Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEVAN PETROVIC v. SERBIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 5 - Right ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PETROVIC v. SERBIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (25)

• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 26088/06

  STANIMIROVIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  Even when, strictly speaking, no complaint has been made, an investigation must be started if there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment has been used (see, for example, Stanimirovic v. Serbia, no. 26088/06, § 39, 18 October 2011, and Almasi, cited above, § 61).

  He was then detained for the purposes of Article 5 § 3 until his conviction by the Zrenjanin High Court on 30 June 2015 (see paragraph 43 above; see also, for example, Stanimirovic v. Serbia, no. 26088/06, § 43, 18 October 2011).

• EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

  Urteil bestätigt Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  35553/12 and 2 others, § 74, 22 October 2018).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  Compliance with national law is not, however, sufficient: Article 5 § 1 requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see, among many other authorities, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 37, Series A no. 33; Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, §§ 72-73, ECHR 2000-III; and S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos.

 
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  As established in Neumeister v. Austria (judgment of 27 June 1968, § 4, Series A no. 8), the second limb of Article 5 § 3 does not give judicial authorities a choice between either bringing an accused to trial within a reasonable time or granting him or her provisional release pending trial.
• EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13611/88

  Klaus Croissant

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  It is necessarily subject to certain limitations where free legal aid is concerned and also where it is for the courts to decide whether the interests of justice require that the accused be defended by counsel appointed by them (see Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, § 29, Series A no. 237-B).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII) while in the absence of such explanation the Court may draw inferences which may be unfavourable for the Government (see, among other authorities, Bouyid, cited above, § 83).
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  The requisite access may be provided for in other stages of the available procedures and the investigating authorities do not have a duty to satisfy every request for a particular investigative measure in the course of an investigation (see, for example and among other authorities, Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 347, ECHR 2007-II, and Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 236, 30 March 2016, albeit both in the context of Article 2 of the Convention).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  Thus, Article 6 - especially paragraph 3 thereof - may be relevant before a case is sent for trial if and in so far as the fairness of the trial is liable to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, §§ 36-37, Series A no. 275; Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 50, ECHR 2008; Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703/11, § 76, ECHR 2015; and Beuze v. Belgium [GC], no. 71409/10, § 121, 9 November 2018).
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  It follows that the applicant's pre-trial detention, including the period prior to his initial conviction, lasted for approximately three years in all (see, mutatis mutandis, Yaroshovets and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 74820/10 and 4 others, §§ 115-16, 3 December 2015; also, compare and contrast, for example, Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 129, 130 and 134, 22 May 2012, where the applicant, unlike the applicant in the present case, had been released from his pre-trial detention and then re-arrested).
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  BOZANO v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 6097/16

  Detention will be "arbitrary" where, despite complying with the letter of national law, there has been an element of bad faith or deception on the part of the authorities (see, for example, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 59, Series A no. 111, and Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, §§ 77-79, 9 July 2009) or where the domestic authorities neglected to attempt to apply the relevant legislation correctly (see Benham, cited above, § 47; Liu v. Russia, no. 42086/05, § 82, 6 December 2007; and Marturana v. Italy, no. 63154/00, § 80, 4 March 2008).
• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 27561/02

  SOLMAZ c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

  LETELLIER c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 03.12.2015 - 74820/10

  YAROSHOVETS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 42086/05

  LIU v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 26808/08

  ÇATAL v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11

  AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 29896/14

  JEVTOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 21388/15

  ALMASI v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 75345/01

  YATSENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 19796/14

  KRSMANOVIC v. SERBIA

• EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 55788/20

  KRÁTKY v. SLOVAKIA

  6097/16 and 28999/19, § 178, 20 April 2021), the Court concludes that the constitutional proceedings leading to the decisions of 10 September 2020 and 18 March 2021 fell short of the requirement of speediness.
• EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 24989/17

  ÐURIC v. SERBIA

  That is, the applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see, for example, Stevan Petrovic v. Serbia, nos. 6097/16 and 28999/19, § 186, 20 April 2021).
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 32731/17

  KOSTOV c. BULGARIE

  Par ailleurs, la Cour relève que le montant de l'indemnité proposée par le Gouvernement - une somme de 16 400 euros - est pleinement satisfaisant au regard des montants alloués par elle dans des affaires similaires (voir, par exemple, Boris Kostadinov c. Bulgarie, no 61701/11, §§ 65-76, 21 janvier 2016, Stevan Petrovic c. Serbie, nos 6097/16 et 28999/19, §§ 181-187, 20 avril 2021, et Trocin c. République de Moldova, no 23847/19, §§ 65-70, 16 mars 2021).

 
• EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 56540/14

  SUSLOV AND BATIKYAN v. UKRAINE

  Even when, strictly speaking, no complaint has been made, an investigation must be started if there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment has been used (see, for example, Stevan Petrovic v. Serbia, nos. 6097/16 and 28999/19, § 108, 20 April 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 6682/12

  NOVAKOVIC v. SERBIA

  In Stevan Petrovic v. Serbia (nos. 6097/16 and 28999/19, §§ 153-57, 20 April 2021) the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR - 9842/23 (anhängig)

  DIMOVIC v. SERBIA

  6097/16 and 28999/19, §§ 153-54, 20 April 2021), was the procedure before the domestic courts in respect of the extension orders taken between 12 November 2019 and 6 May 2020 in conformity with Article 5 § 4 of the Convention? In particular, were the courts required to hold an oral hearing when extending his pre-trial detention during the above-mentioned period?.
• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 37967/18

  SHAHZAD v. HUNGARY (No. 2)

  In particular, such investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and - if appropriate - punishment of those responsible, to ensure their accountability for the ill-treatment in question (see Bouyid, cited above, §§ 117 and 119, and Stevan Petrovic v. Serbia, nos. 6097/16 and 28999/19, § 109, 20 April 2021).
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 6673/12

  KOVAC v. SERBIA

  In Stevan Petrovic v. Serbia (nos. 6097/16 and 28999/19, §§ 153-57, 20 April 2021) the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.