Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,23043) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LANZ v. AUSTRIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 6-3-b and 6-3-c Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
- EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 24430/94
- EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84
Brandstetter ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94
While national law may satisfy this requirement in various ways, whatever method is chosen should ensure that the other party will be aware that observations have been filed and will have a real opportunity to comment thereon (see, mutatis mutandis, Brandstetter v. Austria judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, p. 27, § 67 and Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, § 39, 13.2.2001).It finds that the situation is essentially the same as in the case of Brandstetter v. Austria where the Court found a breach of Article 6 § 1 on account of the failure of the Court of Appeal to communicate to the accused observations filed by the Senior Public Prosecutor (Brandstetter v. Austria judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, §§ 64-69).
- EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94
The Court recalls that under the principle of equality of arms, as one of the features of the wider concept of a fair trial, each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 33; Ankerl v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1567, § 38). - EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94
According to the Court's case-law, it follows from the wording of Article 6 - and particularly from the autonomous meaning to be given to the notion of "criminal charge" - that this provision has some application to pre-trial proceedings (Imbrioscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, § 36). - EGMR, 28.11.1991 - 12629/87
S. v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94
If a lawyer were unable to confer with his client and receive confidential instructions from him without surveillance, his assistance would loose much of its usefulness, whereas the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are practical and effective (S. v. Switzerland judgment of 28 November 1991, Series A no. 220, p. 16, § 48).
- EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 8844/12
Stollenwerk ./. Deutschland: Konventionsverletzung durch Ablehnung einer …
Unter Berufung auf die Rechtssache Lanz./. Österreich (Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24430/94, Rdnrn. 40-42, 31. Januar 2002) führte er aus, dass der Staatsanwaltschaft und dem Gefangenen stets Gelegenheit gegeben werden müsse, Stellungnahmen der Gegenseite zur Kenntnis zu nehmen und sich dazu zu äußern, auch in der Rechtsmittelinstanz.Was konkret das Erfordernis angeht, dass das "Verfahren kontradiktorisch sein und stets Waffengleichheit zwischen den Verfahrensbeteiligten gewährleisten muss" verweist die Mehrheit auf die Rechtssachen Lanz./. Österreich (Individualbeschwerde Nr. 24430/94, 31. Januar 2002), und Grauzinis./. Litauen (Individualbeschwerde Nr. 37975/97, 10. Oktober 2000).
- EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19
YILMAZ AYDEMIR v. TÜRKIYE
In this connection, the proceedings must be adversarial and must always ensure "equality of arms" between the parties, the prosecutor and the detained person, including offering them the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed by the other party (see Grau?¾inis v. Lithuania, no. 37975/97, § 31, 10 October 2000; Lietzow v. Germany, no. 24479/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I; and Lanz v. Austria, no. 24430/94, § 44, 31 January 2002). - EGMR, 25.06.2002 - 24244/94
MIGON v. POLAND
Thus, the proceedings must be adversarial and must adequately ensure "equality of arms" between the parties, the prosecutor and the detained (see the following judgments: Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 24, § 60; Sanchez-Reisse v. Switzerland, 21 October 1986, Series A no. 107; Kampanis v. Greece, 13 July 1995, Series A no. 318-B; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [G.C.], application no. 31195/96, ECHR 1999-II, § 63; Trzaska v. Poland, no. 25792/94, § 78, 11 July 2000, Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, § 103; Lanz v. Austria, no. 24430/94, 31 January 2002, § 40).
Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,34207) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
- EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 24430/94
- EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (11)
- EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
On the other hand, the authorities and courts must conduct the criminal investigations and proceedings expeditiously during this period (see for instance Eur. Court HR, Letellier v. France judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, p. 18, para. 35; W. v. Switzerland judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254, p. 15, para. 30). - EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80
UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
It seems, in the Commission's view, appropriate to look at the applicant's complaints about the taking of evidence form the points of view of paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 6 (Art. 6-1+6-3) taken together, especially as the guarantees on paragraph 3 represents aspects of the concept of a fair trial contained in paragraph 1 (Eur. Court HR, Unterpertinger v. Austria judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, p. 14, para. 29). - EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79
PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention is being determined, regard must be had not only to the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case - the subjective approach - but it must also be considered whether there were sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect - the objective approach (cf. Eur. Court HR, Piersack v. Belgium judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, p. 14, para. 30; Bulut v. Austria judgment of 22 February 1996, Reports 1996-II, p. 356, para. 31).
- EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
In particular, it is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (see No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77, pp. 81, 88 and Eur. Court HR, Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 20, para. 61; Klass v. Germany judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17 para. 29). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
In particular, it is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (see No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77, pp. 81, 88 and Eur. Court HR, Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 20, para. 61; Klass v. Germany judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17 para. 29). - EGMR, 24.02.1993 - 14396/88
FEY v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
Having regard to the Convention organ's case law on this matter, the Commission cannot find that such a conduct gives rise to legitimate doubts as to the impartiality of that judge (see Eur. Court HR, Fey v. Austria judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 13-14, para. 35; Bulut v. Austria judgment, op. cit., para. 34). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
3 (d) (Art. 6-3-d) leaves it to them, again as a general rule, to assess whether it is appropriate to call witnesses, in the "autonomous" sense given to that word in the Convention system; it does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf (cf. Eur. Court HR, Bricmont v. Belgium judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89, Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32- 33, para. 33). - EGMR, 19.04.1993 - 13942/88
KRASKA c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
What is decisive is whether such fears can be regarded as objectively justified (Piersack judgment, loc. cit.; Kraska v. Switzerland judgment of 19 April 1993, Series A no. 254-B, p. 50, para. 32). - EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
3 (Art. 5-3) of the Convention (Eur. Court HR, B. v. Austria judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, p. 14, para. 36). - EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
As to the subjective test, the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (Bulut v. Austria judgment, op. cit., para. 32; Padovani v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, para. 26). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 24430/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,33342) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24430/94
- EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 24430/94
- EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94