Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAYA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Pecuniary ...

Wird zitiert von ... (18)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

  Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, p. 12, § 32).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, p. 12, § 32).
• EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

  OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  It is clear from this case-law that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to lawful demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct and the safety of all citizens (see Balçık and Others, cited above, § 46; Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-....).

• EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 32124/02

  NURETTIN ALDEMIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  In the Court's view, where demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence, it is important for the public authorities to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (see Nurettin Aldemir and Others v. Turkey, nos. 32124/02, 32126/02, 32129/02, 32132/02, 32133/02, 32137/02 and 32138/02, § 46, 18 December 2007).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  The Court reiterates its earlier findings in a number of cases that the investigation carried out by the administrative councils cannot be regarded as independent since they are chaired by the governors or their deputies, and composed of local representatives of the executive, who are hierarchically dependent on the governor, an executive officer linked to the very security forces under investigation (see, inter alia, Ipek v. Turkey, no. 25764/94, § 174, 17 February 2004; Talat Tepe, cited above, § 84; OÄŸur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 91, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  Further, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

  BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  There is therefore nothing in the case file to show that these applicants were injured as alleged during the incident (see Balçık and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, §§ 24-26, 29 November 2007).
• EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 29100/03

  TIMUR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 4327/02

  In these circumstances, the Court considers that no separate issue arises under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention (see Timur v. Turkey, no. 29100/03, §§ 35-40, 26 June 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05

  MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  In those cases, the Court has held that the burden rested on the Government to demonstrate solely that such use of force was not excessive (see, for example, Zelilof v. Greece, no. 17060/03, §§ 46-47, 24 May 2007; Kurnaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 36672/97, §§ 53-55, 24 July 2007; Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, §§ 60-61, 24 July 2008; Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 20, 7 October 2008; Balçık and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, §§ 30-31, 29 November 2007; and Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, §§ 101-104, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 14.03.2019 - 42899/11

  ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 54 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  4327/02.
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 38676/08

  [ENG]

  With regard to non-pecuniary damage, it considers that the applicants are sufficiently compensated by the finding of a violation of Article 11 of the Convention (see Oya Ataman, cited above, § 48, and Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 54, 7 October 2008).

• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 17054/08

  [ENG]

  It cannot therefore be said that the police were called upon to react without prior preparation (see Rehbock, cited above, § 72, and Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 21, 7 October 2008).
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 37273/10

  ÇELEBI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE et 17 autres requêtes

  Bref, il n'existe aucun élément ou commencement de preuve susceptible d'étayer leurs allégations selon lesquelles ils ont subi des traitements contraires à l'article 3 (Oya Ataman c. Turquie, no 74552/01, § 26, CEDH 2006-XIII, Saya et autres c. Turquie, no 4327/02, § 15, 7 octobre 2008, et Aytaş et autres c. Turquie, no 6758/05, § 14, 8 décembre 2009).
• EGMR, 28.03.2013 - 10195/08

  [ENG]

  In many such cases, the Court has held that the burden of proof rested on the Government to demonstrate solely that such use of force was not excessive (see Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 107, 2 April 2009, with further references to the cases of Zelilof v. Greece, no. 17060/03, §§ 46-47, 24 May 2007; Kurnaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 36672/97, §§ 53-55, 24 July 2007; Vladimir Romanov, cited above, §§ 60-61; Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 20, 7 October 2008; Balçık and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, §§ 30-31, 29 November 2007; and Matko, cited above, §§ 101-104).
• EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 29835/05

  [ENG]

  In the Court's view, it was not unreasonable for the applicants to await the outcome of the proceedings against the police officers who forcefully removed them from the demonstration (see Eksi and Ocak v. Turkey, no. 44920/04, § 25, 23 February 2010 and the case cited therein; see also Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 36, 7 October 2008).
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 16999/04

  SAMÜT KARABULUT v. TURKEY

  The Court considers that the police intervention and the subsequent arrest of the applicant constituted, in itself, an interference with the applicant's rights under Article 11 of the Convention (see Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 39, 7 October 2008[1]).
• EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 33112/04

  KARATEPE ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Bref, il n'existe aucun élément ou commencement de preuve à l'appui de leurs allégations de traitements contraires à l'article 3 de la Convention (Oya Ataman, précité, § 26, et Saya et autres c. Turquie, no 4327/02, § 15, 7 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 20129/07

  [ENG]

  Further, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply particularly thorough scrutiny (see Güler and Öngel, cited above, § 26, and Saya and Others v. Turkey, no. 4327/02, § 19, 7 October 2008).
• EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 20792/07

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 43279/04

  ERSOY c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 31451/03

  AÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 61244/10

  FIDANCAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 29612/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 30357/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 6758/05

  AYTAS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR - 75926/17 (anhängig)

  VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA