanligi and Others, cited above, §§ 126-28 for similar conclusions in cases against Türkiye where the challenges to EIA reports by the applicants were considered by the Court to have related to "civil rights and obligations" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention).
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 46575/09

  BELLIZZI v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 81415/12

  The Court further reiterates that the objective test is functional in nature as it mostly concerns hierarchical or other links between the judge and other participants in the proceedings (see Bellizzi v. Malta, no. 46575/09, § 54, 21 June 2011).

• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 53600/20

  Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz u.a. ./. Schweiz - Staatliche Maßnahmen gegen …

  Cela vaut pour les particuliers (voir, par exemple, Balmer-Schafroth et autres c. Suisse, 26 août 1997, § 26, Recueil 1997-IV, et Çöçelli et autres c. Türkiye, no 81415/12, §§ 39-40, 11 octobre 2022) et pour les associations (voir, par exemple, Gorraiz Lizarraga et autres, précité, § 36, et Yusufeli Ilçesini Güzellestirme Yasatma Kültür Varliklarini Koruma Dernegi, décision précitée, § 40, avec d'autres références).
• EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 14684/18

  EFGAN ÇETIN AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE

  Having regard to the foregoing, the Court is satisfied that the applicants have adequately demonstrated that they were directly affected by the decisions of the Administrative Court and finds that they may claim to be victims in respect of their Article 6 § 1 complaint (see, for a similar conclusion, Çöçelli and Others v. Türkiye, no. 81415/12, § 40, 11 October 2022).