Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ONUR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2 MRK
  No violation of Art. 8 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (16)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  They argued that neither version of paragraph 364 of the Immigration Rules offended against the requirement of legality: both had a basis in domestic law, and were accessible and foreseeable (The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 47, Series A no. 30).
• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 48321/99

  SLIVENKO v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  The Court does not find, however, that the applicant enjoyed family life with his mother and siblings as he has not demonstrated the additional element of dependence normally required to establish family life between adult parents and adult children (see Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99 ECHR 2003-X).
• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  Such factors include the nature and duration of the parents" relationship, and in particular whether they had planned to have a child; whether the father subsequently recognised the child as his; contributions made to the child's care and upbringing; and the quality and regularity of contact (see Kroon, cited above, § 30; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 45, Series A no. 290; Haas v. the Netherlands, no. 36983/97, § 42 ECHR 2004-I and Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no. 28369/95, § 36, ECHR 2000-X).

• EGMR, 17.04.2003 - 52853/99

  D (A), Türken, Ausweisung, Straftäter, Besonderer Ausweisungsschutz, Unbefristete …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  "57. Even if Article 8 of the Convention does not therefore contain an absolute right for any category of alien not to be expelled, the Court's case-law amply demonstrates that there are circumstances where the expulsion of an alien will give rise to a violation of that provision (see, for example, the judgments in Moustaquim v. Belgium, Beldjoudi v. France and Boultif v. Switzerland, [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yılmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v. Germany, 32231/02, 27 October 2005).
• EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  The Court has previously indicated that in the absence of co-habitation, other factors may serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto family ties (Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 30, Series A no. 297-C).
• EGMR, 27.10.2005 - 32231/02

  Ausweisung, Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  "57. Even if Article 8 of the Convention does not therefore contain an absolute right for any category of alien not to be expelled, the Court's case-law amply demonstrates that there are circumstances where the expulsion of an alien will give rise to a violation of that provision (see, for example, the judgments in Moustaquim v. Belgium, Beldjoudi v. France and Boultif v. Switzerland, [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yılmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v. Germany, 32231/02, 27 October 2005).
• EGMR, 01.06.2004 - 45582/99

  L. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  It is clear from the Court's case-law that children born either to a married couple or to a co-habiting couple are ipso jure part of that family from the moment of birth and that family life exists between the children and their parents (see L. v. the Netherlands, no. 45582/99, § 35, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 03.10.2000 - 28369/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  Such factors include the nature and duration of the parents" relationship, and in particular whether they had planned to have a child; whether the father subsequently recognised the child as his; contributions made to the child's care and upbringing; and the quality and regularity of contact (see Kroon, cited above, § 30; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 45, Series A no. 290; Haas v. the Netherlands, no. 36983/97, § 42 ECHR 2004-I and Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no. 28369/95, § 36, ECHR 2000-X).
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 56811/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  "57. Even if Article 8 of the Convention does not therefore contain an absolute right for any category of alien not to be expelled, the Court's case-law amply demonstrates that there are circumstances where the expulsion of an alien will give rise to a violation of that provision (see, for example, the judgments in Moustaquim v. Belgium, Beldjoudi v. France and Boultif v. Switzerland, [cited above]; see also Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002; Yılmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, 17 April 2003; and Keles v. Germany, 32231/02, 27 October 2005).
• EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 36983/97

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  Such factors include the nature and duration of the parents" relationship, and in particular whether they had planned to have a child; whether the father subsequently recognised the child as his; contributions made to the child's care and upbringing; and the quality and regularity of contact (see Kroon, cited above, § 30; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 45, Series A no. 290; Haas v. the Netherlands, no. 36983/97, § 42 ECHR 2004-I and Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no. 28369/95, § 36, ECHR 2000-X).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 41548/06

  Abschiebung von hier geborenem Tunesier: Täter war nicht genug verwurzelt

  Es mag zwar zutreffen, dass das Amtsgericht dennoch eine unbedingte Jugendstrafe verhängt hat, gleichwohl kann nicht angenommen werden, dass es sich hierbei um in der Jugendzeit begangene Delikte handelt (Onur ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 27319/07, Rdnr. 55, 17. Februar 2009, Grant ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 32570/07, Rdnr. 40, CEDH 2006­VII, Yesufa ./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Nr. 7347/08, 26. Januar 2010 und im Gegensatz hierzu die vorgenannte Rechtssache Maslov, Rdnr. 81).
• EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 40601/05

  Rechtssache M. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Es mag zwar zutreffen, dass das Amtsgericht dennoch eine unbedingte Jugendstrafe verhängt hat, gleichwohl kann nicht erachtet werden, dass es sich hierbei um in der Jugendzeit begangene Delikte handelt (Onur ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 27319/07, Rdnr. 55, 17. Februar 2009, Grant ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Nr. 10606/07, Rdnr. 40, 8. Januar 2009, Yesufa ./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Nr. 7347/08, 26. Januar 2010 und zum Beweis des Gegenteils o.a. Maslov, Rdnr. 81).
• OVG Rheinland-Pfalz, 23.05.2017 - 7 A 11445/16

