Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TÜRKOGLU v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  No violation of Art. 2 as regards the State's alleged failure to protect the right to life Violation of Art. 2 as regards the effectiveness of the investigation No violation of Art. 5 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 34506/97
• EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.11.2004 - 33384/96

  SEYHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  In the light of its established case-law in similar cases (see Tahsin Acar cited above, § 264, and Seyhan v. Turkey, no. 33384/96, § 103, 2 November 2004) and having regard to the circumstances of the case, the Court awards the applicant EUR 10, 000 under the head of non-pecuniary damage.
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  There is also a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition implicit in this context (Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80, 87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV, Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, §§ 106-07, ECHR 2000-III).

• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating a use of lethal force or a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, in general, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, and Avşar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 390-95, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  In this connection, the Court recalls that, in assessing evidence, it adopts the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 264, ECHR 2002).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating a use of lethal force or a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, in general, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, and Avşar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 390-95, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  The mere fact that the authorities were informed of the killing of the applicant's husband gave rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 101 and 103, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 27602/95

  ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  For the relevant domestic law and background information, the Court refers to the judgments of Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey (no. 27602/95, §§ 111-18, 16 July 2002) and Tepe v. Turkey (no. 27224/95, §§ 115-22, 9 May 2003).
• EKMR, 08.03.1996 - 27224/95

  R.O. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 34506/97

  For the relevant domestic law and background information, the Court refers to the judgments of Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey (no. 27602/95, §§ 111-18, 16 July 2002) and Tepe v. Turkey (no. 27224/95, §§ 115-22, 9 May 2003).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 22746/03

  ÖLMEZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Au demeurant, même dans les affaires ayant entraîné un constat de violation procédurale de l'article 2 (Fatma Kaçar c. Turquie, no 35838/97, 15 juillet 2005, TürkoÄŸlu c. Turquie, no 34506/97, 17 mars 2005, Mentese et autres c. Turquie, no 36217/97, 18 janvier 2005, et Cennet Ayhan et Mehmet Salih Ayhan c. Turquie, no 41964/98, 27 juin 2006), la Cour n'aurait jamais accueilli une demande formulée au titre d'une perte de revenus.
• EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02

  TONCHEV v. BULGARIA

  There are therefore no grounds for making an award in respect of these matters (see, mutatis mutandis, Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 167, 16 July 2002, and Türkoÿlu v. Turkey, no. 34506/97, § 138, 17 March 2005).
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 22519/06

  [FRE]

  Par ailleurs, il n'est pas allégué devant la Cour que le disparu a été victime d'agissements directs ou indirects imputables à des agents de l'État ou qu'il a été enlevé par ceux-ci (voir, mutadis mutantis, Türkoğlu c. Turquie, no 34506/97, § 117, 17 mars 2005).
• EGMR, 21.02.2006 - 52390/99

  SEKER v. TURKEY

  However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see TürkoÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 34506/97, § 120, 17 March 2005).
• EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4451/02

  KAYA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  It must be assessed on the basis of all relevant facts and with regard to the practical realities of investigation work (see the aforementioned Tahsin Acar case, §§ 220-225; TürkoÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 34506/97, § 119, 17 March 2005).