Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KIM v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Take proceedings) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Kim v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KIM v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (39)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  In accordance with Article 3 of the Convention, the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity and that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  The Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances or the victim's behaviour (see Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 44, 20 July 2004, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  It should thus be left to the Committee of Ministers to supervise, on the basis of the information provided by the respondent State and with due regard to the applicant's evolving situation, the adoption of such measures that are feasible, timely, adequate and sufficient to ensure the maximum possible reparation for the violations found by the Court (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, § 255, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02

  DRIZA c. ALBANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  In that connection, the Court considers that general measures at the national level are undoubtedly called for in the execution of the present judgment (see Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 125, ECHR 2007-V (extracts), and Louled Massoud, cited above, § 47).
• EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99

  BALOGH v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  The Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances or the victim's behaviour (see Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 44, 20 July 2004, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

  Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

  INFORMATION DOCUMENT ABOUT EXECUTION OF THE JUDGMENT IN KIM V. RUSSIA (No. 44260/13).

  A document entitled "Communication from the Russian Federation concerning the case of Kim against Russian Federation (Application no. 44260/13) DH-DD(2015)527" contained an action plan aimed at execution of the judgment which had found a breach of Article 3 and Article 5 § 1 (f) and 5 § 4 on account of the conditions of detention, detention itself and the absence of review during the two years pending the applicant R.A. Kim's expulsion.

  In doing so, the Court has had regard to constant overcrowding which was severe enough to justify, in its own right, the finding of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention, seen against the background of virtually non-existent outdoor exercise and deficient hygiene facilities (see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, § 32, 17 July 2014).

• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15

  Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben

  The applicant argued that the domestic regulation of detention with a view to enforcing the penalty of administrative removal was defective in terms of Article 5 of the Convention, as established by the Court in Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, judgment of 17 July 2014).
• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  M.D. v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  A summary of domestic law provisions concerning the detention of foreign nationals pending expulsion is contained in the judgments in the cases of Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, §§ 41-57 and 68-74, 17 July 2014), and Azimov v. Russia (no. 67474/11, §§ 75-81 and 83, 18 April 2013).

  Execution proceedings relating to the judgment in the case of Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, 17 July 2014.

• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Those measures should be feasible, timely, adequate and sufficient to ensure the maximum possible reparation for the violations found by the Court, and they should put the applicant, as far as possible, in the position in which he had been before his arrest (see, mutatis mutandis, Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, § 74, 17 July 2014).
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 11556/17

  MAINOV v. RUSSIA

  For relevant provisions of the domestic law and practice, see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, §§ 23-25, 17 July 2014.

  Nor can it be found that the cumulative effect of the other aspects of the detention which the applicant complained about reached the threshold of severity required to characterise the treatment as inhuman or degrading within the meaning of Article 3 (compare with the Court's findings in respect of the same detention facility at the relevant period of time, Mskhiladze v. Russia, no. 47741/16, §§ 38-39, 13 February 2018, and contrast with the Court's findings in respect of a previous period, Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, §§ 17-22, 31-35, 17 July 2014, and M.S.A. and Others v. Russia, no. 29957/14 and 8 others, § 58, 12 December 2017).

• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 23019/15

  ALIMURADOV v. RUSSIA

  For relevant provisions of the domestic law and practice, see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, §§ 23-25, 17 July 2014.

  The Court has already found that the conditions of detention in the Krasnoye Selo facility at the material time amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, § 34, 17 July 2014, and M.S.A. and Others v. Russia, no. 29957/14 and 8 others, § 58, 12 December 2017).

• EGMR, 29.05.2019 - 15172/13

  EGMR moniert Verstöße Aserbaidschans gegen Urteile

  C'est donc à lui qu'il appartient de vérifier, à partir des informations fournies par l'État défendeur et en tenant dûment compte de l'évolution de la situation du requérant, qu'auront été adoptées en temps utile les mesures réalisables, adéquates et suffisantes pour réparer dans toute la mesure possible les violations constatées par la Cour (Mukhitdinov c. Russie, no 20999/14, § 114, 21 mai 2015, Mamazhonov c. Russie, no 17239/13, § 236, 23 octobre 2014, Kim c. Russie, no 44260/13, § 74, 17 juillet 2014, et Savriddin Dzhurayev c. Russie, no 71386/10, § 255, CEDH 2013 (extraits)).
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  MARDONSHOYEV v. RUSSIA

  For relevant provisions of the domestic law and practice, see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, §§ 23-25, 17 July 2014.

  The Court has found that the conditions of detention in the Krasnoye Selo facility, as they obtained at least until late 2014, amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, § 34, 17 July 2014, and M.S.A. and Others v. Russia, no. 29957/14 and 8 others, § 58, 12 December 2017).

• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 47741/16

  MSKHILADZE v. RUSSIA

  In May 2016 the Russian authorities submitted a communication to the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers (Action Plan, DH-DD(2015)527) relating to the execution of the Court's judgment in Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, §§ 41-57 and 68-74, 17 July 2014).

  The Court observes that the applicant did not allege that he had been kept at the relevant time in severely overcrowded conditions resulting, for instance, in him not having an individual sleeping place and having to take it in turns to sleep (see, by contrast, Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, §§ 18-19 and 41-57, 17 July 2014 concerning the same detention facility in 2013, and Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, § 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 27584/20

  K.J. AND C.C. v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  Rn. 92 K.J. relied on the violations found by the Court in Azimov v. Russia (cited above, §§ 152 and 171-73); Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, §§ 41-57, 17 July 2014); and A.N. and Others v. Russia ([Committee], no. 61689/16 and 3 others, § 34, 23 October 2018).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 18.12.2025 - C-580/24

  Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union - …
• EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 53114/20

  KHOKHLOV v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 11916/15
• EGMR, 06.04.2021 - 25079/19

  M.L. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 2236/16

  S.S. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.06.2017 - 77450/12

  S.M.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 01.10.2024 - 26838/22

  QUINTERO MENDEZ v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 10112/16

  AL HUSIN v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 29957/14

  SHEYKH ALI v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 66373/13

  KHALIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 68900/13

  ESHONKULOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 38042/18

  A.K. v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 59387/18

  RASULOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 45761/18

  N.K. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 724/18

  MUMANZHINOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.02.2025 - 19274/20

  DZHANDZHGAVA v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 02.12.2021 - 42787/11

  YEVDOKIMOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 30261/17

  R.K. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 45852/17

  ISMAILOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 78386/14

  SAAKYAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 30831/15 (anhängig)

  RAZGOVOROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 10796/16 (anhängig)

  H.D. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 19980/16 (anhängig)

  N.K. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 35675/16 (anhängig)

  A.A. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 10803/16 (anhängig)

  S.W. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 55080/12

  CHANTURIDZE v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  CHKHIKVISHVILI v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 10583/16 (anhängig)

  B.Z. v. RUSSIA