Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THOR v. AUSTRIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  THOR v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00

  D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  The Court has established in its case-law that in order for an issue to arise under Article 14 there must be a difference in the treatment of persons in relevantly similar situations (D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007).
• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  KEEGAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  Moreover, and this is not in dispute between the parties, the measure at issue had a basis in national law (namely Articles 177 and 177a of the Civil Code) and was aimed at protecting the best interests of the applicant's child, E.T., which is a legitimate aim within the meaning of paragraph 2 of Article 8 (see Keegan v. Ireland, judgment of 26 May 1994, § 44, Series A no. 290, and Görgülü, cited above, § 37).
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010, and Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 99, 3 May 2007).

 
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96

  BAUMANN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  However, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V, and Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

  BRUSCO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  However, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V, and Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 12.01.2006 - 18888/02

  IÇYER c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; see also Içyer v. Turkey (dec.) no. 18888/02, ECHR 2006-I).
• EGMR - 14163/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010, and Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 99, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR - 19993/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010, and Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 99, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01

  NOGOLICA c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  In particular, the Court has previously departed from this general rule in cases, for example, against Italy, Croatia and Slovakia concerning remedies against the excessive length of proceedings (see Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Brusco, cited above; and Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

  ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 67656/12

  57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; see also Içyer v. Turkey (dec.) no. 18888/02, ECHR 2006-I).
• EGMR - 10200/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02
• EGMR - 21819/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 13466/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02

  GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE
• EGMR, 16.10.2006 - 32817/02

  E. W. gegen Deutschland