Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,33039
EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15 (https://dejure.org/2016,33039)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.10.2016 - 31928/15 (https://dejure.org/2016,33039)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Oktober 2016 - 31928/15 (https://dejure.org/2016,33039)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,33039) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KONOVALCHUK v. UKRAINE

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 34 ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (54)Zitiert selbst (14)

  • EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 12983/14

    PATRANIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    Whilst the formulation of an interim measure is one of the elements to be taken into account in the Court's analysis of whether a State has complied with its obligations under Article 34, the Court must have regard not only to the letter but also to the spirit of the interim measure indicated (see Paladi, cited above, § 91), and indeed to its very purpose (see Patranin v. Russia, no. 12983/14, § 52, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 25336/04

    GRORI v. ALBANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    It is for the respondent Government to demonstrate to the Court that the interim measure was complied with or, in an exceptional case, that there was an objective impediment which prevented compliance and that the Government took all reasonable steps to remove the impediment and to keep the Court informed of the situation (see ibid., § 92, and Grori v. Albania, no. 25336/04, § 184, 7 July 2009).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 59620/14

    YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    The Court notes with satisfaction that that was indeed the case (contrast, for example, Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59620/14, §§ 119 and 120, 2 June 2016, not yet final at the time of writing).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 33526/08

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    A delay in compliance has lead the Court to find violations of Article 34 even in cases where the interim measure was eventually complied with (see, for example, ibid., §§ 64, 70 and 190-95, and D.B. v. Turkey, no. 33526/08, § 67, 13 July 2010).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    A lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII, and Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 90, 4 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

    SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    A lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII, and Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 90, 4 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 22.12.2008 - 46468/06

    ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    That standard should be "compatible with the human dignity" of a detainee, but should also take into account "the practical demands of imprisonment" (see Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 140, 22 December 2008, and Blokhin, cited above, § 138).
  • EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 15825/06

    YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    The relevant reports of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman and Degrading Treatment and Punishment ("the CPT") concerning conditions of transportation of prisoners in Ukraine can be found in the judgments of Yakovenko v. Ukraine (no. 15825/06, §§ 59-61, 25 October 2007) and Andrey Yakovenko v. Ukraine (no. 63727/11, §§ 71-73, 13 March 2014).
  • EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 43707/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    Those conditions have been deplored in domestic and international reports (see paragraphs 42 and 43 above) and have led the Court to find violations of Article 3 in the past (see Yakovenko, cited above, §§ 105-13; Koktysh v. Ukraine, no. 43707/07, §§ 104-08, 10 December 2009; and Andrey Yakovenko, cited above, §§ 100-03).
  • EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 28005/08

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15
    At the outset, the Court observes that in the present case, contrary to many previous cases against Ukraine (see, for example, Kats and Others v. Ukraine, no. 29971/04, 18 December 2008; Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, 14 March 2013; and Sergey Antonov, cited above, §§ 79-83), the case file does not disclose any serious failings in the medical assistance the applicant received in respect of her HIV.
  • EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 40512/13

    ANTONOV v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 50278/99

    AOULMI c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 63727/11

    YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 49218/10

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 08.10.2026 - 55579/19
    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references; and Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 08.10.2026 - 1574/25
    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references, and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 26744/16

    KORBAN v. UKRAINE

    The Court has also found unacceptable the conditions of transport in cases where the applicants had remained confined in cramped prison vans or train carriages, without proper ventilation, water or catering, for long periods sometimes exceeding forty hours, and where they had had to undergo such trips on many occasions (see, for example, Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 105-33, 25 October 2007; Koktysh v. Ukraine, no. 43707/07, §§ 106-08, 10 December 2009; and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, §§ 66-70, 13 October 2016).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht