Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,57039) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LADUNA v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 14+8, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Art. 14+8 No violation of Art. 13 No violation of P1-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LADUNA c. SLOVAQUIE
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 14+8, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation de l'art. 14+8 Non-violation de l'art. 13 Non-violation de P1-1 Préjudice moral - réparation (französisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
(Verfahrensmitteilung)
Laduna v. Slovakia
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
- EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 31827/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 38224/03
Sanoma Uitgevers BV ./. Niederlande
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
The Court reiterates that costs and expenses will not be awarded under Article 41 unless it is established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224/03, § 109, 14 September 2010, with further references). - EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 25198/02
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
However, Article 13 cannot be interpreted as requiring a remedy against the state of domestic law (see Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, § 56, 10 February 2009). - EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 31555/05
BENET CZECH, SPOL. S R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
In such cases the Court will respect the State authorities" judgment as to what is in the general interest unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundation (see Benet Czech, spol. s r.o. v. the Czech Republic, no. 31555/05, §§ 30 and 35, 21 October 2010, with further references).
- EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 35623/05
Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens (Datenschutz; GPS-Überwachung; Observation; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
The fact that the applicant was unable to watch television programmes while in detention might, in the circumstances, have had a bearing on his private life as protected under Article 8, which includes a right to maintain relationships with the outside world and also a right to personal development (see Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623/05, § 43, 2 September 2010). - EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 55480/00
SIDABRAS AND DZIAUTAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
For Article 14 to become applicable, it suffices that the facts of a case fall within the ambit of another substantive provision of the Convention or its Protocols (see Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-VIII). - EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 59330/00
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
For Article 14 to become applicable, it suffices that the facts of a case fall within the ambit of another substantive provision of the Convention or its Protocols (see Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-VIII). - EGMR, 04.01.2008 - 23800/06
SHELLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
The Court is therefore satisfied, and it has not been disputed between the parties, that by the fact of being detained on remand the applicant fell within the notion of "other status" within the meaning of Article 14 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Shelley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23800/06, 4 January 2008, and Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205/07, §§ 55-63, 13 July 2010). - KG, 17.02.2020 - 3 Ws 37/20
Strafverfahren: Wirksamkeit der Berufungsrücknahme eines unverteidigten …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
The methodological guidance issued by the General Director of the CPCG (No. GR ZVJS-116-38/20-2003) provides for certain leisure-time activities and allows the performance of certain sports and special-interest activities, in particular to juvenile and female remand prisoners. - EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 24205/06
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
Restrictions such as limitations on the number of family visits and the supervision of those visits constitute an interference with a detained person's rights under Article 8 but are not, of themselves, in breach of that provision (see, among other authorities, Boguslaw Krawczak v. Poland, no. 24205/06, §§ 107-108, 31 May 2011, and Moiseyev v. Russia, no. 62936/00, §§ 207-208, 9 October 2008).
dejure.org
Übersicht EGMR
Einloggen | Registrieren
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Externe Links öffnen jetzt in einem neuen Tab. Sie können dieses Verhalten auch auf Ihrer Einstellungsseite ändern.
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 31827/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,55851) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LADUNA CONTRE LA SLOVAQUIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LADUNA AGAINST SLOVAKIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
- EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 31827/02
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Zitiert selbst (1)
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 11.07.2014 - 13/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 31827/02
13/12/2011.
- EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 33172/16
CHALDAYEV c. RUSSIE
La Cour admet donc que les faits de l'espèce tombent « sous l'empire'de l'article 8 de la Convention, aux fins de l'applicabilité de l'article 14 (voir, dans le même sens, Laduna c. Slovaquie, no 31827/02, § 54, CEDH 2011, Varnas c. Lituanie, no 42615/06, § 111, 9 juillet 2013, Costel Gaciu c. Roumanie, no 39633/10, § 51, 23 juin 2015, et Alexandru Enache c. Roumanie, no 16986/12, §§ 54-58, 3 octobre 2017). - EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 10034/09
FLIS v. POLAND
The Court has recognised in the past that the obligation for prisoners to use half of their money to pay back their debt to the State was not disproportionate to the aim pursued (see Laduna v. Slovakia, no. 31827/02, §§ 82-86, ECHR 2011). - EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 36140/11
KORGUL v. POLAND
The Court has recognised in the past that the obligation for prisoners to use half of their money to pay back their debt to the State was not disproportionate to the aim pursued (see Laduna v. Slovakia, no. 31827/02, §§ 82-86, ECHR 2011). - EGMR - 22357/15 (anhängig)
NANARTONIS v. LITHUANIA
Have the authorities breached the applicants' right to respect for their private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, by refusing to allow them to receive a portable digital music (MP3) player (see, mutatis mutandis, Laduna v. Slovakia, no. 31827/02, § 53, ECHR 2011)?.
dejure.org
Übersicht EGMR
Einloggen | Registrieren
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Externe Links öffnen jetzt in einem neuen Tab. Sie können dieses Verhalten auch auf Ihrer Einstellungsseite ändern.
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,60888) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LADUNA v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 11, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 34, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
- EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 31827/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
According to the Court's case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131). - EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 77936/01
SAVKA v. SLOVAKIA
- KAG Freiburg, 04.04.2008 - 10/07
Unterlassungsanspruch bezüglich der Anwendung einer Dienstvereinbarung über eine …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
Reaching the same conclusion it has additionally stated that, when examining individual human rights complaints under Article 127 of the Constitution, it is bound by the presumption of the accuracy of legislation (for example proceedings nos. III. ÚS 10/07-7 and IV. ÚS 253/08-16). - EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 46468/99
MANOUSSOS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
The Government relied on the Court's case-law, whereby the Court has held that although applicants in detention are in a more difficult situation with regard to the requirement of compulsory legal representation, such applicants have the possibility of requesting that the Bar Association appoint them a lawyer if they could not secure a lawyer on their own (Slezák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 32487/6, 14 January 1998; Kröhnert v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 60224/00, 9 October 2001; and Manoussos v. the Czech Republic and Germany (dec.), no. 46468/99, 9 July 2002). - EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 69146/01
BABYLONOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
In view of the above and considering that the Constitutional Court has held on a number of occasions that an examination of an individual human rights complaint cannot entail a review of the constitutionality of legislation, it concludes that, in respect of the present complaints, the applicant was not required to lodge a complaint under Article 127 of the Slovak Constitution, as suggested by the Government (see Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258/01, §§ 85-89, ECHR 2007-XIII (extracts), and Babylonová v. Slovakia, no. 69146/01, § 44, ECHR 2006-VIII). - EGMR, 09.10.2001 - 60224/00
KRÖHNERT v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
The Government relied on the Court's case-law, whereby the Court has held that although applicants in detention are in a more difficult situation with regard to the requirement of compulsory legal representation, such applicants have the possibility of requesting that the Bar Association appoint them a lawyer if they could not secure a lawyer on their own (Slezák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 32487/6, 14 January 1998; Kröhnert v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 60224/00, 9 October 2001; and Manoussos v. the Czech Republic and Germany (dec.), no. 46468/99, 9 July 2002). - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 17.05.2002 - 5/02
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
The Constitutional Court has held in several cases that an examination of an individual human rights complaint could not entail a review of the constitutionality of legislation (for example proceedings nos. II. ÚS 40/00, II. ÚS 5/02, ÚS 238/03, III. ÚS 65/06 and IV. ÚS 124/07). - EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 52572/99
BENACKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
More specifically, he had not indicated and shown to the Bar Association that his request for legal assistance had been turned down by a specific lawyer (mutatis mutandis, Benacková v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 52572/99, 17 December 2002). - RG, 16.01.1900 - 40/00
Ist es zulässig, daß mit der Bildung der Geschworenenbank gemäß § 281 St.P.O. von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 31827/02
The Constitutional Court has held in several cases that an examination of an individual human rights complaint could not entail a review of the constitutionality of legislation (for example proceedings nos. II. ÚS 40/00, II. ÚS 5/02, ÚS 238/03, III. ÚS 65/06 and IV. ÚS 124/07). - EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 27042/95
DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 05.10.1972 - 4984/71
X. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
dejure.org
Übersicht EGMR
Einloggen | Registrieren
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Externe Links öffnen jetzt in einem neuen Tab. Sie können dieses Verhalten auch auf Ihrer Einstellungsseite ändern.