Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MEHMET EMIN YÜKSEL v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 40154/98
• EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

  This means not only a lack of hierarchical or institutional connection but also a practical independence (see, among other authorities, Oğur v. Turkey, [GC], no. 21594/93, judgment of 20 May 1999, § 91).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 26307/95

  Entscheidung der Großen Kammer über die an sie nach Art. 43 Europäische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

  33097/96 and 57834/00, § 96-100, 3 June 2004, and Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, § 186-197, 8 April 2004).

• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

  33097/96 and 57834/00, § 96-100, 3 June 2004, and Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, § 186-197, 8 April 2004).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

  33097/96 and 57834/00, § 96-100, 3 June 2004, and Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, § 186-197, 8 April 2004).
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 50390/99

  McGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

  The applicant's complaint in this regard is therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 in connection with Article 3 of the Convention (see McGlinchey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 50390/99, § 64, 29 April 2003, and Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2442, § 112).
• EGMR, 01.10.2002 - 37645/97

  SAWICKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 40154/98

  The Court will make an award in respect of costs and expenses in so far as these were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, Sawicka v. Poland, no. 37645/97, § 54, 1 October 2002).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

  MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

  40154/98, § .
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03

  GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA

  In these circumstances, bearing in mind the authorities" obligation to account for injuries caused to persons under their control in custody, and in the absence of a convincing and plausible explanation by the Government in the instant case, the Court considers that it can draw inferences from the Government's conduct and finds it established to the standard of proof required in the Convention proceedings that the injuries sustained by the applicant were the result of the treatment of which he complained and for which the Government bore responsibility (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 88, ECHR 1999-V; Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey, no. 40154/98, § 30, 20 July 2004; Mikheyev, cited above, §§ 104-105; and Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, §§ 78-79, 15 May 2008).
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 19223/04

  VLADIMIR FEDOROV v. RUSSIA

  In these circumstances, bearing in mind the authorities" obligation to account for injuries caused to persons within their control in custody, and in the absence of a convincing and plausible explanation by the Government in the instant case, the Court considers that it can draw inferences from the Government's conduct and finds it established to the standard of proof required in the Convention proceedings that the injuries sustained by the applicant were the result of the treatment of which he complained and for which the Government bore responsibility (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 88, ECHR 1999-V; Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey, no. 40154/98, § 30, 20 July 2004; Mikheyev, cited above, §§ 104-105; and Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, §§ 78-79, 15 May 2008).