Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 11.12.2019

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,652
EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05 (https://dejure.org/2018,652)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.01.2018 - 15185/05 (https://dejure.org/2018,652)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. Januar 2018 - 15185/05 (https://dejure.org/2018,652)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,652) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IZZET ÇELIK v. TURKEY

    No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (79)Zitiert selbst (15)

  • EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4860/09

    TURGUT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    A description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Salduz v. Turkey ([GC] no. 36391/02, §§ 27-31, ECHR 2008), and Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26 26 March 2013).

    They maintained that the applicant had not exhausted domestic remedies, as he had not made any application to that Compensation Commission: this ground had also been recognised by the Court in its decision in the case of Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26, 26 March 2013).

  • EGMR, 07.06.2017 - 50541/08

    IBRAHIM ET AUTRES CONTRE LE ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    On 7 October 2016 the Vice-President of the Second Section invited the Government to submit further observations, if they so wished, following the judgment in Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, ECHR 2016).

    The Court does not consider it necessary to examine whether the systematic nature of the restriction on the applicant's right of access to a lawyer was, in itself, sufficient to find a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, as, in any event, the Government have not offered any compelling reasons for the restriction or demonstrated that the absence of legal assistance at the initial stage of the investigation did not irretrievably prejudice the applicant's defence rights (Salduz, cited above, § 58; and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, § 274.) In that respect, the Court notes that in convicting him, the first-instance court relied on the applicant's statements to the police.

  • EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 24240/07

    ÜMMÜHAN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    The Court observes that, as pointed out by the Government, a new domestic remedy has been established in Turkey following the application of the pilot-judgment procedure in the case of Ümmühan Kaplan v. Turkey (no. 24240/07, 20 March 2012).
  • EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 72174/10

    YIGITDOGAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    It therefore concludes that the complaint of the excessive length of the criminal proceedings must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Rifat Demir v. Turkey, no. 24267/07, § 35, 4 June 2013, and Yiğitdoğan v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 72174/10, § 59, 3 June 2014).
  • EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 70084/01

    KABASAKAL AND ATAR v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    Therefore, the Court finds that, in the particular circumstances of the case, the replacement of the military judge before the end of the proceedings disposed of the applicant's reasonably held concern about the trial court's independence and impartiality (see Kabasakal and Atar v. Turkey, nos. 70084/01 and 70085/01, § 34, 19 September 2006).
  • EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 24267/07

    RIFAT DEMIR c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    It therefore concludes that the complaint of the excessive length of the criminal proceedings must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Rifat Demir v. Turkey, no. 24267/07, § 35, 4 June 2013, and Yiğitdoğan v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 72174/10, § 59, 3 June 2014).
  • EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02

    GEÇGEL AND ÇELIK v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009).
  • EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 35292/05

    SAMAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    Taking into account the awards made in comparable cases (see Salduz, cited above, § 79; Gürova v. Turkey, no. 22088/03, § 21, 6 October 2009; Bolukoç and Others v. Turkey, no. 35392/04, § 47, 10 November 2009; and Şaman v. Turkey, no. 35292/05, § 45, 5 April 2011), the Court finds it reasonable to award EUR 1, 000 under this head.
  • EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 22088/03

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    Taking into account the awards made in comparable cases (see Salduz, cited above, § 79; Gürova v. Turkey, no. 22088/03, § 21, 6 October 2009; Bolukoç and Others v. Turkey, no. 35392/04, § 47, 10 November 2009; and Şaman v. Turkey, no. 35292/05, § 45, 5 April 2011), the Court finds it reasonable to award EUR 1, 000 under this head.
  • EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 35070/97

    TEZCAN UZUNHASANOGLU v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05
    In the light of its findings under Article 6 § 1 in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention, the Court considers that no separate examination of the remaining complaints under Article 6 is necessary (see Tezcan Uzunhasanoğlu v. Turkey, no. 35070/97, § 23, 20 April 2004, and Geçgel and Çelik v. Turkey, nos.
  • EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 38907/09

    KOÇ v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 56395/08

    ÖZBENT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 30.08.2005 - 68953/01

