Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. MALTA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Brincat and Others v. Malta

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. MALTA and 4 other applications

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11, 62110/11, 62129/11, 62312/11, 62338/11
• EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 60908/11

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ-RR 2016, 121

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (44)

• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90

  LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  The latter provision has allowed complaints of this nature to be examined where the circumstances were not such as to engage Article 2, but clearly affected a person's family and private life under Article 8 (see LÏŒpez Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-C and Guerra and Others, cited above).

  The Court has also held on many occasions that the State has a positive duty to take reasonable and appropriate measures to secure an applicant's rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, López Ostra, cited above, § 51, Series A no. 303-C; Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 41, Series A no. 172; and, more recently, Di Sarno and Others v. Italy, no. 30765/08, § 96, 10 January 2012).

• EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

  KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05 and 35673/05, §§ 157-161, 28 February 2012, and as reiterated in Vilnes and Others v. Norway, nos.
• OLG Köln, 27.10.2004 - 2 Wx 29/04

  Voraussetzungen bei Entlassung eines Testamentsvollstreckers

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  30/04/1948.

 
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  It has further recognised that the rule on exhaustion is neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; in reviewing whether it has been observed, it is essential to have regard to the particular circumstances of each individual case (see Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, § 35, Series A no. 40).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  According to the Court's case-law, in the event of a breach of Articles 2 and 3, which rank as the most fundamental provisions of the Convention, compensation for the non-pecuniary damage flowing from the breach should in principle be available as part of the range of possible remedies (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 109, ECHR 2001-V; Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 130, ECHR 2001-III; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, §§ 97-98, ECHR 2002-II and Ciorap v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 7481/06, §§ 24-25, 20 July 2010).
• EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01

  BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  The Court further notes that it has previously recognised the standing of the victim's next-of-kin to submit an application where the victim had died or disappeared in circumstances which were alleged to engage the responsibility of the State giving rise to issues under Article 2 (see Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 92, ECHR 1999-IV, and Bazorkina v. Russia (dec.), no. 69481/01, 15 September 2005), it follows that the applicants in application no. 62338/11 have victim status in respect of the complaint under Article 2.
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 7510/04

  KONTROVA c. SLOVAQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  The principle applies also where the violation arises from the alleged failure by the authorities to protect persons from the acts of others (see Z and Others, cited above, § 109; and Kontrová v. Slovakia, no. 7510/04, §§ 63-65, 31 May 2007).
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

  Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  According to the Court's case-law, in the event of a breach of Articles 2 and 3, which rank as the most fundamental provisions of the Convention, compensation for the non-pecuniary damage flowing from the breach should in principle be available as part of the range of possible remedies (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 109, ECHR 2001-V; Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 130, ECHR 2001-III; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, §§ 97-98, ECHR 2002-II and Ciorap v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 7481/06, §§ 24-25, 20 July 2010).
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35887/11

  DE SANTIS ET OLANDA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  47039/11 and 358/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts), concerning applicants suffering from different types of terminal cancer; Karchen and Others v. France ((dec.), no. 5722/04, 4 March 2008) and Oyal v. Turkey (no. 4864/05, 23 March 2010), in which the applicants had been infected with the HIV virus, which endangered their life; Nitecki v. Poland ((dec.), no. 65653/01, 21 March 2002), in which the applicant suffered from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Gheorghe v. Romania ((dec.), no. 19215/04, 22 September 2005), in which the applicant suffered from haemophilia; and De Santis and Olanda v. Italy ((dec.), 35887/11, 9 July 2013) in which the applicant - who was severely disabled - suffered a cerebral haemorrhage as a consequence of an infection acquired in hospital.
• VerfGH Berlin, 20.12.2011 - VerfGH 28/11

  Verfassungsbeschwerde: Verletzung des Anspruchs auf effektiven Rechtsschutz iSv …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 60908/11

  29/11/1938.
• EGMR, 04.04.2018 - 43134/05

  G.N. ET AUTRES CONTRE L'ITALIE
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 47039/11

  HRISTOZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 8283/07

  DREIBLATS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 30765/08

  Di Sarno u.a. ./. Italien
• KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09

  Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 65653/01

  NITECKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12

  ADEN AHMED v. MALTA
• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 24520/94

  CARAHER contre le ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 05.02.2002 - 51564/99

  Belgien, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Abschiebunghaft, Freiheit …
• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
• EGMR - 22703/10 (anhängig)

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02

  BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 20.07.2010 - 7481/06

  CIORAP v. MOLDOVA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06

  McFARLANE v. IRELAND
• EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

  ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI
• KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 27798/95

  AMANN c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95

  KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25644/94

  T.W. v. MALTA
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  CARDOT c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 46575/09

  BELLIZZI v. MALTA
• EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 28341/95

  ROTARU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• FG Hamburg, 24.04.2003 - V 15/03

  Vollstreckung:
• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 5722/04

  KARCHEN ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 04.07.2006 - 16631/04

  ZARB v. MALTA
• EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 4864/05

  OYAL v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

  POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 58447/00

  ZAVOLOKA c. LETTONIE