Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• lto.de (Kurzinformation)

  Beschwerde beim EGMR unzulässig: Bäckerei musste keinen "Gay Cake" backen

• juraforum.de (Kurzinformation)

  Klage wegen verweigerter Torte mit Schwulen-Slogan gescheitert

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 18860/19

  Given the heightened sensitivity of the balancing exercise in the particular national context, the domestic courts were better placed than this Court to strike the balance between the competing Convention rights of the applicant, on the one hand, and the McArthurs, on the other (see, among many examples, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 48, Series A no. 24).
• EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 24645/94

  BUSCARINI ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 18860/19

  Furthermore, according to the Court's case-law, obliging a person to express a belief he or she does not hold amounts to a restriction of rights under Article 9 of the Convention (they referred, for example, to Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

  AZINAS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 18860/19

  It would be contrary to the subsidiary character of the Convention machinery if an applicant, ignoring a possible Convention argument, could rely on some other ground before the national authorities for challenging an impugned measure, but then lodge an application before the Court on the basis of the Convention argument (see also Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III, and Peacock, cited above, § 33).

 
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10

  REMUSZKO v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 18860/19

  Having regard to the Convention case-law, the Christian Institute argued that there were significant limits to the horizontal application of positive obligations (they referred, for example, to Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, ECHR 2003-VI, and Remuszko v. Poland, no. 1562/10, 16 July 2013).
• EGMR, 23.05.2017 - 62976/12

  NAK NAFTOGAZ UKRAINY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 18860/19

  Moreover, it was clear from Nak Naftogaz Ukrainy v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 62976/12, 23 May 2017) that he was required to raise those Convention rights pre-emptively; that is, to argue that if the courts allowed the defendants' appeal, his Convention rights would be breached.
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 52335/12

  PEACOCK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 18860/19

  The Government, relying on Peacock v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 52335/12, 5 January 2016), argued that it was not sufficient for the applicant to have raised his Convention complaints "in substance"; his Convention rights had to be positively asserted before the domestic courts.