    CEYLAN v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 65897/01

    AKGÜL v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 45358/99

    OKUL contre la TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35935/10

    KORKMAZ v. TURKEY

    The Court has already examined the same legal problem and found violations of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention in cases against Turkey both before and after the above-mentioned Ibrahim and Others judgment (for the Court's approach prior to the Ibrahim and Others judgment, see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008; no. 20564/10, 12 January 2016; Galip Doğru v. Turkey, no. 36001/06, 28 April 2015; Eraslan and Others v. Turkey, no. 59653/00, 6 October 2009; Halil Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22922/03, 22 September 2009; Ditaban v. Turkey, no. 69006/01, 14 April 2009; and İbrahim Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 16500/04, 17 February 2009; and for the Court's approach following the Ibrahim and Others judgment, see Mehmet Duman v. Turkey, no. 38740/09, 23 October 2018; Ömer Güner v. Turkey, no. 28338/07, 4 September 2018; Canşad and Others v. Turkey, no. 7851/05, 13 March 2018; Girişen v. Turkey, no. 53567/07, 13 March 2018; İzzet Çelik v. Turkey, no. 15185/05, 23 January 2018; and Bayram Koç v. Turkey, no. 38907/09, 5 September 2017).

    In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession and the awards made in comparable cases (see Salduz, cited above, § 79; İzzet Çelik v. Turkey, no. 15185/05, § 52, 23 January 2018), the Court finds it reasonable to award EUR 1, 000 under this head.

  • EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 73408/10

    GEDIK AND OKTEM v. TURKEY

    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Turkey, its practice concerning complaints of systemic denial of legal assistance and the use of evidence obtained in the absence of a lawyer to convict applicants (Mehmet Duman v. Turkey, no. 38740/09, 23 October 2018; Ömer Güner v. Turkey, no. 28338/07, 4 September 2018; Girişen v. Turkey, no. 53567/07, 13 March 2018; Canşad and Others v. Turkey, no. 7851/05, 13 March 2018; İzzet Çelik v. Turkey, no. 15185/05, 23 January 2018; and Bayram Koç v. Turkey, no. 38907/09, 5 September 2017).

    Having regard to all the evidence in its possession, and in so far as it has jurisdiction to examine the allegations, the Court has not found any appearance of a breach of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols (see İzzet Çelik v. Turkey, no. 15185/05, § 33, 23 January 2018, and Kabasakal and Atar v. Turkey, nos.

  • EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 44728/09

    BAZ v. TURKEY

    The Court has established in a number of cases, including cases brought against Turkey, its practice concerning complaints of systemic denial of legal assistance and the use of evidence obtained in the absence of a lawyer to convict applicants (see, among other authorities, Mehmet Duman v. Turkey, no. 38740/09, 23 October 2018; Ömer Güner v. Turkey, no. 28338/07, 4 September 2018; Girişen v. Turkey, no. 53567/07, 13 March 2018; Canşad and Others v. Turkey, no. 7851/05, 13 March 2018; İzzet Çelik v. Turkey, no. 15185/05, 23 January 2018; and Bayram Koç v. Turkey, no. 38907/09, 5 September 2017).

    Having regard to all the evidence in its possession, and in so far as it has jurisdiction to examine the allegations, the Court has not found any appearance of a breach of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols (see İzzet Çelik v. Turkey, no. 15185/05, § 33, 23 January 2018, and Kabasakal and Atar v. Turkey, nos.

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 11.12.2019 - 53567/07, 37315/10, 47628/11, 30811/11, 15185/05, 21163/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,43959
EGMR, 11.12.2019 - 53567/07, 37315/10, 47628/11, 30811/11, 15185/05, 21163/08 (https://dejure.org/2019,43959)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11.12.2019 - 53567/07, 37315/10, 47628/11, 30811/11, 15185/05, 21163/08 (https://dejure.org/2019,43959)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11. Dezember 2019 - 53567/07, 37315/10, 47628/11, 30811/11, 15185/05, 21163/08 (https://dejure.org/2019,43959)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,43959) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GIRISEN CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 5 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GIRISEN AGAINST TURKEY AND 5 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 17.09.2024 - 10495/21

    BORISOVAS v. LITHUANIA

    The Court has previously departed from this rule notably in cases concerning remedies in respect of the length of detention (see Girişen v. Turkey, no. 53567/07, § 35, 13 March 2018 with further references).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht