Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+8, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 8 Violation of P1-1 No violation of Art. 13+8 No violation of Art. 13+P1-1 Pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2013, 993

Wird zitiert von ... (36)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

  ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  The Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the pecuniary damage claimed by an applicant and the violation of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 127, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  The Court reiterates that, according to its case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).
• EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 23445/03

  ESMUKHAMBETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  Nevertheless, the remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see, among recent authorities, Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, § 158, 29 March 2011).

• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  In this connection, the Court has held that if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case and may be satisfied if civil, administrative or even disciplinary remedies were available to the victims (see, for example, Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I; and Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 90 and 94-95, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  The Court has held on many occasions that the State has a positive duty to take reasonable and appropriate measures to secure an applicant's rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 51, Series A no. 303-C, Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 41, Series A no. 172, and many other authorities).
• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

  POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  The Court has held on many occasions that the State has a positive duty to take reasonable and appropriate measures to secure an applicant's rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 51, Series A no. 303-C, Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 41, Series A no. 172, and many other authorities).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  In this connection, the Court has held that if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case and may be satisfied if civil, administrative or even disciplinary remedies were available to the victims (see, for example, Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I; and Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 90 and 94-95, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 37703/97

  Verantwortung des Staates für Mord durch beurlaubte Gefangene; Verpflichtung des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  In this connection, the Court has held that if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case and may be satisfied if civil, administrative or even disciplinary remedies were available to the victims (see, for example, Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I; and Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 90 and 94-95, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

  PEREZ c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  It should in no way be inferred from the foregoing that Article 2 may entail the right for an applicant to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence or an absolute obligation for all prosecutions to result in conviction, or indeed in a particular sentence (see, mutatis mutandis, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 72118/01

  KHAMIDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  The Court reiterates at the outset that whilst at times there may be a significant overlap between the concept of "home" under Article 8 of the Convention and that of "property" under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, a home may be found to exist even where the applicant has no right or interest in real property (see, mutatis mutandis, Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255/00, §§ 35-39, 18 November 2004, and Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118/01, § 128, 15 November 2007).
• EGMR, 16.11.2000 - 36811/97

  BIELECTRIC S.R.L. v. ITALY

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 53600/20

  Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz u.a. ./. Schweiz - Staatliche Maßnahmen gegen …

  17423/05 and 5 others, 28 February 2012 (determining "imminence" of risk by reference to whether applicants were present or absent when their homes were flooded on.
• VG Berlin, 31.10.2019 - 10 K 412.18

  "Klimaklage" bleibt ohne Erfolg

  Nach der ständigen Rechtsprechung des EGMR erfasst Art. 2 EMRK die positive Verpflichtung des Staates, angemessene Maßnahmen zu treffen, um das Leben der Personen unter seiner Hoheitsgewalt zu schützen (EGMR (I. Sektion), Urteil vom 28. Februar 2012 - 17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05, 35673/05 -, Kolyadenko/Russland, Rn. 151, deutsche Übersetzung in NVwZ 2013, 993).
• EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 62903/15

  Amtshaftungsklage gegen Österreich: Behörden reagierten ausreichend auf häusliche …

  17423/05 and 5 others, § 157, 28 February 2012; Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, §§ 103 and 105-107; and Talpis, cited above, § 100).

• EGMR, 30.01.2025 - 51567/14

  Giftmüll im "Land der Feuer": Italien hat zu wenig gegen die Ökomafia getan

  17423/05 and 5 others, § 151, 28 February 2012).

  [37] See, inter alia, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 90, 30/11/2004; Budayeva and Others v. Russia, no. 15339/02, § 132, 20/03/2008; Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, no. 17423/05, § 159, 28/02/2012; and Brincat and Others v. Malta, no. 60908/11, § 102, 24/07/2014.

• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 56080/13

  LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL

  17423/05 and 5 others, 28 February 2012.
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 3289/10

  BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  The Group II applicants (see paragraph 94 above and the Appendix) were, by their own admission, away from their homes at the time of the events in question and so had no knowledge of the imminent attack and were not prompted to flee their homes, having only learned about the damage done to them afterwards (see, mutatis mutandis, Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 17423/05 and 5 others, § 152, 28 February 2012).
• EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 22677/10

  KURSUN v. TURKEY

  17423/05 and 5 others, § 216, 28 February 2012).
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 3648/04

  CAVIT TINARLIOGLU c. TURQUIE

  La Cour a également examiné sous l'angle de l'article 2 les menaces prévisibles qui avaient pesé sur l'intégrité physique et la vie des individus par rapport à des catastrophes naturelles ayant frappé une zone rurale (Boudaïeva et autres, précité, et Kolyadenko et autres c. Russie, nos 17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05 et 35673/05, 28 février 2012) ou un terrain de camping (Murillo Saldias et autres c. Espagne (déc.), no 76973/01, 28 novembre 2006) ou par rapport à des « situations de danger'pour la vie de personnes malades ou vulnérables confiées aux soins de l'État, telles que des enfants et jeunes adultes placés dans un foyer (Nencheva et autres c. Bulgarie, no 48609/06, § 119, 18 juin 2013) ou des personnes âgées pensionnaires d'une maison de retraite (Dodov c. Bulgarie, no 59548/00, § 79, 17 janvier 2008).
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  CEVRIOGLU v. TURKEY

  Turning to the facts of the case before it, the Court considers in the first place that the present complaint, in as much as it concerns the proceedings before the criminal and administrative courts, does not raise a separate issue that needs to be examined under Article 13, taken in conjunction with Article 2, having regard to its findings in paragraphs 56-72 above (see, mutatis mutandis, Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05 and 35673/05, § 228, 28 February 2012).
• EGMR, 01.09.2016 - 32514/12

  MIKHNO v. UKRAINE

  17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05 and 35673/05, § 190, 28 February 2012).
• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 31612/09

  PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 5576/19

  CEYHAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 1227/06

  TETYANA GAVRYLOVA AND DENYS GAVRYLOV v. UKRAINEand 4 other applications
• EGMR, 29.08.2017 - 32604/12

  KHRAMKOVY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 33647/04

  ORUK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 13712/11

  S.L. AND J.L. v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 43961/09

  SMALTINI v. ITALY
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 15613/10

  VOVK AND BOGDANOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10

  TOTCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
• EGMR - 11833/24 (anhängig)

  ALSACE NATURE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 19499/10

  ASKIN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 10551/10

  ZINATULLINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2017 - 57596/12

  HERAKLEOUS v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 58402/09

  DEMIR v. TURKEY
• EGMR - 13527/13 (anhängig)

  SERDYUKOVA v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 03.03.2026 - 4711/20

  TISHKINA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 14627/21

  BERLEC v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 29260/11

  STANKOVI c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 58043/10

  VLADIMIROV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 46962/08

  TAKÁCS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 20701/09

  HADZHIYSKA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR - 56336/22 (anhängig)

  CHRYSANTHOU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 27.03.2025 - 30336/22

  LATERZA ET D'ERRICO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 09.01.2024 - 24621/21

  ATASAGUN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 55238/12

  TUNCEL v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 5407/06

  KASHCHUK v. UKRAINE