Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ESTEMIROVA v. RUSSIA
No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-general (Article 38 - ...
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- beck-aktuell.de (Kurzinformation)
EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen unzureichender Ermittlungen im Mordfall Estemirowa - EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen unzureichender Ermittlungen im Mordfall Estemirowa
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ESTEMIROVA v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (8) Zitiert selbst (38)
- EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 15086/07
Mord an Journalistin: Russland wegen Politkowskaja-Ermittlungen verurteilt
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
It takes note of the attacks against other members of human rights organisations in Russia, including Ms Politkovskaya (see Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, 17 July 2018) and Mr Orlov (see Orlov and Others, cited above).Having regard to its case-law on the matter (see M. and Others v. Croatia, no. 50175/12, § 100, 2 May 2017; Mustafayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 47095/09, § 90, 4 May 2017; and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, § 88, 17 July 2018) the Court awards the applicant 20, 000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
- EGMR, 26.01.2017 - 42332/14
KHAMIDKARIYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
They opened the investigation within several hours from the incident (see paragraph 13 above) (see, by contrast cases, where the opening of the criminal case was delayed: Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, § 193, 25 April 2013; Dobriyeva and Others, cited above, § 73; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 70, 6 October 2015; Zakharin and Others v. Russia, no. 22458/05, § 66, 12 November 2015; Khamidkariyev v. Russia, no. 42332/14, § 156, 26 October 2017; and Tsakoyevy, cited above, § 124).Given that the Government's failure to comply with the Court's request on such a crucial point undermined its ability to examine the merits of the applicant's complaint by clarifying important issues related to the effectiveness of the investigation (see paragraph 69 above), the Court concludes that there has been a violation of Article 38 of the Convention (compare Khadisov and Tsechoyev v. Russia, no. 21519/02, §§ 178-79, 5 February 2009; Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 297-302, 26 April 2011; Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, §§ 163-65, 3 October 2013; and Khamidkariyev v. Russia, no. 42332/14, §§ 105-09, 26 January 2017).
- EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 4871/16
Hanan ./. Deutschland - Ermittlungen wegen Kundus-Angriffs auf Zivilisten …
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
Finally, even if there were some conflicts between pieces of evidence, they were not the result of the investigators' professional negligence; they do not relate to the key elements of the investigation and they cannot therefore cast doubt on the thoroughness of the investigation as a whole, particular regard being had to the complexity of the case and the requirement to apply the procedural duty under Article 2 realistically (see Hanan v. Germany [GC], no. 4871/16, § 200, 16 February 2021).
- EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
It has already granted claims formulated in the same manner in many cases (see D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27154/95, § 60, ECHR 2001-III; Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 111, 10 March 2009; Vladimir Ushakov v. Russia, no. 15122/17, § 109, 18 June 2019; and Gubasheva and Ferzauli v. Russia, no. 38433/17, § 64, 5 May 2020). - EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09
Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
The Court reiterates that its judgments are essentially declaratory in nature and that, in general, it is primarily for the State concerned to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the means to be used in its domestic legal order in order to discharge its obligation under Article 46 of the Convention, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions set out in the Court's judgment (see Magnitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 32631/09 and 53799/12, § 295, 27 August 2019). - EGMR, 26.04.2011 - 25091/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
Given that the Government's failure to comply with the Court's request on such a crucial point undermined its ability to examine the merits of the applicant's complaint by clarifying important issues related to the effectiveness of the investigation (see paragraph 69 above), the Court concludes that there has been a violation of Article 38 of the Convention (compare Khadisov and Tsechoyev v. Russia, no. 21519/02, §§ 178-79, 5 February 2009; Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 297-302, 26 April 2011; Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, §§ 163-65, 3 October 2013; and Khamidkariyev v. Russia, no. 42332/14, §§ 105-09, 26 January 2017). - EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 27154/95
D.N. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
It has already granted claims formulated in the same manner in many cases (see D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27154/95, § 60, ECHR 2001-III; Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 111, 10 March 2009; Vladimir Ushakov v. Russia, no. 15122/17, § 109, 18 June 2019; and Gubasheva and Ferzauli v. Russia, no. 38433/17, § 64, 5 May 2020). - EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 47095/09
MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
Having regard to its case-law on the matter (see M. and Others v. Croatia, no. 50175/12, § 100, 2 May 2017; Mustafayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 47095/09, § 90, 4 May 2017; and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, § 88, 17 July 2018) the Court awards the applicant 20, 000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. - EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11
AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
Given that the applicant did not submit documents showing that she had paid or was under a legal obligation to pay the fees billed by her representatives or the expenses incurred by them, the Court finds no basis to conclude that the costs and expenses have actually been incurred by the applicant (see Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, § 327, 28 November 2017; Batiashvili v. Georgia, no. 8284/07, § 112, 10 October 2019; Dimitar Angelov v. Bulgaria, no. 58400/16, §§ 90-91, 21 July 2020; and Aghdgomelashvili and Japaridze v. Georgia, no. 7224/11, §§ 61-62, 8 October 2020). - EGMR, 18.06.2019 - 15122/17
USHAKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11
It has already granted claims formulated in the same manner in many cases (see D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27154/95, § 60, ECHR 2001-III; Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 111, 10 March 2009; Vladimir Ushakov v. Russia, no. 15122/17, § 109, 18 June 2019; and Gubasheva and Ferzauli v. Russia, no. 38433/17, § 64, 5 May 2020). - EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 31890/11
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 8284/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09
NIGMATULLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.05.2020 - 38433/17
GUBASHEVA AND FERZAULI v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 10393/04
NIKOLAY FEDOROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 21080/09
ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 50175/12
M. v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21519/02
KHADISOV AND TSECHOYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2020 - 58400/16
ANGELOV v. BULGARIA and 3 other applications
- EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10
[ENG]
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 4722/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 63638/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 63164/16
MÁNDLI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 3340/08
ORTSUYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 49379/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 17483/10
MARKUS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2016 - 62235/09
GAYSANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 17054/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 39358/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 63689/13
SALIKHOVA AND MAGOMEDOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 21126/09
NAZYROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 60806/08
KUSHTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (No.2)
- EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 18011/12
TSECHOYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 5632/10
ORLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15
KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA
The Court notes in this connection its finding of the lack of effective investigation in the case of the abduction and murder of a well-known human rights activist, Ms Natalia Estemirova, who investigated cases of kidnapping, torture and extrajudicial killing in Chechnya (see Estemirova v. Russia, no. 42705/11, §§ 68-72, 31 August 2021). - EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 33470/18
KREYNDLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Given that the Government's failure to comply with the Court's request undermined the latter's ability to examine the merits of the applicants' complaint by clarifying important issues related to the effectiveness of the investigation, the Court finds that the Government have not complied with their obligations under Article 38 of the Convention on account of their failure to submit copies of the requested documents (see Estemirova v. Russia, no. 42705/11, § 77, 31 August 2021). - EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 48523/19
N.A. AND S.K. v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
Rn. 65 A summary of the relevant principles concerning allegations of abduction and murder perpetrated by State agents can be found in Dalakov v. Russia (no. 35152/09, §§ 61-65, 16 February 2016), and Estemirova v. Russia (no. 42705/11, §§ 63-64, 31 August 2021).
- EGMR, 04.03.2025 - 75000/17
MILASHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
48523/19 and 4 others, §§ 67, 73 and 76, 21 November 2023; Lapunov v. Russia, no. 28834/19, §§ 105-06, 12 September 2023; Kutayev v. Russia, no. 17912/15, § 100, 24 January 2023; S.T. and Y.B. v. Russia, no. 40125/20, §§ 77 and 84, 19 October 2021; and Estemirova v. Russia, no. 42705/11, §§ 68-72, 31 August 2021) and the murders of five Novaya Gazeta journalists and attacks against eight others since 2000 (see paragraphs 35 and 36 above and see, mutatis mutandis, Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, § 168, ECHR 2005-XI, and Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2000-III), the Court concludes that the respondent State not only failed to discharge its duty not to interfere unlawfully and disproportionately with the right of the applicant company and the applicants to freedom of expression, but it also failed to take reasonable and appropriate measures to enable the exercise of freedom of expression, without fear of repression, in conditions conducive to public debate (see, for similar reasoning, Verzilov and Others v. Russia, no. 25276/15, § 101, 29 August 2023, and Khadija Ismayilova, cited above, § 165). - EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 43146/15
NEMTSOVA v. RUSSIA
This lack of any detailed explanation also casts doubt on the quality of the investigators' analysis of evidence, in so far as the motive for the assassination was concerned (see, in so far as relevant, Estemirova v. Russia, no. 42705/11, § 69, 31 August 2021). - EGMR, 28.05.2024 - 4573/22
ZAREMA MUSAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court has already commented on the climate of impunity prevailing in the region, having adjudicated in cases of murders, enforced disappearance and torture of persons perceived by the Chechen authorities as opponents (see, as recent examples, inter alia, Estemirova v. Russia, no. 42705/11, §§ 68-72, 31 August 2021; Kutayev, cited above, § 100, 24 January 2023; S.T. and Y.B. v. Russia, no. 40125/20, §§ 77 and 84, 19 October 2021; Lapunov v. Russia, no. 28834/19, §§ 105-106, 12 September 2023; and N.A. and Others v. Russia, no. 48523/19, §§ 67, 73 and 76, 21 November 2023) and the documented unwillingness of the local law enforcement authorities to cooperate in the investigation of allegations of abductions and subsequent ill-treatment (see S.T. and Y.B. v. Russia, cited above, §§ 72-73). - EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 11971/10
NOVAYA GAZETA AND IZMAYLOV v. RUSSIA
[1] For details, see Estemirova v. Russia (no. 42705/11, 31 August 2021). - EGMR, 10.01.2023 - 45900/19
GASANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
A summary of relevant principles concerning allegations of abduction and murder by State agents in the North Caucasus can be found in Estemirova v. Russia, no. 42705/11, §§ 63-64, 31 August 2021.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".