Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Remuszko v. Poland
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (24)
- EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89
CASADO COCA v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
The Court has held on a number of occasions that this provision is applicable to advertising and commercial speech (see Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, § 35-36, Series A no. 285-A; and markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 26, Series A no. 165).It is especially relevant for the assessment of the present case that the States have a broad margin of appreciation in the regulation of speech in commercial matters or advertising (see markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, cited above, § 33, Series A no. 165, and Casado Coca v. Spain, cited above, § 50, Series A no. 285-A).
- EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
The Court has held on a number of occasions that this provision is applicable to advertising and commercial speech (see Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, § 35-36, Series A no. 285-A; and markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 26, Series A no. 165).It is especially relevant for the assessment of the present case that the States have a broad margin of appreciation in the regulation of speech in commercial matters or advertising (see markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, cited above, § 33, Series A no. 165, and Casado Coca v. Spain, cited above, § 50, Series A no. 285-A).
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 44306/98
APPLEBY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
The court referred to the Court's judgment in the case of Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, ECHR 2003-VII. It shared the Court's view that the principles governing the exercise of the freedom of expression were also applicable to commercial speech.Genuine, effective exercise of the freedom of expression does not depend merely on the State's duty not to interfere, but may require positive measures of protection, even in the sphere of relations between individuals see Fuentes Bobo v. Spain, no. 39293/98, § 38, 29 February 2000; and Wojtas-Kaleta v. Poland, no. 20436/02, § 43, 16 July 2009, concerning the obligation on the State to protect freedom of expression in the employment context; or Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, ECHR 2003-VI, where the Court examined the scope of the State's positive obligations in the regulation of the effective exercise of the freedom of expression in horizontal relations between private parties).
- EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79
Barthold ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
As to whether the domestic courts correctly applied those provisions, the Court reiterates that the application and interpretation of the domestic law fall primarily within the competency of the domestic authorities, which are, in the nature of things, particularly well placed to settle the issues arising in this connection (compare, inter alia, Barthold v. Germany, 25 March 1985, § 48, Series A no. 90). - EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 48321/99
SLIVENKO v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
The Court reiterates that it is in the first place for the national authorities, and in particular the courts of first instance and appeal, to construe and apply the domestic law (see, for example, Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00, § 61, ECHR 2003-V; Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 105, ECHR 2003-X; and Wloch v. Poland, no. 27785/95, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08
Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
The Court has examined a number of cases concerning restrictions on advertisement in television (see VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, ECHR 2001-VI, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, 22 April 2013). - EGMR, 28.06.2001 - 24699/94
VgT VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
The Court has examined a number of cases concerning restrictions on advertisement in television (see VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, ECHR 2001-VI, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, 22 April 2013). - EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02
Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
The boundaries between the State's positive and negative obligations under the Convention do not lend themselves to precise definition (see Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 82, ECHR 2009). - EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 23144/93
OZGUR GUNDEM c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
Positive measures of protection may be required especially vis-à-vis journalists and newspapers (see Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 42-46, ECHR 2000-III, where the Turkish State was found to be under a positive obligation to take investigative and protective measures where a pro-PKK newspaper and its journalists and staff had been the victims of a campaign of violence and intimidation. - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 1562/10
(Castells v. Spain, judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, § 43). - EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 39293/98
FUENTES BOBO c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 27785/95
WLOCH v. POLAND
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 23883/06
KHURSHID MUSTAFA ET TARZIBACHI c. SUEDE
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 34202/06
BERLADIR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 20153/04
UNEDIC c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 56673/00
IGLESIAS GIL ET A.U.I. c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 25329/03
FRASILA AND CIOCÎRLAN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03
SALIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23987/05
KOWALCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
- EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 12484/05
CIESIELCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 62414/00
PALUSINSKI c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 47414/99
SZOTT-MEDYNSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 15.10.2020 - C-555/19
Fussl Modestraße Mayr - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Fernsehen - Richtlinie …
27 Vgl. EGMR, 16. Juli 2013, Remuszko/Polen (CE:ECHR:2013:0716JUD000156210, § 59). - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 09.07.2015 - C-157/14
Neptune Distribution
Desgleichen übt der EGMR eine abgewogene Kontrolle aus und lässt einen Beurteilungsspielraum, dessen Umfang nach der Art des Gebrauchs der Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung und ihrem Zusammenhang variiert, wobei der belassene Spielraum im geschäftlichen Bereich eindeutig weiter ist (vgl. insbesondere EGMR, Urteile Ahmed u. a./Vereinigtes Königreich, 2. September 1998, § 61, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1998-VI, sowie Remuszko/Polen, Nr. 1562/10, § 64 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung, 16. Juli 2013). - EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 18860/19
Beschwerde beim EGMR unzulässig: Bäckerei musste keinen "Gay Cake" backen
Having regard to the Convention case-law, the Christian Institute argued that there were significant limits to the horizontal application of positive obligations (they referred, for example, to Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, ECHR 2003-VI, and Remuszko v. Poland, no. 1562/10, 16 July 2013). - EGMR, 08.06.2023 - 34734/13
MAZOWIECKI c. POLOGNE
Pour autant que le requérant se plaint de ce que la perquisition litigieuse ait emporté violation de son droit au respect de son domicile, la Cour rappelle, en ce qui concerne la possibilité invoquée par le Gouvernement d'un recours constitutionnel, qu'elle a déjà eu l'occasion de rejeter pareille exception (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Bugajny et autres c. Pologne, no 22531/05, § 45, 6 novembre 2007, Sosinowska c. Pologne, no 10247/09, § 55, 18 octobre 2011, et Remuszko c. Pologne, no 1562/10, § 45, 16 juillet 2013).