  Zulässigkeit der Ausweisung eines Ausländers allein aufgrund generalpräventiver …

  Rn. 68 Hinsichtlich Art und Schwere der Straftaten, die sich unter anderem nach dem Strafmaß, den Delikten oder den Tatumständen richten (vgl. EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. Februar 2009 - 27319/07, Onur -, Rn. 55 [http://hudoc.echr.coe.int]), ist vor allem auch zu berücksichtigen, ob der Ausländer sich diese als Jugendlicher oder als Erwachsener hat zuschulden kommen lassen (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 23. Juni 2008 - 1638/03, Maslov II -, BeckRS 2009, 70641, Rn. 72).

• VG Hannover, 17.09.2019 - 5 B 3968/19

  Abschiebung aus rechtlichen Gründen unmöglich; Abschiebungsschutz; …

  Solche Anhaltspunkte können beispielsweise das Zusammenleben des Kindes mit den Eltern, Dauer und Art der Beziehung der Eltern (insbesondere, ob die Eltern geplant hatten, ein Kind zu bekommen), Anerkennung des Kindes nach der Geburt, Anwesenheit bei der Geburt, Qualität und Regelmäßigkeit der Besuche, Sorge um die Gesundheit, Beiträge für Sorge und Erziehung sein (Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, Urteil vom 1. Juni 2004 ("Lebbink gegen die Niederlande") - 45582/99 -, HUDOC (in englischer Sprache); Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, Urteil vom 17. Februar 2009 ("Onur gegen das Vereinigte Königreich") - 27319/07 -, HUDOC (in englischer Sprache); Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, Urteil vom 12. Januar 2010 ("Khan gegen das Vereinigte Königreich") - 47486/06 -, InfAuslR 2010, 369-371, juris).
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 8000/08

  [ENG]

  Thus in Onur v. the United Kingdom, no. 27319/07, §§ 43-45, 17 February 2009, the Court noted that the applicant, aged around 29 years old at the time of his deportation, had not demonstrated the additional element of dependence normally required to establish "family life" between adult parents and adult children.
• VG Minden, 06.06.2023 - 2 K 2129/20
  Rn. 212 Vgl. EGMR, Urteile vom 1. Juni 2004 - Nr. 45582/99 (Lebbink/Niederlande) -, vom 17. Februar 2009 - Nr. 27319/07 (Onur/Vereinigtes Königreich) -, Rn. 55 und vom 12. Januar 2010 - Nr. 47486/06 (Khan/Vereinigtes Königreich) -.
• EGMR, 10.12.2024 - 4470/21

  MARTINEZ ALVARADO v. THE NETHERLANDS

  As the Division has previously considered (judgment of 29 May 2017, ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:1417), it follows from, inter alia, the [Court's] judgment of 17 February 2009, in Onur v. the United Kingdom [no. 27319/07] that the establishment of family life meriting protection, as referred to in Article 8 of the [Convention], between parents and their adult (not young adult) children requires the existence of 'additional elements of dependency' - or 'more than the normal emotional ties'.
• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 58363/10

  M.E. v. DENMARK

  The applicant and his new wife therefore knew that their family life in Denmark would from the outset be precarious and they could not legitimately expect the applicant's deportation order to be revoked on the basis of a fait accompli due to their marriage or their having a child together (see, for example Udeh v. Switzerland, no. 12020/09, § 50, 16 April 2013 and Onur v. the United Kingdom, no. 27319/07, § 59, 17 February 2009.
• EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 57766/19

  LOUKILI v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Without underestimating the disruptive effect that the applicant's expulsion would have on his and his children's lives, it is unlikely to have the same impact as it would if the applicant, his ex-girlfriend and/or their sons had been living together as a family (see, mutatis mutandis, Onur v. the United Kingdom, no. 27319/07, §§ 58-59, 17 February 2009; Üner, cited above, § 62; and Akbulut, cited above, § 23).
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 74411/16

  SAID ABDUL SALAM MUBARAK v. DENMARK

  The applicant and his new wife therefore knew that their family life in Denmark would from the outset be precarious, and they could not legitimately expect the applicant's deportation order to be revoked on the basis of a fait accompli due to their having a child together (see, for example Udeh v. Switzerland, no. 12020/09, § 50, 16 April 2013 and Onur v. the United Kingdom, no. 27319/07, § 59, 17 February 2009.
• EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 1820/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 38851/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  MIAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 7673/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 62964/14

  MINTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 53586/08

  AKBULUT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM