Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,49493) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DEMIREL AND ATES v. TURKEY (N°2)
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 10 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95
SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02
As established in the case-law, this is the essential factor (contrast Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-IV, and Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 50, 8 July 1999) in the assessment of the necessity of the measure. - EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93
ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02
The Court has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos. 28635/95, 30171/96 and 34535/97, §§ 80, 10 October 2000 and Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23556/94
CEYLAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02
The Court has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos. 28635/95, 30171/96 and 34535/97, §§ 80, 10 October 2000 and Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003).
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 24919/94
GERGER v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02
As established in the case-law, this is the essential factor (contrast Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-IV, and Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 50, 8 July 1999) in the assessment of the necessity of the measure. - EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 27528/95
KIZILYAPRAK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02
The Court has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos. 28635/95, 30171/96 and 34535/97, §§ 80, 10 October 2000 and Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 24762/94
SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 4)
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02
The Court has examined the judgment in question and it would appear that no sufficient reasoning was given in the judgment to justify the interference with the applicants' right to freedom of expression (see, mutatis mutandis, Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) [GC], no. 24762/94, § 58, 8 July 1999). - EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 28635/95
IBRAHIM AKSOY c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 31080/02
The Court has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI; Ä°brahim Aksoy v. Turkey, nos. 28635/95, 30171/96 and 34535/97, §§ 80, 10 October 2000 and Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003).
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 39457/03
SAYGILI AND FALAKAOGLU v. TURKEY
A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Özgür Gündem v. Turkey (no. 23144/93, § 32, ECHR 2000-III), and Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 31080/02, § 12, 29 November 2007). - EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 38991/02
SAYGILI AND FALAKAOGLU v. TURKEY (No. 2)
A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Özgür Gündem v. Turkey (no. 23144/93, § 32, ECHR 2000-III) and Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 31080/02, § 12, 29 November 2007).