Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZUBKOVA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Zubkova v. Ukraine

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ZUBKOVA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (48)Zitiert selbst (13)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  However, if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity was not caused intentionally, the positive obligation imposed by Article 2 to set up an effective judicial system does not necessarily require the provision of a criminal-law remedy in every case (see Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

  PEREZ c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  The Court has stated on a number of occasions that, although the right to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence cannot be asserted independently, an effective judicial system, as required by Article 2, may, and under certain circumstances must, include recourse to the criminal law (see, for example, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 28096/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  Any deficiency in the investigation, undermining its ability to establish the cause of the death or those responsible for it, may lead to the finding that the Convention requirements have not been met (see Antonov v. Ukraine, no. 28096/04, § 46, 3 November 2011).

• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 10904/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  The Court will therefore confine itself to examining whether the criminal investigation into the death of the applicant's son satisfied the criteria of effectiveness required by Article 2 of the Convention (see Antonov, cited above, §§ 47-49; Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, §§ 56-62, 12 January 2012 and Prynda v. Ukraine, no. 10904/05, § 54, 31 July 2012).
• EGMR, 19.04.2012 - 47690/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  Turning to the present case, the Court notes that the Government did not contend that the applicant could effectively pursue the matter outside the framework of the criminal investigation (compare Sergiyenko v. Ukraine, no. 47690/07, §§ 40 and 42, 19 April 2012).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 38501/02

  AL FAYED c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  This obligation also applies in the context of designing a framework for protection of life from road traffic accidents (see, for example, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 30, 5 January 2010).
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 37393/02

  RAJKOWSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  This obligation also applies in the context of designing a framework for protection of life from road traffic accidents (see, for example, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 30, 5 January 2010).
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  The latter amount is to be paid directly into the bank account of the applicant's representative (see, for example, Hristovi v. Bulgaria, no. 42697/05, § 109, 11 October 2011, and Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, § 54, 18 October 2011).
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 38765/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  The repetition of such remittal orders discloses a serious deficiency in criminal investigation (see Oleynikova v. Ukraine, no. 38765/05, § 81, 15 December 2011).
• EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 4314/02

  KALENDER c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  The Court reiterates that the first sentence of Article 2 of the Convention requires the States, in particular, to put in place a legislative and administrative framework designed to provide effective deterrence against threats to the right to life in context of any activity, whether public or not, in which the right to life may be at stake (see, among other authorities, Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, §§ 89-90, ECHR 2004-XII; Kalender v. Turkey, no. 4314/02, § 51, 15 December 2009; and Krivova v. Ukraine, no. 25732/05, § 44, 9 November 2010).
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 23401/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 25732/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 249/03

  MURAVSKAYA v. UKRAINE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.10.2024 - 32972/20

  MYKHAYLYK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  36660/08, § 40,.

  § 60, 12 January 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013),.

  36660/08, § 40,.

  36660/08, § 40,.

• EGMR, 18.07.2024 - 77217/17

  MUTYEVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  36660/08, § 40,.

  36660/08, § 40,.

  36660/08, § 40,.

• EGMR, 22.01.2026 - 35052/19

  MAKARUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  lack of thoroughness and promptness which undermined the authorities' ability to establish the circumstances of the case (Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, § 60, 12 January 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013).

  Lack of thoroughness and promptness which undermined the authorities' ability to establish the circumstances of the case (Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, § 60, 12 January 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013).

• EGMR, 20.06.2024 - 19204/19

  KOZYR AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  36660/08, § 40,.

  § 60, 12 January 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013),.

• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 17860/17

  GOLOBORODKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013),.

  lack of thoroughness and promptness which undermined the authorities' ability to establish the circumstances of the case (Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, § 60, 12 January 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine,no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013);.

• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 13094/19

  BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE

  lack of thoroughness and promptness which undermined the authorities' ability to establish the circumstances of the case (Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, § 60, 12 January 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013),.

  lack of thoroughness and promptness which undermined the authorities' ability to establish the circumstances of the case (Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, § 60, 12 January 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013),.

• EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 44244/19

  KENTESH AND BORODYNYA v. UKRAINE

  Ukraine, no. 36660/08,.

  Ukraine, no. 36660/08,.

• EGMR, 15.10.2026 - 32761/17

  STADNYK v. UKRAINE

  It thus appears that the investigating authorities failed to take the necessary steps to investigate the case thoroughly (see Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 40, 17 October 2013).
• EGMR, 14.01.2016 - 8347/12

  SHEPELENKO v. UKRAINE

  The relevant provisions of domestic law can be found in the judgments of Muravskaya v. Ukraine (no. 249/03, §§ 35 and 36, 13 November 2008) and Zubkova v. Ukraine (no. 36660/08, § 27, 17 October 2013).

  The Court will therefore examine whether the criminal proceedings concerning the death of the applicants' son satisfied the criteria of effectiveness required by Article 2 of the Convention (see Antonov v. Ukraine, no. 28096/04, §§ 47-49, 3 November 2011; Prynda v. Ukraine, no. 10904/05, § 54, 31 July 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, § 38, 17 October 2013; and Prilutskiy v. Ukraine, no. 40429/08, § 42, 26 February 2015).

• EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 55896/10

  OSADCHA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Those facts suggest that there had been no genuine attempt on the part of the investigating authorities to carry out a thorough investigation of the accident (see among other authorities, Sergiyenko v. Ukraine, no. 47690/07, § 52, 19 April 2012; Zubkova v. Ukraine, no. 36660/08, §§ 40-41, 17 October 2013; Reus and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 40587/07, § 27, 16 October 2014; Shulga v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 40298/06,§§ 45-46, 12 November 2015).
• EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 51151/10

  BASYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 23081/07

  BARSUKOVY CONTRE L'UKRAINE ET 13 AUTRES AFFAIRES
• EGMR, 16.04.2026 - 6200/25

  KYRYK AND GONCHAR v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 12991/10

  MANDRYKA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 18.11.2021 - 26759/13

  CHERNEY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 2319/14

  KITANOVSKA STANOJKOVIC AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
• EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 69557/13

  USACHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 35431/21

  LEZNYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 62545/15

  FIYALO v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications
• EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 14480/20

  SHAKHMINA AND SHAKHMIN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 75485/12

  BUDAYEVA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.02.2021 - 63243/13

  GOROPATSKIY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 28.05.2025 - 24315/24

  MOROZOVA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.11.2021 - 54217/16

  MIKELADZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 02.07.2026 - 37590/18
• EGMR, 11.12.2025 - 45800/21

  KOSTENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 64932/12

  AZOVTSEVA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.02.2020 - 40394/10

  SAKVARELIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 24.02.2015 - 62578/09

  CIOBANU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 11464/12

  YUKHYMOVYCH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 19886/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 8976/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.05.2016 - 60790/12

  CHUMAK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 40429/08

  PRILUTSKIY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 40587/07

  REUS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 12.02.2026 - 44249/17

  DZYON v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 30.04.2025 - 42805/23

  GREBENYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 9262/19

  LEONTYEV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.06.2021 - 20789/14

  BLIZNYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 59635/13

  PIU ET CIRSTENOIU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 61946/12

  ZOLTAI v. HUNGARY AND IRELAND
• EGMR, 11.06.2015 - 42279/08

  MASHCHENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.11.2021 - 63126/13

  TRETYAKOVA v. UKRAINE and 6 other applications
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 24385/10

  ANDREYEVA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 49626/07

  TIKHOMIROVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.01.2016 - 24738/11

  VASYUNETS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 80909/12

  STARCEVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2020 - 17317/08

  KABANOVA v. UKRAINE