Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 12175/86   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1988,16733
EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 12175/86 (https://dejure.org/1988,16733)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 12.05.1988 - 12175/86 (https://dejure.org/1988,16733)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Mai 1988 - 12175/86 (https://dejure.org/1988,16733)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1988,16733) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

    LEANDER c. SUÈDE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 12175/86
    In the light of the Court's judgment in the Leander Case (Eur. Court H.R., Leander judgment of 22 March 1987, Series A no. 116) and without prejudice to the merits of the applicants' claims under this head, the Government do not contest the admissibility of the applicants' complaint under Article 8 of the Convention or under Article 13 of the Convention with respect to their claims under Article 8.

    1 (Art. 8-1) of the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Leander judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, p. 22, para. 48).

  • EKMR, 15.05.1980 - 8317/78

    McFEELEY et al. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 12175/86
    1 does not guarantee a right to associate in this sense, the Article being concerned with the right to form or be affiliated with a particular group or organisation (see No. 8317/78, McFeeley and others v. the United Kingdom, Dec. of 18.5.80, D.R. 20 p. 98, para. 114).
  • EKMR, 19.03.1981 - 8118/77

    OMKARANANDA et DIVINE LIGHT ZENTRUM c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 12175/86
    In these circumstances there exists no factual basis for the applicants' assertion that their freedom to associate with others has been interfered with (cf. No. 7729/76, Agee v. the United Kingdom, Dec. 17.12.76, D.R. 7 p. 164, at p. 174; No. 8118/77, Omkarananda and another v. Switzerland, Dec. 19.3.81, D.R. 25 p. 105 at p. 118).
  • EKMR, 14.10.1985 - 10628/83

    M.S. and P.S. v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 12175/86
    The applicants have at all times been free to express opinions whether of a political nature or otherwise, and no evidence has been adduced to suggest that the exercise of such freedom has been made subject to any "formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties" or to any other interference by a public authority: no evidence has been adduced to show that any of the alleged measures complained of were aimed at punishing the applicants for exercising their right to express political or other opinions (cf. No. 10628/83, Dec. 14.10.85 to be published in D.R. 44).
  • EKMR, 17.12.1976 - 7729/76

    AGEE v.the UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 12175/86
    In these circumstances there exists no factual basis for the applicants' assertion that their freedom to associate with others has been interfered with (cf. No. 7729/76, Agee v. the United Kingdom, Dec. 17.12.76, D.R. 7 p. 164, at p. 174; No. 8118/77, Omkarananda and another v. Switzerland, Dec. 19.3.81, D.R. 25 p. 105 at p. 118).
  • EGMR, 25.06.1997 - 20605/92

    HALFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Conformément à sa jurisprudence, la Commission a demandé à la requérante d'établir l'existence d'une "probabilité raisonnable" que les communications téléphoniques passées à son domicile ont fait l'objet d'une écoute (voir, par exemple, le rapport de la Commission sur la requête no 12175/86, Hewitt et Harman c. Royaume-Uni, 9 mai 1989, Décisions et rapports 67, pp. 114-115, paras. 29-32).
  • EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 50963/99

    AL-NASHIF v. BULGARIA

    No appeal was available to the applicant in Rotaru v. Romania ([GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V) - a case that also concerned the storage and use of secret information - and the Court found a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (see also Hewitt and Harman v. the United Kingdom, no. 12175/86, Commission report of 9 May1989).
  • EKMR, 02.12.1992 - 20591/92

    FIRSOFF v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    It is sufficient, in the area of secret measures, that the existence of practices permitting secret surveillance be established and that there is a reasonable likelihood that the security service has compiled and retained information concerning private life (see Application No. 12015/86, Dec. 6.7.88, to be published in D.R. and No. 12175/86 Comm. Report 9.5.89).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht