Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 23204/07, 9870/07, 17012/09, 1871/08, 65391/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.11.2014 - 23204/07, 9870/07, 17012/09, 1871/08, 65391/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,55867)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. November 2014 - 23204/07, 9870/07, 17012/09, 1871/08, 65391/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,55867)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,55867) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GHAVTADZE AND 4 OTHER CASES AGAINST GEORGIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GHAVTADZE ET 4 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA GÉORGIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 23204/07
- EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 23204/07, 9870/07, 17012/09, 1871/08, 65391/09
Wird zitiert von ... (5)
- EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 7975/06
KLAUS ET IOURI KILADZE c. GEORGIE
Vu sa jurisprudence constante en la matière (voir, entre autres, Ghavtadze c. Géorgie, no 23204/07, §§ 118 et 120, 3 mars 2009), et dans la mesure où les demandes précitées sont valablement étayées et en rapport avec la violation constatée, statuant en équité, la Cour alloue aux requérants 1 950 EUR et 1 050 EUR au titre de leur représentation devant la Cour par Mme S. Japaridzé et M. Ph. Leach respectivement ainsi que 537 EUR pour les autres frais. - EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 55104/13
CATALIN EUGEN MICU c. ROUMANIE
La Cour considère d'abord que les exigences qui pèsent sur l'État concernant l'état de santé d'un détenu peuvent être différentes s'il s'agit d'une contamination avec une maladie transmissible (voir, par exemple, Fülöp c. Roumanie, no 18999/04, § 34, 24 juillet 2012 et Ghavtadze c. Géorgie, no 23204/07, § 86, 3 mars 2009 dans lesquelles les requérants alléguaient avoir contracté la tuberculose en prison) ou d'une maladie non-transmissible (voir, l'affaire Iamandi c. Roumanie, no 25867/03, § 65, 1er juin 2010 dans laquelle le requérant souffrait de diabète). - EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 3036/04
EUGEN GABRIEL RADU c. ROUMANIE
Partant, il convient de constater que la description des conditions en cause par le Gouvernement comme conformes aux exigences de l'article 3 n'est pas étayée par des éléments de preuve et est démentie par les rapports susmentionnés (voir, mutatis mutandis, Todor Todorov c. Bulgarie, no 50765/99, 5 avril 2007 et Ghavtadze c. Georgie, no 23204/07, § 93, 3 mars 2009). - EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 24378/04
CIOLAN c. ROUMANIE
Un résumé du guide pour le contrôle des tuberculoses en prison, réalisé par l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (« OMS ") et le Comité international de la Croix-Rouge (« CICR ") figure dans l'affaire Ghavtadze c. Georgie (no 23204/07, § 57, 3 mars 2009). - EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 7993/05
MINCULESCU c. ROUMANIE
Cela d'autant plus que les autorités pénitentiaires ne peuvent pas ignorer l'état infectieux de leurs détenus et, ce faisant, en exposer d'autres au risque réel de contracter des maladies graves (Ghavtadze c. Georgie (no 23204/07, § 105, 3 mars 2009).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55151) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IRAKLI MINDADZE v. GEORGIA
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (6) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00
KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09
The authorities must also ensure that a comprehensive record is kept concerning the detainee's state of health and his treatment while in detention (see, for example, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)); that the diagnoses and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov, cited above, § 115, and Melnik, cited above, §§ 104-106); and that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a therapeutic strategy aimed, to the extent possible, at curing the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109 and 114; Isayev v. Ukraine, no. 28827/02, § 58, 28 May 2009; and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09
Article 35 § 1 further requires that any procedural means that might prevent a breach of the Convention should have been used (see Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200). - EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09
The authorities must also ensure that a comprehensive record is kept concerning the detainee's state of health and his treatment while in detention (see, for example, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)); that the diagnoses and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov, cited above, § 115, and Melnik, cited above, §§ 104-106); and that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a therapeutic strategy aimed, to the extent possible, at curing the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109 and 114; Isayev v. Ukraine, no. 28827/02, § 58, 28 May 2009; and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006).
- EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01
MELNIK v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09
The relevant authorities were thereby sufficiently informed of the applicant's situation and had an opportunity to offer redress (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 70, 28 March 2006; Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 74, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); and Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. - EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 28300/06
SLAWOMIR MUSIAL v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09
The relevant authorities were thereby sufficiently informed of the applicant's situation and had an opportunity to offer redress (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 70, 28 March 2006; Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 74, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); and Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. - EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 9852/03
HUMMATOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09
9852/03 and 13413/04, § 92, 29 November 2007). - EGMR, 07.11.2006 - 30649/05
HOLOMIOV v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09
The authorities must also show that the necessary conditions were created for the prescribed treatment to be actually followed through (see Hummatov, cited above, § 116, and Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 117, 7 November 2006).
- EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 13185/07
ROSTOMASHVILI v. GEORGIA
The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); Goginashvili (cited above, §§ 69-70); Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012); and Jeladze v. Georgia (no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012). - EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 37747/08
KITIASHVILI v. GEORGIA
The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons have been summarised by the Court in the case of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein; see also Goginashvili, cited above, §§ 69-70; Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012; and Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia, no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012). - EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18720/08
BADUASHVILI v. GEORGIA
The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); Goginashvili v. Georgia (cited above, §§ 69-70); Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012); and Jeladze v. Georgia (no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012).
- EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 26657/07
MIRZASHVILI v. GEORGIA
The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); Goginashvili (cited above, §§ 69-70); Jeladze (cited above, §§ 41-42); and Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012). - EGMR, 20.12.2018 - 51772/08
KIKALISHVILI v. GEORGIA
The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons have been summarised by the Court in the case of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein; see also Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729/08, §§ 69-70, 4 October 2011; Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012; and Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia, no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012). - EGMR, 21.12.2017 - 55506/08
MESKHIDZE v. GEORGIA
The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); see also Goginashvili (cited above, §§ 69-70); Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012, and Jeladze v. Georgia (no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012).