Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MATYJEK c. POLOGNE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Exception préliminaire jointe au fond (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Recevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MATYJEK v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Admissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03
• EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 38184/03
• EGMR, 25.09.2014 - 38184/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 55480/00

  SIDABRAS ET DZIAUTAS c. LITUANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  In Lithuania persons who have been given the statutory status of "former KGB officers" have been precluded from employment in the public sector and from some private-sector jobs until 2009 (see Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania, nos. 70665/01 and 74345/01, § 36, 7 April 2005, and Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, ECHR 2004-VIII).

  55480/00 and 59330/00, 1 July 2003).

• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 59330/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  In Lithuania persons who have been given the statutory status of "former KGB officers" have been precluded from employment in the public sector and from some private-sector jobs until 2009 (see Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania, nos. 70665/01 and 74345/01, § 36, 7 April 2005, and Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, ECHR 2004-VIII).

  55480/00 and 59330/00, 1 July 2003).

• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  The applicant referred finally to the Court's case law which requires Article 35 of the Convention to be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see Guzzardi v. Italy, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, § 72).

 
• EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

  Öztürk ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  A latitude extending thus far might lead to results incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention (see Öztürk v. Germany, judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, pp. 17-18, §§ 48-50; mutatis mutandis, Engel and Others, cited above, p. 33, § 80; and Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 68).
• EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

  CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  The Court reiterates the autonomous notion of "criminal charge" under Article 6. The starting-point, for the assessment of the applicability of the criminal aspect of Article 6 of the Convention to the present proceedings, is the criteria outlined in Engel and Others (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, pp. 34-35, §§ 82-83, and Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, p. 35, § 68).
• EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 12547/86

  BENDENOUN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  This does not exclude that a cumulative approach may be adopted where separate analysis of each criterion does not make it possible to reach a clear conclusion as to the existence of a criminal charge (see Bendenoun v. France, judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 284, p. 20, § 47; Benham v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 10 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, p. 756, § 56; Garyfallou AEBE v. Greece, cited above, p. 1830, § 33; and Lauko v. Slovakia, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2504-05, § 57).
• EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 28541/95

  PELLEGRIN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  In the Government's opinion, the Court's jurisprudence excluding the applicability of Article 6 of the Convention to disputes between the State and its officials should preclude this Article from being applicable to the instant case (they relied on the following cases: Massa v. Italy, judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, § 26, and Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 65, ECHR 1999-VIII).
• EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 11034/84

  WEBER c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  However, the indication so afforded by the national law has only a formal and relative value; this factor serves only as a starting-point (see Weber v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, § 31, and Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, § 91, ECHR 2003-X).
• EGMR, 24.08.1993 - 14399/88

  MASSA v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03

  In the Government's opinion, the Court's jurisprudence excluding the applicability of Article 6 of the Convention to disputes between the State and its officials should preclude this Article from being applicable to the instant case (they relied on the following cases: Massa v. Italy, judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, § 26, and Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 65, ECHR 1999-VIII).