Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GASANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (17)Zitiert selbst (8)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  33097/96 and 57834/00, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03

  VANZHULA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  18/03/2013.
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  33097/96 and 57834/00, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 38281/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  The Court has already found that "in accordance with Articles 93, 96 and 109 of the [Moldovan] Code of Criminal Procedure, no investigative measures at all could be taken in respect of the offence allegedly committed... unless criminal proceedings were formally instituted" (see Gutu v. Moldova, no. 20289/02, § 61, 7 June 2007, and Matasaru and Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 38281/08, § 90, 2 November 2010, including the domestic court's decision cited in that paragraph confirming the above conclusion).
• EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 17332/03

  LEVINTA v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  Where no such examination has been carried out or where the examination has not recorded any injuries, the Court has drawn the conclusion that the person entered detention in good health (see, mutatis mutandis, Levinta v. Moldova, no. 17332/03, §§ 69 and 70, 16 December 2008).
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 20289/02

  GUTU v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  The Court has already found that "in accordance with Articles 93, 96 and 109 of the [Moldovan] Code of Criminal Procedure, no investigative measures at all could be taken in respect of the offence allegedly committed... unless criminal proceedings were formally instituted" (see Gutu v. Moldova, no. 20289/02, § 61, 7 June 2007, and Matasaru and Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 38281/08, § 90, 2 November 2010, including the domestic court's decision cited in that paragraph confirming the above conclusion).
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 33134/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  The Court considers that failing to carry out such basic fact-finding for such a long period of time is incompatible with the requirement of promptness included in the procedural obligations under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for instance, Paduret v. Moldova, no. 33134/03, § 68, 5 January 2010).
• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 6888/03

  PRUNEANU v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39441/09

  It is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how the injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni, cited above, § 87, and Pruneanu v. Moldova, no. 6888/03, § 43, 16 January 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09

  [ENG]

  The Court stresses that a proper response by the authorities in investigating serious allegations of ill-treatment at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State in compliance with the Article 3 standards is essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 50, 18 December 2012; Amine Güzel v. Turkey, no. 41844/09, § 39, 17 September 2013; and Mesut Deniz v. Turkey, no. 36716/07, § 52, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09

  [ENG]

  The Court stresses that a proper response by the authorities in investigating serious allegations of ill-treatment at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State in compliance with the Article 3 standards is essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 50, 18 December 2012; Amine Güzel v. Turkey, no. 41844/09, § 39, 17 September 2013; and Mesut Deniz v. Turkey, no. 36716/07, § 52, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 44394/15

  G.M. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  However, it does not appear that any criminal investigation was actually initiated to allow the collection of evidence (see Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 53, 18 December 2012, and Ciorap v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 5), no. 7232/07, § 62, 15 March 2016).

• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35880/14

  ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has stressed that a proper response by the authorities in investigating serious allegations of ill-treatment at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State in compliance with the Article 3 standards is essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 50, 18 December 2012; Amine Güzel v. Turkey, no. 41844/09, § 39, 17 September 2013; and Mesut Deniz v. Turkey, no. 36716/07, § 52, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 31305/09

  Russland wegen Erniedrigung eines Rekruten verurteilt

  The Court stresses that a proper response by the authorities in investigating serious allegations of ill-treatment at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State in compliance with the Article 3 standards is essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 50, 18 December 2012; Amine Güzel v. Turkey, no. 41844/09, § 39, 17 September 2013; and Mesut Deniz v. Turkey, cited above, § 52).
• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02

  CORSACOV AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 18 OTHER CASES

  39441/09.
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 21120/07

  [ENG]

  The Court stresses that a proper response by the authorities in investigating serious allegations of ill-treatment at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State in compliance with the Article 3 standards is essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 50, 18 December 2012; Amine Güzel v. Turkey, no. 41844/09, § 39, 17 September 2013; and Mesut Deniz v. Turkey, no. 36716/07, § 52, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 22.04.2014 - 22741/06

  GAVRILITA c. MOLDOVA

  Elle remarque que la Cour suprême de justice a accordé aux requérants l'équivalent de 900 EUR pour dommage moral et que ce montant est considérablement inférieur aux sommes allouées par la Cour dans des affaires semblables contre la République de Moldova (voir, pour des exemples récents, Gorea c. la République de Moldova, no 6343/11, § 48, 23 juillet 2013, et Gasanov c. la République de Moldova, no 39441/09, § 60, 18 décembre 2012).
• EGMR, 16.07.2026 - 16194/18

  MATASARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  However, it does not appear that any criminal investigation was actually initiated to allow the collection of evidence (see Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 53, 18 December 2012).
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 7232/07

  CIORAP v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In this connection the Court reiterates that it has already found that "in accordance with Articles 93, 96 and 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no investigative measures at all could be taken in respect of the offence allegedly committed... unless criminal proceedings were formally instituted" (see Guţu v. Moldova, no. 20289/02, § 61, 7 June 2007; Mătăsaru and Saviţchi v. Moldova, no. 38281/08, §§ 25 and 90, 2 November 2010; and Gasanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 39441/09, § 53, 18 December 2012).
• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 13421/06

  MORGOCI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 32617/16

  APOPII v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 18521/13

  DUCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 7816/13

  MAIER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 12042/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 4670/16

  CANUDA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 68842/13

  MARINESCU v. ROMANIA