Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JOZEF OLEKSY v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (18)Zitiert selbst (1)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EKMR, 13.03.1980 - 8083/77

  X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 1379/06

  The Court reiterates that a person may not claim to be a victim of a violation of his right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Convention which, according to him, took place in the course of proceedings in which he was acquitted or which were discontinued (see X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8083/77, Commission decision of 13 March 1980, DR 19, p. 223; EÄŸinlioÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 31312/96, Commission decision of 21 October 1998, unreported; and Osmanov and Husseinov v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 21181/19

  TULEYA v. POLAND

  Under the well-established case-law (see Khlyustov v. Russia, no. 28975/05, § 103, 11 July 2013; see also I.I. v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44082/98, 25 March 2004, and Józef Oleksy v. Poland, (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009):.
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 2257/12

  ZADUMOV v. RUSSIA

  In support of their argument they referred to cases where the Court had concluded that under the criminal limb of Article 6 of the Convention, full acquittal, discontinuation of the proceedings, trial de novo or reopening of the proceedings had been considered as appropriate redress for a person having victim status under the Convention (see Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210 in fine, ECHR 2005-IV; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 264, 13 July 2006; Olesky v. Poland (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009; and Carboni v. Italy (dec.), no 51554/99, 12 February 2004).
• EGMR, 05.02.2026 - 46238/20

  MORAWIEC v. POLAND

  Rn. 65 Concerning fairness of proceedings and impartiality and independence of a domestic court, an acquitted defendant or a person against whom criminal proceedings were discontinued cannot claim to be a victim of violations of the Convention which, according to him, took place in the course of the proceedings against him (see, among other authorities, Komyakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 7100/02, 8 January 2009; Yaşar Kaplan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56566/00, 24 September 2004; Osmanov and Husseinov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 54178/00, 4 September 2003; and Oleksy v. Poland (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009).

• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07

  [ENG]

  According to the Court's and the former Commission's settled case-law, a person may not claim to be a victim of a breach of his or her right to a fair trial that allegedly took place in the course of proceedings in which he or she was acquitted or which were discontinued (see, among other authorities, X v. Austria, no. 5575/72, Commission decision of 8 July 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 1, p. 44; X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8083/77, Commission decision of 13 March 1980, DR 19, p. 223; EÄŸinlioÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 31312/96, Commission decision of 21 October 1998, unreported; Correia de Matos v. Portugal (dec.), no. 48188/99, 15 November 2001, ECHR 2001-XII; Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 54178/00, 4 September 2003; I.I. v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44082/98, 25 March 2004; Oleksy v. Poland (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009; G.L. v. Poland (dec.), no. 36714/09, 16 November 2010).
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 6250/10

  PAKSÜT v. TURKEY

  Dans le contexte de la présente affaire en examen, la Cour rappelle aussi qu'il est de jurisprudence constante que, à la suite d'un acquittement ou de l'annulation d'une condamnation, l'intéressé ne peut pas être considéré comme « victime'd'une violation des droits garantis par l'article 6 de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Sharomov c. Russie, no 8927/02, § 36, 15 janvier 2009, Komyakov c. Russie (déc.), no 7100/02, 8 janvier 2009, et Oleksy c. Pologne (déc.), no 1379/06, 16 juin 2009).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 42733/07

  GIUTTARI c. ITALIE

  La Cour rappelle qu'il est de jurisprudence constante qu'à la suite d'un acquittement ou de l'annulation d'une condamnation, le requérant ne peut pas être considéré comme « victime'des droits garantis par l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Ustün c. Turquie, no 37685/02, § 24, 10 mai 2007 ; Komyakov c. Russie (déc.), no 7100/02, 8 janvier 2009 ; Sharomov c. Russie, no 8927/02, § 36, 15 janvier 2009 ; et Oleksy c. Pologne (déc.), no 1379/06, 16 juin 2009).
• EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 20587/13

  TRACZ-SMOCZY?ƒSKA v. POLAND

  The Court has held within the context of lustration proceedings in Poland that "any defects which may have existed at the time of the applicant's trial must be considered to have been rectified by the discontinuation of the lustration proceedings" (see Józef Oleksy v. Poland (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009).
• EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 21979/08

  ODEROVS v. LATVIA

  The Court considers that a person may not claim under Article 6 of the Convention to be the victim of a violation of his right to a fair trial which, according to him, was committed in the course of proceedings in which he was acquitted or which were discontinued (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 78, 10 September 2010, and Oleksy v. Poland (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009 and the case-law cited therein).
• VG Gelsenkirchen, 15.09.2011 - 7a K 4913/10

  Abschiebungsschutz; Simbabwe; Versorgung von Kindern

  Rn. 4 Im anschließenden, vor dem Verwaltungsgericht Arnsberg geführten Klageverfahren 5 K 1379/06.A gab die Klägerin in der mündlichen Verhandlung Folgendes an: Sie habe bisher nicht die Wahrheit gesagt.
• EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 16147/08

  BOUGLAME c. BELGIQUE

  A cet égard, la Cour rappelle qu'il est de jurisprudence constante qu'à la suite d'un acquittement ou de l'annulation d'une condamnation, le requérant ne peut pas être considéré comme « victime'des droits garantis par l'article 6 de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Ustün c. Turquie, no 37685/02, § 24, 10 mai 2007 ; Sharomov c. Russie, no 8927/02, § 36, 15 janvier 2009 ; Komyakov c. Russie (déc.), no 7100/02, 8 janvier 2009 et Oleksy c. Pologne (déc.), no 1379/06, 16 juin 2009).
• EGMR, 26.02.2019 - 45494/10

  TOKAR v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 15729/15

  FLOR LEMUS v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 03.12.2013 - 6840/11

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 19.01.2012 - 43838/07

  O. v. IRELAND
• EGMR, 02.09.2021 - 72475/10

  TKHELIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 24461/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 25798/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 37868/06

  T.H. v. IRELAND