Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 04.12.1995 - 24565/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,28665) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 21987/93
AKSOY c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.12.1995 - 24565/94
In the case of Aksoy v. Turkey (No. 21987/93, Dec. 19.10.94, unpublished), which also concerned allegations of ill-treatment during detention, the Commission noted that prior to the applicant's release from detention, he had a meeting with the public prosecutor, and the Commission found no reason to doubt that during their conversation there had been elements which should have made the public prosecutor initiate an investigation or, at the very least, try to obtain further information from the applicant about his state of health or about the treatment to which he had been subjected. - EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.12.1995 - 24565/94
It is furthermore established that the burden of proving the existence of available and sufficient domestic remedies lies upon the State invoking the rule (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 18, para. 36, and Nos. 14116/88 and 14117/88, Sargin and Yagci v. Turkey, Dec. 11.05.89, D.R. 61 p. 250, 262). - EKMR, 11.05.1989 - 14116/88
SARGIN ; YAGCI contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.12.1995 - 24565/94
It is furthermore established that the burden of proving the existence of available and sufficient domestic remedies lies upon the State invoking the rule (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 18, para. 36, and Nos. 14116/88 and 14117/88, Sargin and Yagci v. Turkey, Dec. 11.05.89, D.R. 61 p. 250, 262).